You would have thought that @LeeAndersonMP_
working for a 'news organisation' would have the nouse to check something he tweets, or at least use one of the staff that represent the large part of his expenses claims to check for him... but no...
Here's a little 🧵
What Lee sees:
“Her department’s “targeted approach” has removed a ban on sending luxury goods including “toys, diamonds and colour TV’s” to Nepal.”
What actually happened:
What Lee sees:
…. “bacon, ham and pork sausages” can now go to South Korea.
What actually happened:
(Note the EU have a massive head start on us)
What Lee sees:
“Pet food can now be exported to Chile”
What actually happened:
(We have been able to export dog food to Chile since 2018 - Badenuff got the job in Feb 2023)
What Lee sees:
“UK firms can now invest in renewable energy projects in the Philippines”
What actually happened:
What Lee sees:
“the lifting of the ban on UK beef and lamb in Japan”
What actually happened:
Exports of beef & lamb from the UK to Japan were banned in 1996 after the BSE outbreak.
British & Japanese negotiators agreed to lift the ban in 2019.
(Badenuff got the job in Feb 2023)
What Lee sees:
“approval of pork exports to Taiwan”
What actually happened:
A deal was agreed in 2018.
(Badenuff got the job in Feb 2023)
What Lee sees:
“new certification system with China to permit the export of ‘cruelty free cosmetics’ for the first time.”
What actually happened:
China’s laws stipulated that all cosmetics had to be tested on animals before gain approval to be sold in China.
Following a lot ...
... of pressure from animal welfare organisations as well as some of the largest global cosmetics corporations, China lifted the animal testing stipulation…… in Jan 2021.
(Badenuff got the job in Feb 2023)
So Lee, now that you are a little flush, maybe employ another member of staff, out of your own money, to do the literacy and looking stuff up bits for you. Leaving your parliamentary assistant to do the MP bits.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Scott in Parliament yesterday (22/7/21): “It is a pleasure to lead this Adjournment debate on the review of the Gambling Act 2005. I refer Members to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests.”
Scott accepted >£7,500 in ‘hospitality’ in the last 5 weeks.
This is what the 'interest' is, it was all from gaming companies, it is in their 'interest':
Right Dido Harding, I am going to let rip now and I hope you read every word.
At the moment I don’t know if I want you sacked or not. Maybe you should stay in position so that you can be taken to court on a charge of manslaughter through negligence 1/many
or treason for wilfully destroying the nations economy.
I may just let my anger boil over and say some hurtful things. I don’t care, you deserve all of it and more. 2/many
Lets not go into the train wreck of your career at Talk Talk where you were at the helm during their epic data breach. Not a problem for you as you mix in that strange world of the super privileged and the never ending revolving door of opportunity. 3/
So, @MattHancock you want more private companies involved in the NHS do you? That "partnering up with corporate giants is "the best way through"" mirror.co.uk/news/politics/…
Would you like to elaborate on these apparent successes?
Shall I start with some reasons not to?
Lets begin with you mate from the Jockey Club and wife of your MP mate.
Dido Harding: PPE from Oxford, did a bit of retail, went to talktalk and managed to oversee the theft of >150,000 customer details and the co getting a £400,000 fine.
So, she gets put in charge of NHS procurement (her experience at B&Q must have been the clincher, eh!) but she REFUSED to sit as a crossbencher.
Skip forward 3 years and knowing her from the Jockey club you decided to put her in charge of "Track, Test, Trace".