Doug Parr Profile picture
Mar 14 14 tweets 5 min read
I've been away for a bit so can't help notice the global clean technology race that is now playing out in real times - and how this is affecting thinking/politics in UK

So apologies it's a thread alert 🧵1/11
2/11
For those fresh to this, the US Inflation Reduction Act is offering big subsidies to companies investing in (broadly defined) clean technology in USA, with benefits extending to Canada/Mexico

Which has impacted VW decision on battery factory

ft.com/content/5f78ea…
3/11
The EU is also cobbling together a response be (amongst other things) making state aid clearance easier for certain investments, meaning UK is potentially a bit stranded

Which is leading to warnings like this

thetimes.co.uk/article/uk-mus…
4/11
UK Government is due to respond in tomorrow's #Budget2023 with £20bn investment (although this may be total induced, not actual govt spend) which according to briefing is focused on Carbon Capture and small modular #nuclear plants

businessgreen.com/news/4077378/s…
5/11
But..... Carbon Capture and Storage does not have the characteristics of things that get cheaper with roll-out. It is not a modular technology that is likely to see plummeting prices with higher deployment

It is (rightly) seen as a way of the fossil fuel industry....
5a/11
...extending its lifespan (with all the upstream emissions that involves)

It also has dreadful record on costs and performance

I remember discussing it in late 1990s. In terms of commercial deployment it is still.... being discussed
6/11
What of the other UK Govt choice? SMR #nuclear reactors?

Well none have been built yet. They are all designs and ideas

Tidal & wave power are more advanced in deployment than SMRs

And they have a lot of problems to solve

nbmediacoop.org/2022/07/31/smn…
7/11
And of course making #nuclear reactors small does not solve the problems of waste, accident/security/terrorism, proliferation

Whilst these have tended to be airbrushed out of the UK conversation, they have not been solved for nuclear reactors small or big
7a/11

And they remain a problem for climate change

Yup that's right

As I say here, the world needs clean sources of energy that are quick and cheap to deploy. Nuclear is the opposite, and focusing on it saps political energy better used elsewhere

theguardian.com/environment/20…
8/11
UK actually IS good and ahead in some stuff- offshore wind both fixed and floating, grid management, data handling for clean energy

We need a proper appraisal of what UK is good at , & boost it, not try to chase solutions of vested interests in the oil & nukes industries
9/11
Meanwhile how's the UK politics playing out?

Well. Labour seem to be on the case and at least understand the problem, and have their £28bn per year capital investment pot available should they take over, and finger floating wind and hydrogen

ft.com/content/7c6cd3…
10/11
And Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves is going to the US to find out more on a learning tour in May

Although as we have seen investment is already sliding away in decisions being taken now

theguardian.com/environment/20…
11/11

So is UK going to be crushed as collateral damage in the fight for green investment between US & EU (& China)?

Not necessarily. But #Brexit & political chaos have made UK less attractive for long-term investment, where stability of returns, often lower than in....
11a/11

...volatile commodity markets like oil

High visibility on future revenues (& policy frame) matters as need to look low risk for lowish returns

UK needs to have a smart focused strategy incl skills and wider context to compete

Big job for govt, or whatever colour

ENDS

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Doug Parr

Doug Parr Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @doug_parr

Nov 4, 2022
Sizewell C #nuclear power station is being reviewed.
Here’s why, despite its low carbon credentials, we can, and should, do without it

Thread 🧵 1/16
bbc.co.uk/news/business-…
Nuclear is problematic, issues incl waste, accident & terrorist threat, to link to weapons.

But uppermost for most people will be: can the UK have a reliable, cheap, zero carbon electricity without it?

Yes, there’s plenty of evidence we can

2/16
Most recently Univ College & Espoo Univ using TIMES model (used by govt etc)

"We show a nearly 100% variable renewable system with v little #FossilFuels, no new build #nuclear & facilitated by long-term storage is most cost-effective system design"

3/16
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Read 16 tweets
Jun 25, 2022
Prime Minister Johnson has just signalled that the UK electricity market is about to undergo the biggest shake up since privatisation over 30 years ago. This will be a major test of their ability to do the right thing whilst keeping the show on the road 🧵
On @BBCr4today just now Johnson said one of the things to tackle cost-of-living crisis was to stop the ‘crazy’ situation that all electricity is paid for at the marginal gas price i.e. it’s all paid for at the price of the most expensive that fulfils UK demand at that moment
Interview here from around 8.10
bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00…
Read 10 tweets
Feb 4, 2022
Who are these f***ing imbeciles in UK govt cabinet who think "the pace of the planned switch to renewable energy is too fast" ??

Have they not being paying attention to energy costs for the last decade?

Renewables now cheaper than anything else
THREAD

telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/…
There are a few other idiocies in there which make one realise how disconnected our 'leaders' are

UK 2050 net zero target WAS one of the most aggressive in the world. Not any more. It's the direction the world is now travelling

Get with it or get left behind
And another one

Yes we've stigmatised gas. Have they noticed there's a gas price crisis. GAS price crisis. The clue is in the name
Read 5 tweets
Nov 12, 2021
1/5 🧵 on subsidies

New draft text at #COP26 (1/CMA.3 in the jargon) mentions phasing out “inefficient fossil fuel subsidies”

This has weasel word’ inefficient’ but that’s still a step forward, right? Right?

(many thanks to @kaisakosonen for help)

unfccc.int/sites/default/… Image
2/5
Not so fast. The phrase “inefficient fossil fuel subsidies” has history.

It’s not the first time it has appeared in international agreements

Back in 2009, the G20 used it too (see text here)

oecd.org/g20/summits/pi… Image
3/5
Not many fossil fuel subsidies, inefficient or otherwise, have been phased out since then

Indeed OECD admitted they’d not made any progress on subsidies at their recent stocktake in July this year - subsidies just 2% lower than in 2009

oecd.org/fossil-fuels/p… Image
Read 5 tweets
Jul 7, 2021
OK so we're going to have to talk about UK government's increasingly irrational obsession with #nuclear power again. Sigh

It matters because nuclear is now an *obstacle* to delivering rapid emissions cuts in UK

If that sounds wrong or weird, read on
ft.com/content/d115c0…
First there are perfectly good reasons for not liking nuclear power. Link to nuclear weapons. Possible catastrophic accident.

And nuclear waste, for which no deliverable solution exists, even though the problems were flagged up *60 years ago*

greenpeace.org/static/planet4…
And having nuclear power, even in a developed nation like UK is a *choice* not a necessity for decarbonisation

Recent work by Imperial College says new nuclear is not on the cost effective pathway to rapid decarb of the electricity sector

spiral.imperial.ac.uk:8443/bitstream/1004…
Read 13 tweets
Apr 20, 2021
New targets from UK government on climate change - promising 78% cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2035

What does it mean?

A thread on first thoughts
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
First - it’s great news the commitment is there.

There'll be criticism from many (incl me) who say you need to match targets with action

But the target is now there, it will go into law. It's better to have a stretch target than not. So it’s excellent it is
First, the international implications

Timing is designed to maximise impact on the international community given the Biden summit starting Thurs

UK is now a small player, and it's hard to measure impact, but 78% cut is eye-catching, creates momentum

nytimes.com/2021/04/13/cli…
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(