Delhi High Court issues summons to Sanjay Raut, Uddhav Thackeray and Aditya Thackeray in a defamation suit filed by Eknath Shinde faction leader Rahul Ramesh Shewale.
Shewale filed the defamation suit against Raut and others for certain statements alleging that the Eknath Shinde faction "bought the Shiv Sena symbol" for Rs. 2000 crores.
Senior Advocate Rajiv Nayyar appearing for Shewale prayed the court to pass an injunction order to restrain Raut and others from making any further defamatory allegations. However, Justice Prateek Jalan said that an order will be passed only after having the response of parties.
“These are political fights going on...as far as the institutions are concerned, Election commission's shoulders are broad enough to deal with all this. Like the courts, people say all kinds of things about the courts,” Justice Jalan orally remarked.
As Nayar said that the allegations shock conscience of the court, the court said:
“The question is not whether it shocks my conscience or not. The question is that in the free marketplace of ideas, are people entitled to say things which might shock my conscience?”
Court: Mr. Nayar, I am not for a moment commenting if the allegations are right or wrong...I am only saying that that question I'll determine after having an affidavit on record….. I don't want to pass a gag order on day one.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Delhi HC quashes summoning order issued against online portal The Wire’s Editor and Deputy Editor in defamation case filed by ex JNU professor Amita Singh.
Singh had alleged that the publication imputed that she prepared dossier depicting JNU is a “Den of Organised Sex Racket”.
Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani quashed the summoning order dated January 07, 2017 issued by a MM Court.
The court observed that it was unable to discern as to how the subject publication can be said to have defamed Singh.
In her complaint, Singh referred to an article published by The Wire and alleged that its Editor did not verify the authenticity of the Dossier and used it for monetary benefits of its magazine, thereby defaming her reputation.
Petitioner: They should atleast give us a 6 month window. After 6 months, the rule can be implemented in a just and fair manner. Technology is always an enabler, it cannot be a disabler.
Over 350 lawyers from #SupremeCourt and various HCs issue a statement condemning the comment of Law Minister Kiren Rijiju that "few retired judges belong to anti-India gang".
"Such hectoring and bullying are unbecoming of the high office held by the Minister", the lawyers say.
"By threatening retired judges, the Law Minister is clearly sending a message to every citizen, that no voice of dissent will be spared.
We may remind the Minister that criticism of the government is neither against the nation, nor unpatriotic, nor “anti-India” "- statement adds
Some of the signatories of the statement. #SupremeCourt
CJI DY Chandrachud: ASG has submitted that Jharkhand has submitted report. Chattisgarh is yet to file compliance. Mr Sodhi says that Chattisgarh has already complied. Copy of the same shall be furnished to ASG during the next week.
Adv Gonsalves: Since 2020 attacks on Christians have increased. Tehseen Poonawala guidelines said that nodal officers must see if the FIR is registered. Nodal officers are notified but nodal officers are registering not a single case.