Press release says the Bill 'seeks to ensure data adequacy while moving away from the "one-size-fits-all" approach of European Union’s GDPR', though Politico notes also that 'The U.K. is eager to move closer to its American cousins when it comes to data'
Btw you don't get to run an opaque 'is it/isn't it a consultation?' consultation & then call it 'co-design', sorry
Note the SoS's emphasis on co-design with *business*
Notable, again, how people/public/communities/participatory data governance lacking in what we know so far
And obvs unhelpful that there are hours to wait between press briefing and press release and seeing the detail (even if that's because it should go to parliament first)
But let's see what's in the published Bill later today...
A couple of relevant things from yesterday:
- @OpenRightsGroup sent a letter to the Sec of State with some concerns
Second reading of the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill will be *tomorrow*
According to parliament.uk, Second Reading, 'the first opportunity for MPs to debate the main principles of the Bill... usually takes place no sooner than two weekends after first reading.'
The only change to the contents page versus the old bill (bills.parliament.uk/bills/3322) is the addition of something on transfer of property to the Information Commission
i.e. Bill structure is pretty much identical, changes will be in the details
Another difference...
Thanks, ChatGPT
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
They’ve applied a public interest test about releasing the info now versus some undetermined time in the future (this is a real flaw with section 22 – they don’t have to say when it will be published).
They say there's a ‘public interest in cost effectiveness’ & allowing govt to deal with the necessary ‘preparation, administration & context of publication’.
We’re talking about a short Word doc published as a PDF.
In short, it’s ‘the ability to think critically about data in different contexts and examine the impact of different approaches when collecting, using and sharing data and information’, rather than the technical skills required in working with data
I’ve been looking at what various government documents say about data literacy (& those more technical data skills).
Strategy has 4 pillars:
- foundations (standards, ensuring data is findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable)
- skills
- availability (better coordination and sharing)
- responsibility (lawful, secure, fair, ethical, sustainable and accountable use)
=> 5 priority missions
I'll do the traditional thinktank thing of noting IfG recommendations that have ended up in the Nat'l Data Strategy.
These include appointing a chief data officer (though long-promised, no timeframe) & an audit of data inventories - good to know what data depts actually have 👍
We were a bit more open than most to data policy moving to DCMS in 2018.
Political energy had gone out of the agenda at Cabinet Office, DCMS had a Sec of State (Matt Hancock) who was clearly interested in it.
He was reshuffled to health 3 months later.
But there were clearly going to be challenges:
- DCMS had a wide-ranging & expanding brief
- Data was - & remains - fragmented across Whitehall
- DCMS not a traditional 'central' dept, not clear it had right skills/capabilities at the time
Organograms aren’t most obvious data thing to get pulses racing. Hardly AI, blockchain (#buzzword), Citymapper etc.
Part of Cameron’s May 2010 pledges (bit.ly/2LXhdqE) to open up data, they include names, salaries, professions, jobs of civil servants & units w/in depts
Maude called them ‘the most comprehensive organisation charts of the UK civil service ever released online’ bit.ly/2uVd28k. Not the flashiest or sexiest datasets, but mgmt info vital both for effectiveness (understanding your workforce) and accountability.