1/ SVB—WHAT WENT WRONG
* mgmt: debauched its balance sheet
* depositors >$250k: thought their deposit at a fractional-reserve bank wasn’t an unsecured loan to a leveraged borrower (it is)
* Fed as regulator: that morning, the top cop said Fed-supervised banks don’t have bank runs
2/ * Fed FOMC: created the “gap risk” now kneecapping community banks (which met their bank capital rqmts by buying long-term bonds)
* bank risk managers: didn’t realize such gap risk (unhedged risk of a spike in interest rates) would morph into big liquidity risk amid a bank run
3/ * the existence of fractional-reserve banking: means the system is inherently unstable & prone to bank runs bc it’s insolvent as a whole
* banks: didn’t raise equity capital at first sign of trouble
* bond mkt: who knows where true interest rates wld be if not manipulated?
4/ * The DC politicians & regulators who are cheering the bank failures (the anti-tech, anti-crypto crowd): you started all this & you own it
* The so-called “free mkt defenders” in Congress: created an unstable banking system & gave US bank regulators the tools to politicize it
5/ SO NOW WHAT?
* loud calls for bailouts🤢🤮
* the rest depends on whether bank run becomes systemic (FDIC insurance fund isn’t big enuf to handle a systemic run)
* community banks need to repair their balance sheets—can happen via lower interest rates &/or fresh equity capital
6/ * on interest rates—mkt action Thurs/Fri means bond mkt already smells end of Fed QT, which disproportionately sucked deposits out of community banks. Recognize, tho, that a Fed pivot wld keep inflation running hot. Trade-off btwn systemic bank run vs hot inflation—hot potato
7/ * on banks raising fresh capital—that’s not easy for most banks to do fast (bc restrictive rules on who can invest in banks block huge pools of capital from investing in banks). Bank mergers take ~9 mos (+ the same crowd in DC that started all this hates bank mergers)
8/ Again, that DC crowd wanted to bring to heel the few tech & crypto friendly banks (incl @custodiabank), but didn’t understand how fragile the underlying system was. They’ve been v public abt their plans to rein in fintech (incl crypto)—well, they did it, & look at the mess.
9/ Last, if you think bank runs are happening fast (in <2 days for SVB), just wait until the Fed’s new real-time payment system comes online later this yr. Runs will happen even faster. Banks need to hold A LOT more cash to back deposits—but regulators aren’t requiring that yet🤷‍♀️
10/ Today, here’s how long it takes to withdraw your demand deposits from your bank: hours (Fedwire), 1-3 days (ACH), up to $10k instantly (physical cash). The new #FedNow system will let you move money near-instantly 24/7/365 (limited initially to $100k).
11/ It should be obvious that banks will need to hold more cash to back their demand deposits & be less leveraged than they are today, once withdrawals can happen in near real-time. The banking system will be inherently more stable once banks hold more cash—will be a good thing.
12/ I’ll end this 🧵with 2 thoughts. First, many people yesterday asked “why can’t banks just be money warehouses & charge a fee for holding my money”? That’s what banks used to be, before the system got hijacked, leveraged & financialized over years. Mkts will return us there💪
13/ That will happen by people voting w/ their feet to use better systems that are developing outside of banks. They’re improving every day. Already today 8bn people can create & use US$ on their phones w/o permission by simply running code—nascent, but it’s just a matter of time
14/ So, second, here’s a beautiful meme that went viral (27m views in 14hrs since @elonmusk tweeted it). Bank regulators have a real problem on their hands—tech is overtaking an inherently unstable banking system—and it is largely one of their own making.

/END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Caitlin Long 🔑⚡️🟠

Caitlin Long 🔑⚡️🟠 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CaitlinLong_

