Q's (?)
If you agree, jus concur,
or give an legit argument (but you can't bc you already kno you lost).
Its jus the bassskicks.
What is your ultimate circumstances as an individual mind who exists (?)
What is our common meduim as individual minds (?)
Q...
Is it important to exponentially & creatively increase evry1's Capabilities, & wud that category also include animals, aliens, & psychic navy seals wearing invisibility suits (?)
Decision Making Processes.
Objects [being what they do] make up most of our Navigation, natural & man made awarnesses in regards to Consequences[Y] & Capabilities, in the courses of actions we take.
We follow maps/models by using our independent minds & shared ideas to choose our actions & create, in order to have Capabilities.
Maps/models are not literal depictions of what "Y" is, but rather guides to actions Consequences ...
*Capabilities*.
"Y" has no literal depiction.
Maps & models update with awarnesses of what Consequences does in regards to Capabilities, such being Technology.
Rather than conflicting *non-updating* rigid models of ideologies, we need a philosophy for a technologically advanced society...
Using the model of Technology & Capabilities, this is the most scientifically accurate philosophy:
Prosperism(in motion):
The perpetual & exponential growth of every1's capabilities, thereby/namely yer own.
I don’t know about y’all but I’m gettin some throat this weekend.
I'm always guna be hailerisus.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Once upon a time, in the town of Punderland, Ed Rose and Dottie Darling were well-known for their whimsical wit and passion for puns.
They spent their days searching for the enigmatic"Y"–a model that could reveal the secrets behind the particular reasons that particular Thoughts & Actions have the particular consequences that they have. Their quest had taken them on a rollercoaster of laugh-out-loud adventures.
One day, while basking in the shade of a mustard tree, they found themselves in a pickle. The two punsters couldn't ketchup on their search for Y. They decided to relish the moment and enjoy a hot dog without a bun - a real "wiener-takes-all" kind of meal.
The answer to a scientific "why question" is ALWAYS a model:
[a description of what you IMAGINE Y to be made up of, & the relationships you IMAGINE those components have with eachother, & with the rest of Y the Consequences]
These models make it easier to correctly anticipate what actions are necessary to accomplish a particular vaguely envisioned real-life-scenarios, & make correct assessments to anticipate what will happen next.
These models should NOT be assumed to be [a literal accurate depiction of what Y really is] but should be USED simply because they're USEFUL.
I'm one of those rlly super #secret agents they leave alone.
Trust is built when you help others to develop their abilities & have Capabilities, or when they help you to develop yours, as in the common case of being a parent.
However, blindly placing your trust in others who want to enhance your capabilities involves taking a risk..
( e.g. driving on the road, doctors & surgery, taking your kids to #school... chefs... etc )
The truth is that evry1 is fallible, including yerself, & YOU must TRUST you are choosing the right actions.
(CHOICE in actions follows how Capabilities are obtained)
You must rely on your own capabilities & make your own choices.
Why do Christians believe some dude is guna come down after hanging on cross to a bunch more assholes, who in the likely hood of that happening, would probably freak out & start shooting at Jesus decending.
I guess my question is...
...how would you even make that out with out some sort of quantum theorm (?)
Actions & Consequences are kinda like a cross, so we are all thoughts & actions married to Consequences (?)
That is metaphoric terms...
the fact being we all share Consequences as a meduim
Imagine yourself, a rich man... banding with a bunch of criminals, who are actually decreasing your Capabilities, jus bc you hate the term " DISPROPORTIONATELY WEALTHY PARASITES "...
I think it's fair to say that CAPITALISM is an economy in which people SHOULD get paid in proportion to the Capabilities their actual work has provided to humanity. This method wisely rewards those who contribute more and this benefits everyone.
What capitalism should not be is PARASITISM. An economy in which parasites collect a disproportionate unearned share of the wealth being generated by many individuals (civilization) & technology.