My quotes for @CNN, on US House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s changing his Taiwan trip into a in-person meeting with #Taiwan’s President @iingwen in California.
@CNN@iingwen Tsai’s potential meeting with Kevin McCarthy in California is not necessarily a “replacement or downgrade, but an add-on”, or a bonus.
McCarthy could always visit Taiwan at a later date. 2/
Taiwan is balancing multiple needs here.
1. A visit by yet another US House Speaker (after Nancy Pelosi) could #normalize high-level visits by American officials, and consolidate earlier gains. /3
2. Yet Taiwan also needs to be seen by its Western partners that it is being a responsible stakeholder in the process.
Some may be concerned about whether another visit at this time may be too unnecessarily provocative, as partners are already stretched thin w. helping Ukraine/4
They may think that there is better timing than this current moment to be pursing another US speaker visit to Taiwan. And Taiwan wants to be seen as an understanding friend.
Yet canceling a potential trip risks been read by Beijing as a sign of US weakness & weaken deterrence./5
Compromise solution: Don't cancel the visit, but leave it to the longer term, and reschedule/shelf it for now.
And in the short-term, hold a meeting in the US to reassure partners & Taiwanese especially -- it can be a very visual #deliverable to show continued US support... /6
for Taiwan, regardless of change of party leadership in the US Congress.
So long as Taiwan's President Tsai receives upgraded protocol treatment than before during her US visit and meeting with Speaker McCarthy, Taiwan can read it as a win -- and a much lower cost one at that./7
e.g. this time Tsai will reportedly get to make a formal 'speech' during her California visit -- an upgrade from her 2018 trip, when she only got to make more casual 'remarks'. Perhaps some other bells and whistles will get thrown in, too. /8
Taiwan is helping the US in the @FT story, as the TW official who leaked the scoop framed it as TW's idea to meet in the US (instead of McCarthy going to TW). This way, in accepting TW's offer, US is 'playing good host', rather than being soft on China. /9 ft.com/content/69b627…
Per FT's original wording: "A second Taiwanese official said that after McCarthy expressed his view that Taiwan’s concerns about Beijing’s response were “reasonable”, Tsai’s team had said, “why don’t we take the opportunity of the stopover [in the US] to meet”." /10
In initiate the meeting in California idea, TW opts to not go for a homerun right now, to: 1. ⬇️partners' concerns about potential PRC military action. 2. Save US/McCarthy face. 3. Keeping specter of another potential US House Speaker visit to Taiwan in reserve as a leverage./11
Link to the CNN full story by CNN's Beijing Bureau and the brilliant @Nectar_Gan. /12/end
China's cabinet & CCP party issue a new directive that calls for "resolute opposition and boycott of erroneous Western concepts such as 'constitutional rule' and 'separation of powers'".
2/ This likely forebodes more constitutional reform to come at next week's annual two sessions (China's parliament session).
Specifically it hints at further enshrining of Xi and Xi Jinping thought into the constitution.
3/ Namely either 'two establishes' and/or 'two safeguards' (兩個確立 and 兩個維護) may make their way into China's constitution. The latter had already being incorporated into the party charter at 20th PC last October.
#China releases its comprehensive official position paper on #Ukraine today.
It seems like: 1) a very thinly veiled attempt to help Russia achieve an upper hand over Ukraine, though 2) superficially disguised as a call for peace to deflect Western criticism. A short🧵
2/ Paper's Point 2 calls for 'prevent #bloc confrontation"' (防止形成陣營對抗).
What does that mean? It means nobody should help Ukraine. Russia is on its own and has essentially no 'bloc' or other countries overtly helping it. But Ukraine does...
3/ Ukraine gets significant ongoing assistance from Western countries.
So when China says the Ukraine-Russia war should not be a contest between 'blocs', China is effectively saying Ukraine shouldn't get support from other countries in the Western camp.
As US alleges China is providing 'non-lethal support' for Russia, China's MFA fires back and blames US for giving weapons to Ukraine.
This is in line with longstanding Chinese view. PSA: Back in Sept 2022, China effectively said that Russia's war against Ukraine is a #JustWar./1
2/ The closest thing to a direct official Chinese judgment of the nature of that war so far (AFAIK) comes from China's #3 leader, National People's Congress Speaker Li Zhanshu.
3/ When Li Zhanshu visited Russia in Sept 2022, he told Russian Duma's speaker that "China understands and supports matters concerning Russia's core interests."
("在涉及俄罗斯核心利益和一些重大关键问题上,中方对俄罗斯表示充分的理解和支持。")
2/ But Beijing wants to 'soften' without appearing 'soft'. So it chooses a particular timing for extending olive branches towards Taiwan (like partially lifting some trade sanctions).
Taiwan's opposition party KMT is currently touring across China.
3/ So Beijing is very publicly announcing quite a few good news on Taiwan just before as well as during the (Beijing-friendlier) Taiwanese opposition's visit, to let the latter take the credit for bringing a thaw to cross-Strait relations.
At China's CCP Party School annual high-level cadet training, Xi Jinping unveils a new term '#ChineseModernization', & juxtaposes it w. 'Western modernization'.
Underlying message: Chinese exp isn't a bad mutation of standard (Western) modernization, but an equally valid variant
2/ This certainly sounds like a new ideological doctrine in the making. A natural question to ask is: does this entail a new, more aggressive international messaging campaign will follow?
3/ Probably not. Because this new term actually carries a clearly more limited international ambition and an obvious inward-facing domestic orientation.
'Chinese modernization' narrative is explicitly not designed for export.