🧵: Interesting flurry of critical reporting on Nord Stream sabotage today. Of course, major motivation is damage control following Sy Hersh's article, but I suggest overriding purpose is preparing the ground for Ukraine to be comprehensively thrown under the bus by the West.
NYT careful not to blame Zelensky personally, but throughout there are nudges and winks. A "pro-Ukrainian group" was responsible. Ukraine had "most logical potential motive to attack the pipelines." It might have been conducted by a "proxy force" connected to Kiev.
Near the end, we get to the crunch. "Ukrainian involvement could upset relationship [with] Germany, souring public support...Findings that put blame on Kyiv could prompt backlash in Europe and make it harder for the West to maintain a united front in support of Ukraine."
Then, hours later, Zeit reports the boat from which the Nord Stream attacks were carried out was "rented by a company owned by Ukrainians." It's unknown who ordered the action, but "traces lead" to Kiev.
"Western secret service" said to have tipped off "European partners" a "Ukrainian commando", part of a "pro-Ukraine group" was responsible. Remarkably unambiguous how this information has been known for some time and sat on, waiting for the day its release will be most impactful.
Despite all that, German investigators still pulling punches. They claim to not yet know "who commissioned the suspected group of perpetrators," and are considering whether it was a false flag, but have no evidence it was. Awaiting greenlight to 'burn' a Ukrainian gov patsy?
ADDENDUM: I was sceptical of Hersh's revelations, not least due to Britain's absence. Very striking passage in NYT report states "no American or British nationals involved." That could be true - Chris Donnelly's criminal network has an overseas component #IntegrityInitiative
Re-reading the article, attempt to distance US from Ukrainian actions is as farcical as it is marked. It's not the first time we've been told Washington has absolutely no idea what Kiev is up to (🙄), but *condemning* those acts certainly is.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kit Klarenberg

Kit Klarenberg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KitKlarenberg

Mar 6
Likely you haven't heard of Pilgrims Group. References to company in the media are extremely rare. However, they're well known to Western news outlets - they provide protection services to journalists in hostile environments, and embed their security specialists in news crews.
Pilgrims Group was active on the ground in Ukraine from the early days of the US-orchestrated Maidan coup in 2013, and within mere hours of #MH17 generated multiple teams to ferry journalists around, thus maintaining a high degree of editorial control over their output.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 3
Shift continues apace. Latest entry from the NYT: Ukraine cannot win without direct US/NATO involvement, which isn't going to happen, Western arms stocks are empty and not getting replenished anytime soon, and weapons Kiev needs won't/can't be given.

nytimes.com/2023/03/02/opi…
What's more, the longer this goes on, the further Russia can damage Ukraine politically and economically, making EU and NATO membership even more unlikely, and a counteroffensive by Kiev is likely to risk the loss of yet further territory.
Opening para remarkable - Putin's "greatest blunder was giving West impression Russia could lose war" against "supercharged, savvy Ukrainian patriots". That was in fact "impression" given by the media. And now they admit it was never true...
Read 4 tweets
Feb 8
🧵: Shift in media narrative on Ukraine of late extraordinary. Exhibit A: February 7 NYT column from neocon POS Christopher Caldwell. He openly states Kiev "is losing the war", while Russia has "an intact economy and superior military technology." ImageImage
Caldwell warns US no longer “helping” or “advising” or “supplying”, but *replacing* Ukraine as Russia’s "main battlefield adversary." Washington "is fighting" - "participating in military operations at the moment they happen." And this situation could get much more dangerous. ImageImageImage
Caldwell cautions war is "not a clash of values" but struggle for "territory and power", and Russia has "fewer good options for backing down than US policymakers seem to think." As @TheGrayzoneNews has exposed, it's Britain that thinks Moscow will eventually yield. God help us... ImageImageImageImage
Read 7 tweets
Feb 6
This article is so, *so* bad, difficult to know where to begin. The Nation published some (award winning) articles by @AaronJMate on Russiagate, and has failed to be "critical of Putin’s management of the coronavirus" (?!?!), so it's a Russian disinfo outlet...
Author also takes umbrage at @AaronJMate "dismissing stories about Russia’s offer of rewards for killing US personnel in Afghanistan". Which the Biden administration has admitted was completely false (not that it made any sense in the first place).
Unsurprising published by Spyline Times. Its propriertor Peter Jukes is a psychopath, and pathological liar, who has enriched himself off by spinning absolute fantasies about Russian meddling. He loathes Aaron for exposing this bullshit but refuses to debate him. I wonder why?
Read 4 tweets
Feb 5
Last year, @chloehadj-iMI6eou made dire hatchet job BBC 'documentary' starring British intel asset @paulmasonnews, targeting academics @jrschlosberg and @Tim_Hayward_. She subsequently contacted Justin's employer falsely alleging he'd spread "disinformation" about COVID19. Image
That seems to have been an attempt to get @jrschlosberg fired. And, as @Tracking_Power and I documented for @TheGrayzoneNews, there are very strong grounds to believe the 'documentary' was produced at the behest of British intelligence:

thegrayzone.com/2022/08/21/bbc…
Oddly, right around the time the documentary was in production, @paulmasonnews and @Londonstani were discussing in secret how to take down @TheGrayzoneNews. They wanted @chloehadj involved. We understand she aggressively probed Tim and Justin about us during their interviews. ImageImageImage
Read 4 tweets
Jan 31
In 2007, Saakashvili ordered the assassination of Badri Patarkatsishvili. Security service operatives suggested poisoning him with a particular substance. "You smear [it] on the door handle," they said - the alleged method by which the Skirpals were struck with novichok.
BuzzFeed's execrable 2017 From Russia With Blood series attributes Patarkatsishvili's death to the Russians, based on claims of anonymous US spooks. The series was fundamental to cementing the notion of Kremlin-directed murders on British soil in the year prior to Salisbury.
In the wake of the Skripals' poisoning, the British government announced it would review the 14 "suspicious" deaths BuzzFeed attributed on the basis of zero evidence whatsoever to Russia. Five months later, it was confirmed there was no basis for reopening the cases.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(