2/ Comparing the numbers in this report with the total student numbers reported to the public & to the feds is particularly alarming, because the report shows that a full 20% of the unqualified teachers are working in special ed, whereas....
3/ ...special ed students account for only 0.8% of Oregon's total student population. Granted, they should have a higher teacher-student ratio. But not a higher unqualified teacher ratio.
4/ For the numbers we compare the report's pie chart: 131 unqualified emergency special ed teachers in 2021 vs 524 unqualified emergency teachers in general ed, for a total of 655, of which the 131 in special ed represent 20%...
5/ ....to total student numbers obtained from two sources--the first an Oregon Dept of Ed report on the total number of special ed students in the state for 2021, being 6,845...
6/ ....and a second being a KTZI news report reflecting total Oregon student population for that same time period...
7/ Using the KTZI total of 560,917, that brings the percentage of special ed students for that time period to 1.2% (6,845/560,917 x 100)...
8/ Note that the KTZI article reflects a 3.7% drop in overall enrollment for 2021, the ODE reports reflect almost double that--a 6% drop--in special ed students over the same period (from 7258 in 2020 to 6845 in 2021)...
9/ The ODE numbers also reflect a 33% drop in the total of special ed students in the five-year period from 2016 to 2021; it would be interesting to know if that's worse than the total student drop in that period, but I'd have to dig to find those totals...
10/ ...Point being that it looks like disabled students are being lost more rapidly than non-disabled students, yet Oregon is failing to retain enough qualified teachers even to handle their rapidly falling numbers...
11/ ...This is consistent with my own family's experience, as our disabled child lost much of her support during her last two years of school in #Portland; and experienced abusive treatment at the hands of those who were left after COVID.
2/ This new decision rightly accuses the Supreme Court of unconstitutionally legislating from the bench (only US Congress can make new laws; court's can't) in its 2020 Bostock decision, which used verbal obfuscation and tortured logic....
3/ ...to claim that, fifty years ago, when Congress passed Title IX against sex discrimination in education, it also meant to include gender self-identification.
Of course, it didn't. And the Supreme Court knows it. (Read the dissenting opinions in Bostock; they're scathing.) ..
THREAD: As a health information worker who regularly reviews records involving gender-reassignment patients, I can't stress enough the harm to medical accuracy of neo-pronouns.
The purpose of the medical record is, first and foremost, to ensure the accurate dissemination of information necessary for the continuation of the patient's care.
Neo-pronouns and "nonbinary" theys aren't just annoying; they're potentially harmful.
For example, when records refer to the patient by saying "they is" planning something, the reader instinctively recognizes that as a typo and now wonders, who is planning? The patient? The family? The hospital?
THREAD: My #GenderCritical thoughts on how to constitutionally handle gender religion, and its pronouns and whatnot, in schools:
<rant>
(1) Gender ideology IS a religion. It is a faith-based, nonscientific, gnostic-dualist belief system about the soul...
(2) ...specifically, about the corruption of the physical body vs the immutable purity of the gendered soul, with ritualistic practices (language & body modification) for attending to the needs of the gendered soul over the flaws of the sexed body.
(3) Fine. It's a free country. All religions are welcome and may freely exercise. But only up until the point that their free exercise starts to interfere with the constitutional rights of other individual citizens. Then, the state must protect others' rights as well.
THREAD: By a large margin, the French National Academy of Medicine has passed a resolution urging parents to be wary of social contagion, and recommending that gender care emphasize mental over physical interventions:
Notably, the position statement emphasizes that there is no test capable of distinguishing which patients will have lasting dysphoria vs. which will simply grow out of it.
Insights from evolutionary psychology re how newborns protect themselves from maternal self-interest by gaming maternal instincts in their favor via oxytocin. Biology is SO much smarter than we think we are:
"To defend against maternal infanticide, a newborn's best strategy...
2/ "...may be to display cues that it is a vehicle worthy of investment....Newborns who nurse in the first hour of birth stimulate a surge in maternal oxytocin levels [causing the nursing mother to] become less motivated to self-groom for the purposes of attracting a mate...
3/ "...and more motivated to groom their infants....By contrast, new mothers who do not nurse are more likely to suffer from postpartum depression,...a condition associated with higher rates of maternal infanticide...
THREAD: This was my kid to a T(rex), so thought I'd pull her favorite books off our shelf and list them, for any other parents whose kids need engaging books about biology and evolution:
2/ A good way to engross a child is to let them follow the paths of the early explorers--Cuvier's catalogs of animal drawings, Darwin's journey on the Beagle. Even those who got it wrong (Waterhouse) or who are just making up pretend biologies for fun (Olander's monsters)...
3/ Here are links to some of the books my daughter came back to again and again:
Dover edition of Cuvier's animal drawings (there are other Cuvier publications, but this is the most kid friendly):