The reports of a Ukrainian attack on a train allegedly carrying Russian missiles in #Crimea is interesting. While the nature of the target is to be confirmed, there are a couple of potential implications. 1/10 amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/03/21…
2/ First, despite the overwhelming focus on the Battle of #Bakhmut at the moment by many, #Ukraine is continuing as well with its ‘deep fight’ against Russian operational and strategic targets.
3/ This is important because it forces the Russians to rethink their force posture and defensive deployments in Crimea and beyond.
4/ And it allows the Ukrainians to collect intelligence on Russian responses in Crimea as the Ukrainian Armed Forces plan future military operations there.
5/ A second implication is that it places further pressure on Russia’s limited stocks of missiles. Several sources confirm Russia is now only able to fire what it produces monthly - its war stocks have been used extensively in the past year.
6/ Third, it is an indication of how Ukraine will be able to conduct such strikes across Crimea, with greater frequently, once it takes back more of its southern territory. Ultimately, if Ukraine can make Crimea untenable for Russian military forces, it helps Ukrainian strategy.
7/ Finally, it reinforces that Ukraine will target Russian forces wherever they are in Ukrainian territory and keeps the ‘Crimea issue’ live. Despite the misgivings of some about taking back #Crimea, strikes like this make it clear Ukraine intends to take it back.
8/ A final interesting issue is the timing. Coming as Xi visits Putin for their Moscow authoritarian lovefest, it could permit Putin to reinforce the case for Chinese assistance. But, it is more likely to cause Putin embarrassment in front of his ‘friend’ more than anything else.
9/ Strikes like this are not war winning silver bullets. But, their impact is cumulative on the degradation of Russian morale and war fighting capability. End.
In military operations, we often speak about ‘momentum’ and ‘seizing the initiative’. It is a term used in military publications, and heavily emphasised in #leadership & operations. Today, an examination of whether Russia is generating momentum in #Ukraine. 1/25 🧵
2/ The essence of seizing the initiative is gaining a position of advantage relative to an enemy & denying the enemy their objectives. Military leaders seek to disrupt enemy decision making, make their plans irrelevant &, force the enemy respond to friendly initiative.
3/ At the beginning of Russian invasion, the Russians seized the initiative. Despite the extraordinary courage of Ukraine’s defenders, Russian Army forces were able to seize over 20% of Ukraine and keep Ukraine on the defensive for the first six months of the war.
The Battle of #Bakhmut has now raged since August 2022. The massive human and material resources expended by Russians on this objective may soon necessitate a Ukrainian withdrawal. 1/25 🧵
2/ Back in October last year, I examined how withdrawals are conducted and some of their considerations for the Russians in Kherson. I will apply a similar approach for the Ukrainian Armed Forces in #Bakhmut. washingtonpost.com/world/2023/03/…
3/ Withdrawals, which are considered a ‘retrograde operation’ in US Army doctrine, are designed to allow a force to disengage from the enemy and redeploy on a new mission or to a new location, while minimising casualties.
This is an another excellent thread from @Tatarigami_UA that explores Russian tactical adaptation in eastern #Ukraine. In particular, the shift to infiltration tactics is interesting. A thread on tactical innovation and why it needs to be nested within operational plans. 1/22 🧵
2/ These types of infiltration tactics are something that also emerged as a solution to a stalemate on the Western front in WW1. While generally the Germans are given credit for this (known as Stormtrooper tactics), this approach originated elsewhere.
3/ French officer, Captain Andre Laffargue, was wounded in 1915 and during his convalescence wrote a pamphlet called "The Attack in Trench Warfare". You can read it here: gutenberg.org/files/60197/60…
One year ago today, the forces of darkness crashed across the Ukrainian frontier to begin what they hoped was a ten-day offensive to destroy the Ukrainian nation and subjugate its people. But the people of Ukraine roared back. A thread on a year of war. 1/25 🧵🇺🇦
2/ If one examines the many observations from this war, there is a big focus on new forms of war that emerge from the Russo-Ukraine War. The reality is that this cruel & vicious Russian invasion has seen more continuity than change in warfare.
3/ This war, like all before it, is an aggregation of ideas, organisations, and technologies from previous conflicts. The continuities of this war are easily identified.
There are many continuities in war. Every new war is an aggregation of the ideas, institutions, technologies, and techniques that have preceded it. A thread on historical continuities after a year of war in #Ukraine. 1/25 🧵mickryan.substack.com/p/a-year-of-wa…
2/ If we peer close enough, we can see the different historical layers that inform, shape, and strangle military effectiveness.
3/ In the Russo-Ukraine War, there are continuities from previous wars that carry through into the strategy, diplomacy, & military operations. There are five important continuities: war as a human endeavor; surprise; alliances; the need for good strategy; and leadership.
As the one-year anniversary of Russia’s 2022 invasion of #Ukraine approaches, the Russian Army has commenced the preliminary phase of its 2023 offensives. A thread on what is occurring, and why the Russians have chosen now to commence them. 1/22 🧵 abc.net.au/news/2023-02-1…
2/ Over the past week, Russia has conducted attacks at Svatove, Soledar, Bakhmut, Dvorichne, Vuhledar and other locations. These are unlikely to be the main campaign that Russian military bloggers hoped for, & that Ukrainian intelligence officials have warned about.
3/ Assuming there is a larger Russian campaign plan at work, these recent attacks are likely to have been probes and ‘reconnaissance in force’ missions to ascertain or test the Ukrainian strengths, dispositions, and reactions.