One thing about the failed #LymeDisease#vaccine—#LYMErix—that has always been sort of a mystery is what the heck SmithKline @GSK meant by “definite #Lyme disease” and “asymptomatic infections,” the latter of which they claimed their 💉was 💯effective against. 🤔
I mean…
“If you are one of the few people at risk of having zero symptoms from #LymeDisease infection, take our #vaccine to make sure you are 100% protected from an illness you wouldn’t have known you had, if you had it!”
Quite the sales pitch.
I just happened to be skimming some of my #LymeDisease library and noticed this blurb from the October 1997 ACIP meeting.
“In year 2, there were 13 cases of asymptomatic seroconversion, all in the placebo group, for a #vaccine efficacy of 100%”
Doctors do everything possible to avoid testing people who have #LymeDisease symptoms. So WHY were they testing asymptomatic people in the #LYMErix trials?
OR was it more sinister than that?
We know they ran with the idea that #LymeDisease is this entity that causes an arthritic knee & is associated with a strong immune response, excluding from the case definition those who are actually sick because #Lyme has obliterated their immune system…
So it seems they must have tested trial victims who showed up with a “summer flu” and found 13 in the placebo group who were “positive” by some measure.
Except…
“The case definition required that subjects have one clinical manifestation and at least one positive laboratory test for confirmation.”
So there is no way SmithKline @GSK could have determined efficacy for “asymptomatic infection.” There had to be one symptom.
Now that we’ve established their claim about efficacy against not having not disease is complete BS, I don’t see any reason to examine wtf they could possibly mean by “definite infection”.
“#GSK managers in MC were so freaking crooked and unreal. I saw things in Franklin Plaza meeting rooms that would make you shudder. I could still name names of CEO's that we wrote massive checks to to get stuff on forumlary.The last one i remember was for #Lymerix!!” #LymeDisease
Another fun fact: #LYMErix was sold in 5-packs, even though it was a 3-dose series. People were being forced to buy all five doses and then sometimes the third dose, which was supposed to be taken a year after the first two, would expire before the year was up. 🤣 #LymeDisease
I always bring receipts.
The article explains near the end that SmithKline did a study to determine that the third dose could, in fact, be given after just six months instead of waiting a year. 😆
This explains some of the disconnect between SmithKline’s @GSK claims of how many people got LYMErixed v. how many doses were actually administered. The number I see most frequently is 1.4 million doses *sold.* #LymeDisease #vaccine #LYMErix
It seems somewhere around 40% either expired or were simply wasted, and that’s not including second and third doses that may have been declined after adverse events from the first or second dose.
Of course, a benefit to SmithKline of inflating the number of doses administered would have been an artificially low rate of adverse events after their fake #LymeDisease#vaccine hit the market.
Ultimately, the @US_FDA gave them an ultimatum: You withdraw it or we will.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Currently @pfizer is injecting 1000s of unsuspecting victims with their #LymeDisease product that definitely isn’t a #vaccine. Bacterial lipoproteins don’t confer immunity & #Lyme spirochetes are a moving target. This 🧵contains stories from victims of the prior vax, #LYMErix.
“Patients are suffering because doctors don’t want to deal with Lyme let alone the vaccine.”
Real patient stories submitted to @US_FDA after #LYMErix injuries. @pfizer is trialing a near duplicate #LymeDisease product right now. Expect similar horror stories.
“I am able to live at home *only with support * from family and friends, and a paid nighttime caregiver.” #LYMErix victim @pfizer is looking to cause more of this kind of suffering. #LymeDisease
One of the most damning examples of multiple government officials (from two different governments) engaging in psyops against people with #LymeDisease.
Author of email in OP is Edward McSweegan: de facto Chief of Staff for propaganda against #LymeDisease victims.
The email came from a FOIA of Paul Mead, longtime CDC officer who started out in the Epidemic Intelligence Service. Unsurprisingly, many of the well known anti-Lyme #Lyme “experts” began their career at EIS.
“VLA15…uses an established mechanism of action for a Lyme disease vaccine that targets the outer surface protein A (OspA) of Borrelia burgdorferi, the bacteria that cause Lyme disease.”
Yes, Borrelia burgdorferi cause #LymeDisease but more specifically, it’s the outer surface proteins that cause the disease. Including OspA. So, injecting OspA made in a lab is a really, really bad idea.
Also, anti-OspA antibody level is not a valid correlate of protection. Borrelia evade immunity through a mechanism called antigenic variation, in which they secrete outer surface proteins (Osps) and replace them with Osps that promote their survival under varying conditions.
1/ We detected B. burgdorferi–specific immune complexes containing antibody to unique proteins, including recombinant OspA, and the corresponding antigen.”
2/ It is well known that standard serologic tests for #LymeDisease produce a high rate of false negative results, meaning patients are told they don’t have #Lyme when they really do. As a result, alternate test methods have been developed…but rarely used beyond a research lab.
3/ In the early 1990s, Schutzer & Coyle developed a test that could help diagnose otherwise “seronegative” #LymeDisease cases. They found that antibodies that are bound in “complexes” can cause these false-negative tests.
The thing that bugs me most (no pun intended) about #LymeDisease is that people accept the claim it’s “controversial” without question. If people were getting properly diagnosed there would be no controversy—so the question should be, who is preventing proper diagnosis??
Who is preventing proper diagnosis of #LymeDisease?
1. @CDCgov, in many ways, but mainly by insisting on test methods that they, themselves have said are inaccurate. They also control the serum repository, ensuring it skews toward the highly reactive arthritis subset.
Who is preventing proper diagnosis of #LymeDisease?
2. The same people who created the diagnostic standard, who also profit from the bad tests, who also control the narrative by claiming #Lyme diagnosis is “controversial.”
#LymeDisease diagnostic tests were designed to detect cases of *late Lyme arthritis*, a condition associated with certain genetics and which usually manifests as a single arthritic knee. This is the visual CDC uses ⤵️
People who have the genetic makeup for susceptibility to *late #Lyme arthritis* tend to produce a strong antibody response to #LymeDisease infection, but it builds over time. That’s why CDC & IDSA say “don’t test in the first 3 weeks.”
According to CDC & IDSA, #LymeDisease is *defined* by this small subset of people who are able to test positive by serology (antibody tests).
It should be the other way around: Define the disease, then establish testing that accurately diagnoses >95% of cases meeting criteria.