GPs "research" is the usual misinformation abt how bitcoin works & energy use that has been debunked by *real* climate activists in Bitcoin
> 50% of Bitcoin's network is ZERO emissions, period. Emissions are DECLINING. Carbon NEGATIVE is coming. See 👇🏽 2/ batcoinz.com/beest/
GP is 'concerned' Bitcoin is accelerating a climate crisis, fueled by "Big Finance"
... If GP was truly concerned about the impact of Big Finance, they would focus on legacy finance's carbon emissions (see next tweets) 3/
If Greenpeace was acting in good faith, they would conduct 🍎:🍎 accounting, which shows that Bitcoin is #cleantech from a lower energy use & carbon emissions perspective
Bitcoin is a drop in the bucket vs the legacy system & stores of value it *replaces* 4/
If @Greenpeace was acting in good faith, they'd recognize that the carbon emissions associated w/ "Big Finance" from lending, underwriting, & investment activities are more than 700x higher than a financial institution’s direct emissions 5/
If @Greenpeace was acting in good faith, it would identify conflicts of interest
Ultimately we have facts on our side & a growing arsenal of projects
From Texas, to LATAM, to Africa, #Bitcoin's helping accelerate #renewables, building sustainable microgrids, addressing methane emissions, reusing waste, & even protecting gorillas 8/ medium.com/@mgronowska/mi…
Bitcoin's code provides for an optimal env outcome
Instead of the stick (env regs), which haven't succeeded to date, Bitcoin is the carrot: economic incentives (mining rewards) to help achieve the transition to a low carbon economy
ERCOTs new study shows that Bitcoin miners are providing a benefit to the Texas grid
🧵👇🏼
The Texas grid operator ERCOT just released a report that evaluates the adequacy of installed generation capacity for the winter based on historic data + several risk scenario forecasts (eg extreme demand, low wind, extreme peak load)
2/
The ERCOT report shows that Bitcoin miners are predicted to provide (ie curtail) 1.7GW to help meet winter peak demand in Texas 3/
Beyond the loss of privacy, this harms the ability of smaller service providers (software wallets, domestic exchanges, etc) to compete w/ large global providers (exchanges, defi/cefi)
Reg burden is a moat. This is BAD FOR CONSUMERS, as it limits choice
2/
Compliance is expensive. FATF guidance is implemented diff by countries, benefiting large players w/ an army of lawyers
Small co will need to increase their fees; others will close shop
This is BAD FOR INNOVATION, as often small co differentiate w new/better ideas & services
3/
w/ BIP85 u can create & ultra-securely back up a master seed & then use that to derive 1000s of mnemonic seeds that you can import to mobile/software wallets (Bitcoin, but yes even alts)
3/
#Bitcoin is a cross-cutting technology. It impacts multiple industries in our economy:
🔸️ Financial services
🔸️ Energy
🔸️ Manufacturing
🔸️ Government (& governance)
& many others indirectly due to economic incentives that incent waste reduction & resource optimization
1/
Big picture view: it's important to support the *whole* #Bitcoin ecosystem
This promotes economies of scale, allows for the creation of a global hub, & strengthens talent attraction & retention, all in a virtuous cycle
2/
In this #Bitcoin bull run, don't underestimate the added impact on available BTC supply from: 1. #BitcoinMiners ⛏️ aggressively HODLing 2. BTC getting locked up on the #LightningNetwork ⚡️
🧵👇🏽
NA miners are leveraging capital markets (debt & equity) for equipment upgrades & expansion
Miners have never had so many options (both debt & equity) vs prior halving epochs, alleviating the need to sell #Bitcoin
Building a BTC treasury is a winning capital markets strategy 2/
China's mining ban has been a boon to North American miners. Bolstered by the resulting difficulty drop, NA miners have been accumulating record levels of BTC
BUT newly mined Bitcoin are increasingly HODLed by public miners vs sold on markets, contributing to supply squeezes 3/