In 2018, Agnihotri allegedly made certain remarks through tweets against Justice Muralidhar after the judge quashed the order of house arrest and transit remand of Gautam Navlakha in Bhima Koregaon case.
In September 2022, the court had directed to proceed ex parte against Swarajya news portal, Anand Ranganathan and others (alleged contemners) who did not appear in the matter.
Court has taken up another connected matter filed by Delhi HC Bar Association against S Gurumurthy and others. Court asks the counsel for the Bar Association to get instructions in the matter since it has been pending for the last 5 years.
Counsel for Agnihotri: He has already tendered unconditional apology. He is down with fever. He was to come.
Court: What does the previous order say? When is he going to be here tell us, we'll have us then.
Govt of India and #Delhi Govt cannot hide behind the veil of corporate personality especially when it comes to the discharge of binding obligations owed by the DMRC: Delhi High Court on payment of dues of an arbitral award to Reliance Infrastructure-owned DAMEPL. #DelhiMetro
In any case public policy demands that the veil be lifted and they be commanded to take appropriate steps to enable the DMRC to meet the obligations flowing from the award: Delhi High Court #DelhiMetro
The two shareholders are not mere individuals having a business interest in a corporate venture but sovereign governments in their own right. Governments cannot shirk from their liability to abide by binding judgments, decrees and awards: Delhi High Court
CJI DY Chandrachud: Where a state has more than one petitions, it would be open for the state to file one common petition. Time for filing of counter affidavit shall stand extended to three weeks.
Counsel: Your lordships may fix a date for completion of proceedings. Other states such as Maharashtra are trying to hop on the bandwagon- they're having daily processions for love jihad and what not. They're putting pressure.
#SupremeCourt hears Advocate Ghanshyam Upadhyay's challenge to bail granted to Videocon Group Venugopal Dhoot. The Bombay HC had earlier rejected his intervention application and imposed cost on him.
CJI DY Chandrachud: How can you intervene in a bail application?
Counsel: Locus standi is foreign to criminal jurisprudence.
CJI DY Chandrachud: No but you're an advocate. How can you intervene? State can. If we entertain you, whole world will come to intervene in bail cases.
SG Tushar Mehta: We have moved an IA. There's 23,000 crores in the Sebi - Sahara account. IA seeks a prayer , from that account to have Rs 5000 crores moved to Central Registrar Co-operatives Society. We can utilise amounts which are lying idle.
Bench: In Sahara, there's a serious dispute...
SG: The society will check the genuineness of the depositor.
Bench: Where's the IA?
SG: Physical copy is not there. We had a meeting with all the departments and took this decision.
DMRC - Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited Dispute - Delhi High Court Directs Centre, Delhi Govt to forthwith attend to DMRC's request for extension of sovereign guarantee/ subordinate debt to enable it make payment of dues to Reliance Infra-owned DAMEPL.
Justice Yashwant Varma: The decision be taken within two weeks. If permission be accorded to the DMRC, it shall proceed to deposit the entire amount payable under the 2017 award along with the interest within a period of one month.
Justice Varma: If the Union or Delhi government decline the request, the union ministry shall forthwith revert and repatriate all monies received by it from DMRC post 10-03-2022. Upon receipt of the money, #DMRC shall transfer DAMEPL's dues to it.