@AmishaShriv the method adopted before this Court of providing such information in a sealed cover with material particulars is mandatory in terms of law...It ought to have been complied with by the plaintiff, in order to seek ad-interim reliefs from this Court: #BombayHighCourt
@AmishaShriv There has to be clear-cut, specific description and data with the Court pertaining to the information in which the plaintiff claims confidentiality: #BombayHighCourt
@AmishaShriv In the absence of such clear-cut information and material, furnished by the plaintiff before the Court, there would be no basis for examining the allegations leveled against the defendants: #BombayHC
@AmishaShriv plaintiff is seeking confidentiality in all kinds of material, including the documents concerning products, research, development, manufacturing, trade secrets, contracts, operations, technical drawings, inventions, discoveries etc, without providing details: #BombayHighCourt
@AmishaShriv The plaintiff did not make any effort to place on record details
regarding such confidential information before this Court...the ad-interim order in such wide manner could not have been passed by this Court: #BombayHighCourt
@AmishaShriv This Court cannot countenance such breach of privacy under the garb of execution of the ad-interim order (to search all of defendants' premises and seize all documents and electronic devices): #BombayHC
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sr Adv CD Vaidyanathan (for Respondents) : Please allow me to file a reply. Can there be a permanent Prohibition? There can be ban during a health emergency but no total Prohibition.
Sr Adv Abhishek Singhvi: Previous State notification expired years ago.
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal for govt: If it is injurious to public can the year on year argument be used? Can cancer depend on it?
Bench: Why don't you ban it permanently?
Sibal: That's for the Centre.
Bench: What you can't do directly? Can you do it indirectly?
'Commander in Thief' - Bombay High Court to shortly hear Rahul Gandhi's plea seeking quashing of an FIR in Mumbai for his alleged defamatory remarks against PM Narendra Modi
Sr Adv AM Singhvi: A PIL by a political leader will get transferred to CBI. Point two, the writ is filed on 27th and the order is passed on 28th. Third, in counter before HC I've denied the allegations.
Singhvi: Your lordships have not given them a chance! How can the probe be transferred? What is the point of jurisdictional bar if CBI can enter your area without consent?
'MEDIEVIAL CONSERVATIVE MINDSET on CONCEPT of FAMILY'
#BombayHighCourt sets aside order disallowing a divorcee from adopting sister’s child on the ground that she was a SINGLE WORKING WOMAN and wouldn’t be able to give personal attention to the #child.
“Generally, a single parent is bound to be a working person, maybe with some rare exceptions. Thus, by no stretch of the imagination, a single parent can be held to be ineligible to be an adoptive parent on the ground that he/she is a working person.” - #BombayHighCourt
The comparison done between the biological mother being a housewife and the prospective adoptive mother (single parent) being a working lady reflects a mindset of the medieval conservative concepts of a family...
[Plea alleging attacks against Christians in India in #SupremeCourt]
SG Mehta: Please see the compliance. The petitioner claimed that there are some 500 incidents where Christians were attacked. We sent everything to State government.
SG Mehta: We collated all information we got. First let's see Bihar. The total number which Petitioner gave are internal fights between neighbours one of which happens to be Christian - this they have resolved.
SG Mehta: Wherever actual offence was committed, that has been noted. The figure given by them, which obviously persuaded your lordships, was not correct.