Mar 11
1/ ANOTHER 🧵 ON A KEY QUESTION: astute thinkers are asking why community banks matter & how widespread this panic cld become. Dunno--but it *cld* spill over to big banks. One scenario: if FDIC depletes its insur fund, it borrows from US Treasury--which relies on primary dealers.
2/ Many people are saying big banks are safe bc they hedged the interest rate "gap risk" that is now plaguing community banks + they've had fewer deposit withdrawals. Yes, short-term. But here's the scenario:
3/ FDIC insurance fund at 12/31/22 had $128.2bn (per @FDICgov). FDIC can borrow up to $100bn from the US Treasury if it ever needs additional funds. 2 issues:
a) US debt ceiling limit could come into play, &
b) US Treasury relies on primary dealers to handle US Treasury auctions
Read 7 tweets
Mar 5
1/ I'VE BEEN THINKING abt #crypto & banking, which is in the news these days (& I'm living it too). I've spent yrs thinking abt the issues. Yes it *IS* possible for trad banks to safely bank #crytpo industry: simply back demand deposits 100% w/ cash held in a Fed master acct.💡
2/ But that's NOT what the US banks banking #crypto generally are doing. Pls see for yourselves by reviewing their financial statements--you'll see, eg, >10yr securities backing demand deposits that customers cld withdraw in minutes🤦‍♀️. That's a prob but isn't inherent to #crypto!
3/ I just finished updating a balance sheet analysis of the banks that bank #crypto & something jumped out at me--8x, which is a number I've seen before. When any bank puts 8x its shareholders' equity at risk in anything & that thing goes haywire, the outcome is predictable.🔮💡
Read 11 tweets
Feb 17
1/ IT'S TIME FOR ME TO REVEAL A FEW THINGS. I've just published a post "Shame On Washington, DC For Shooting A Messenger Who Warned Of #Crypto Debacle." Link to post is here:
caitlin-long.com/shame-on-washi…
2/ First, the revelations. Today, I’m publicly disclosing for the first time that (a) I handed over evidence to law enforcement of probable crimes committed by a big crypto fraud, starting months before that company imploded and stuck its millions of customers with losses, and...
3/ (b) I warned bank regulators of mounting bank-run risk inside banks serving the crypto industry b4 the bank runs ultimately hit.

How many correctly foresaw the crypto lender implosion, warned regulators of impending bank runs & tried to help law enforcement stop a big fraud?
Read 17 tweets
Feb 16
1/ MY SUMMARY🧵re: today's SEC #Custody Rule proposal, which is here: sec.gov/rules/proposed…

*NONE OF THIS IS LEGAL ADVICE*

tl;dr--it doesn't kill #crypto custody; it's a move against state-chartered trust companies; there's one big issue, tho, which will trigger huge pushback
2/ THE BIG ISSUE (& I haven't seen anyone point this out yet)=the rqmt for custodians to indemnify for "negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct." All the banking, #WallSt, commodities & #crypto industries will push back together on this bc it could kill custody biz broadly
3/ What's the issue? Proposal wld apply Custody Rule to all asset classes incl commodities & #crypto (ie, not just securities)--OK, fine. But SEC also wants custodians to indemnify FULL asset value for losses in which custodian played ANY role (eg, an oil tanker sinks; cows die).
Read 22 tweets
Feb 15
A KEY from proposed changes to SEC Custody Rule: account must protect customer assets in event of custodian insolvency. This prob means qualified custodians must be under statutory receivership regime to protect segregation in insolvency & state-chartered trust cos in crosshairs Image
Yep, here's more. Gensler was clear abt this in his prepared remarks & here it is in writing: Assets passing OUTSIDE OF THE BANK'S INSOLVENCY is key. Translation: SEC wants all qualified custodians to be subject to special receivership regime, ie not subject to US Bankruptcy Code Image
More: lookin' good so far for state-chartered special purpose depository institutions under statutory receivership regimes that keep assets outside of bank's estate (ie, #Wyoming SPDI banks). SEC asks for comment on whether to do away w/ dual banking system but doesn't propose it Image
Read 4 tweets
Oct 15, 2022
1/ THINKING ABOUT all things bond mkt after catching up on morning reading☕️. 15yrs of my #WallSt career was helping pension plans/life insurers fix their past mistakes (most of which made them inherently short vol). Fundamental probs w/ bond mkt structure exacerbated this prob.
2/ The underlying issue pertains to how fin mkts deal with duration. Pensions & life insurers have the longest-duration liabilities in the fin system & yet they scramble to find duration-matched assets to buy bc there’s either a structural shortage of them, or they’re in banks.
3/ In the UK, where mortgages are mostly floating-rate, UK govt issuing long-duration gilts is the primary source of long-duration assets for pension funds. High % of UK pension liabs are inflation-indexed too (far more than in US) & again the offsetting asset comes from UK govt.
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(