1/13- I always thought that synthetic hydrogels were relatively limited in terms of how physiologically representative they are.
2/13 - Synthetic hydrogels are typically linear elastic, which is cool, because it makes my life easier while doing Traction Force Microscopy (TFM) on them 🤓... but they don't display strain stiffening characteristics as they are non-fibrous.
3/13 - 🛠️Cells in natural hydrogels, like collagen, reorient fibers around them, and they can mechanically communicate with other cells that are at a certain distance from them by remodeling and stiffening the matrix in their surroundings
But it turns out that I was wrong...
4/13 - Polyisocyanide (PIC) hydrogels actually display many of those features that are so relevant to mimic physiological conditions within in vitro models!
And you can still tune their mechanical properties very easily!
In this paper we showed some of those features:
5/13 - First of all, we saw that cells remodel the matrix, densifying the peri-cellular region, very similarly as they do in collagen hydrogels.
🧐Look:
6/13 - We also saw that they even create channels of remodeled matrix behind them as they migrate:
7/13 - Then, of course🤓, we used #TFMLAB to measure the 3D hydrogel deformations induced by cell forces💪💪
💚I am particularly very excited about these results because it is the first time that TFMLAB has been used in an external lab and it has proven to be quite handy!
🧐
8/13 - Those displacement field patterns looked very much like what I typically see in collagen hydrogels, with slow decays as you move away form the cell.
But to be sure, we also showed displacement fields in collagen and matrigel:
9/13-We also quantified cell volume, sphericity, the number of cell protrusions, their length, and the differences in matrix displacements and we saw that there are barely any differences between PIC and collagen.
The way I understand this is: cells are equally happy in both 😍
10/13 - Btw, you might wonder how did we quantify those parameters in 3D data.
We developed fully automated custom-codes for it.
If you need similar stuff, I still have the codes, just contact me😉
🧐Look at this of the automatic segmentation of cell protrusions:
11/13 - We also did an algorithm to segment cells in 3D and that are touching each other. It is sometimes tricky, but we wrote something based on watersheds that worked beautifully:
Image shows projections, but it works in 3D (which allows to quantify 3D morphological stuff)
12/13 - A reminder that #TFMLAB is open source and that you can download the code here:
13/13 - I'm sharing also the nice thread that the main PI of the project, @Rocha_Lab , shared when the preprint was out. She explains more things there:
Last April I defended my #PhD at @KU_Leuven, in which I developed ways of looking at the #Force within your cells...
(1/20) 🧵In this #ThesisThread I will tell you exactly how I did it...
(2/20) No, at least in our galaxy, our cells do not have #midichlorians. But all ~30 trillion cells of your body are able to:
🔍Change their behavior if they #feel changes in the forces around them...
💪Exert #forces to move or to explore the environment
(3/20) Let me give you an example:
🚀When astronauts spend time in space, their bones become weaker! This means that the cells of their bones take a decision when they don't feel the #gravity anymore!
If there is no need, why should cells bother and maintain bones?
Hello!
(1/7)
I'm thrilled to share my new article in @SoftXJournal !!
We present TFMLAB! An open source Matlab toolbox for 4D #TractionForceMicroscopy. We put special focus on making it accessible, even if you are not good at programming! 💻🧐
(2/7) There are many available open source codes to run 2D TFM, but what if you are now thinking of embedding your cells in a 3D matrix? You won't find that many #3DTFM codes out there that are easy to use without requiring you to be an expert programmer🧐💻
(3/7) Well, we have created #TFMLAB 🥳!! This Matlab toolbox integrates all the computational steps to compute active cellular forces from confocal microscopy images, including image processing, cell segmentation, matrix displacement measurement and force recovery
In our work in @ActaBio we propose a more sophisticated way of validating #3D#TractionForceMicroscopy methods and we apply our novel inverse method to an in vitro model of #angiogenesis (1/10)
👇👇🧵
Typically, TFM methods are validated under simplified scenarios (using simplified cell geometries, arbitrarily choosing force exertion points, or bypassing image processing steps). Here, we designed a simulation platform that is as close as possible to a real case. (2/10)
We used the geometry of a real angiogenic sprout via confocal microscopy. We simulated focal adhesions of varying size and distribution (to see how the accuracy is affected by it) and generated different ground truth displacements and tractions. (3/10)