Live Law Profile picture
Mar 27 8 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
[#RSS Route March in Tamil Nadu]

#SupremeCourt to hear Tamil Nadu govt's plea against division bench of high court directing state police to allow Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) route marches without conditions imposed by a single bench.

#SupremeCourtofIndia
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi (for TN govt): Not everything can be banned, and not everything can be allowed...there cannot be a blanket mandamus on all route marches.

#SupremeCourtofIndia
Rohatgi takes court through chronology of events.

"There is no absolute right to hold a procession. It is subject to various restrictions in Part III of the Constitution. How can there be direction that marches can be held wherever desired? Some balance!"

#SupremeCourtofIndia
Rohatgi: Can this court say that RSS can hold processions wherever? Somewhere has to be indoors...

Sr Adv Mahesh Jethmalani (for RSS): Processions meant to make a public statement...not for the organisation itself. Right to peaceably assemble at stake here.

#SupremeCourtofIndia
Jethmalani: Popular Front of India was the one creating law and order issues...with impunity...Either they can't control or don't want to control it...After PFI was banned by centre, these stopped. No complaints against RSS...

#SupremeCourtofIndia
Sr Adv Maneka Guruswamy (for RSS): At the heart of this issue is question of what is reasonable restriction & public order...We as a country pay some importance to Article 19 because this is a country that was imagined & conceived by those who marched.

#SupremeCourtofIndia
Guruswamy (for RSS): In this free country, 70 years on, can public order & reasonable restrictions be reduced to this sort of status report? (takes court through report)

...They say RSS processions can be permitted only in an enclosed ground...

#SupremeCourtofIndia
Guruswamy (for RSS): Not the way in which right to peaceably assemble, to march, to occupy public space, can be curtailed...Constitution demands more, an application of mind that speaks to well-founded fear...not what they have cited.

Bench: Will consider.

#SupremeCourtofIndia

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Live Law

Live Law Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LiveLawIndia

Mar 28
Supreme Court to hear a petition filed by gangster and Samajwadi Party leader Atiq Ahmed raising apprehensions of danger to life on being shifted to Uttar Pradesh jail in connection with the Umesh Pal murder case. Image
Adv: The threat to my life, direct and open threat. Your Lordships have to protect me.

SC: This is not a matter for this court. Go to the High Court.

Adv: In the meanwhile, some protection be given...Let there be an interrogation, investigation. Anything.
SC: You are in custody at the moment?

Adv: Yes

SC: The State machinery will take care of you.

Adv: If your Lordships are not protecting me....I'm in judicial custody right now. I'm not avoiding interrogation.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 28
The Kerala High Court is set to continue its hearing on the bail application moved by the CM's former Principal Secretary, M. Sivasankar, who had been arrested by ED in connection with money laundering related to the LIFE Mission case.
#KeralaHC #MoneyLaundering #LIFEMissionCase Image
The matter is before the Single Judge Bench of Justice A. Badharudeen.
#KeralaHC #MoneyLaundering #LIFEMissionCase
During the previous hearing, Senior Advocate Jaideep Gupta had appeared on behalf of Sivasankar, and had taken the Court through the facts of the case. He made his pleadings on behalf of the petitioner.
#KeralaHC #MoneyLaundering #LIFEMissionCase
Read 36 tweets
Mar 28
#SupremeCourt to hear plea filed by former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt seeking to adduce additional evidence in the criminal appeal filed by him in the Gujarat High Court challenging his conviction in a 1990 custodial death case Image
Matter taken.

Senior Advocate Devadatt Kamat for Bhatt tells the bench that the State has not filed it counter affidavit despite seeking adjournment on several occassions.

#SupremeCourt #SanjivBhatt
Kamat : See the conduct of other side. 5 times they sought for time to file affidavit and today they seek further time. See the mischief.

#SupremeCourt #SanjivBhatt
Read 4 tweets
Mar 28
#SupremeCourt to hear today the petition filed by #AtiqAhmed raising apprehensions of danger to life on being shifted to Uttar Pradesh jail in connection with the #UmeshPalCase.

#SupremeCourtOfIndia Image
Counsel: The petitioner is seeking this court's protection...threat to life...

Trivedi J: He has already been brought here...

Counsel: But threat to life is continuing...An open threat has been issued on the floor of the house.

#SupremeCourtOfIndia
Counsel: If this court denies the petitioner protection, it would mean a death warrant for him.

Rastogi J: This is not a matter for this court. Go back to high court.

Counsel: I will. Till such time, this court could protect...

Rastogi J shakes head.

#SupremeCourtOfIndia
Read 4 tweets
Mar 28
Delhi High Court to pronounce today judgment in Delhi police’s plea against discharge of Sharjeel Imam, Safoora Zargar, Asif Iqbal Tanha and eight others in the 2019 Jamia violence case.

#DelhiHighCourt #JamiaViolence Image
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma will pronounce the verdict at 10:30 AM. Order was reserved on March 23 last week after a detailed hearing of more than two hours.

#DelhiHighCourt #Jamiaviolence #SharjeelImam #SafooraZargar #AsifIqbalTanha
Read the details of the hearing here:
livelaw.in/news-updates/d…
Read 12 tweets
Mar 28
Any Attempt To Restrain Lawyers From Appearing Before Court Will Lead To Prosecution For Wrongful Restraint: Madhya Pradesh High Court Initiates Contempt Case Against State Bar Council #Strike livelaw.in/news-updates/m…
Any attempt by any person in restraining a counsel to appear before the Court shall also render them liable to be tried for an offence under Section 341 of IPC: Justice Atul Sreedharan
The strike called by the Chairman and the elected members of the State Bar Council is in brazen defiance of the order passed by the Division Bench hich inter alia required lawyers to resume their work: High Court #MadhyaPradesh
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(