Justinian and Belisarius: how was their relationship? Typically, historians emphasize animosity and conflict between the two elite Romans. I think this approaches their relationship from the wrong angle. Read on if interested. ⬇️ #Roman#Byzantine#History
For centuries, modern historians have argued that Justinian was jealous of Belisarius' successes and sought to undermine him whenever possible to limit his achievement. We can trace this argument at least back to Gibbon, but it is still present in a book as recent as 2021.
On what basis might modern historians be making this claim? On multiple occasions, Procopius and Agathias note that other military officers or government officials were jealous of Belisarius' success, and so they slandered him to Justinian.
It seems that there is an assumption among modern historians that Justinian himself was therefore also jealous of Belisarius and his successes, even though this is not made explicit by ancient sources.
Modern historians also assume jealousy from the two disgraces of Belisarius at the order of Justinian. In 542, B was fired from his position as General of the East and held in disgrace for months. 20 years later, in 562, B was deprived of his honors and disgraced for months.
There is no doubt that these were instances where the relationship between Belisarius and Justinian was at a low ebb. Clearly, to give orders like this Justinian must have been angry and distrusted Belisarius at the moment, and Belisarius might have resented the punishment.
But these two occasions stand out precisely because they were out of the norm. Over the long run of their lives, the relationship of Belisarius and Justinian was cordial and productive! Let's talk for a minute about just how long this relationship lasted.
Belisarius first appears in the service of Justinian as a guardsman in 526, but given his relative seniority in the guards, it is likely he had already been in service with Justinian before this date. We cannot be sure for how long.
On the other end, Belisarius and Justinian both died in 565. This means that their professional relationship lasted about 40 years!
Now, we cannot be sure the two men were close for all of those 40 years. Belisarius last served Justinian in a military capacity in 559, and there is no mention in any source of Belisarius and the emperor interacting after the former's restoration from disgrace in July 563.
But even if we take as a smaller bounds the time between Belisarius' first mention in Justinian's service (526) and his last (559), 33 years is still an exceptionally long time for a professional relationship between two powerful, elite Roman men.
And it is worth emphasizing that unlike the endings of some long-term relationships between other powerful Romans (Aetius and Valentinian III come to mind), both Belisarius and Justinian died peacefully in their beds. This relationship did not end in violence.
That Belisarius and Justinian worked together for so long, through stress, triumph, and despair (both professional and personal) is nothing short of remarkable. When considered this way, it is the stability of their relationship that stands out, not their brief disagreements. Fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Travel in the ancient and medieval Roman world came with a twist: trips of greater distance could be accomplished in less time than trips of shorter distance depending on certain variables. Read this 🧵 for the general rules of Roman travel time. #Roman#Byzantine#History
I once described the journey from Constantinople to Dara in Mesopotamia as "particularly cumbersome." The itinerary that best combined comfort and speed was to sail from Constantinople around the coast of Anatolia to Seleukia by the Sea, and then proceed overland to Dara.
This trip covered ~2,150 kilometers and took about 18 days. This trip was about the longest one could take and still be within the Eastern Roman Empire. The map below shows routes from Constantinople to other major sites within the empire which were ALL shorter in duration.
Belisarius and Antonina were extremely well-traveled individuals. Between 528 and 548, for instance, Belisarius was away from Constantinople for part or all of 19 of these years. Antonina was away from Constantinople for part or all of 14 of these years. #Byzantine#History
The destinations of their travels are generally well-known: the Roman East (particularly Roman Mesopotamia and Syria), North Africa, and Italy. Of all these locations, they both spent by far the most time in Italy (about 11 years).
Of course none of this travel was for pleasure. It was all in the service of Belisarius' military career. In the majority of these years, Belisarius held the title of General of the East, even while fighting in the West.
Sometime in December 533, Belisarius fought his second major battle against the Vandals of North Africa. Let's take a close look at the Battle of Tricamarum to see how Belisarius won this battle and with it the war. #BelisariusAndAntonina#Byzantine#History
First, for context, I gently remind you that in September I tweeted all about Belisarius' arrival in North Africa and the beginning of his campaign against the Vandals. If you want to review, this is the thread of threads that collects it all together:
Following his triumphant entry into Carthage on September 15, 533, Belisarius remained in the city. It was not until December that he moved out, ready to fight what all must have assumed to be the climactic battle against the Vandals.
December 9: #OTD in 536, Belisarius and the Roman army entered Rome. It was a remarkable moment. As the historian Procopius wrote, "after a space of sixty years Rome again became subject to the Romans." Some thoughts in this 🧵 #BelisariusAndAntonina#Byzantine#History
First, a brief reminder of the context: Belisarius had landed in Sicily in summer 535. The island and all of Italy were part of the Kingdom of the Ostrogoths. The emperor Justinian charged Belisarius with restoring Roman authority to these lands.
After occupying Sicily in 535, Belisarius crossed the Strait of Messina into the toe of Italy in 536. Most of southern Italy submitted immediately to the Roman army, but Naples held out until it was captured, probably in late November 536.
December 5: #OTD in 562, Belisarius suffered his last disgrace at the hands of an aging Justinian. Belisarius, by this point retired for more than a decade, was implicated in a plot to murder the emperor. Was he guilty? A 🧵 #BelisariusAndAntonina#Byzantine#History
In November 562, three men devised a conspiracy to assassinate Justinian: Ablabios, a musician, Marcellos, a banker, and Sergios, the nephew of an important senator named Aitherios. This was not exactly a roster of the elites of the elites of Constantinopolitan society.
The plot, which was to stab Justinian to death in the evening while he sat in the palace triclinium (dining room), was amateurish and quickly detected by palace guards, who arrested all three men before they came close to ambushing the emperor.
On or around this date in 536, the Roman army of Belisarius stormed the city of Naples and put many to the sword, ending a 21 day siege and opening up the road to the Eternal City. Why such a bloody resolution to this siege? Read on. #Roman#Byzantine#History#Italy 🇮🇹
When Belisarius and the Roman army arrived before Naples, they were riding a string of successes. Cities across Sicily and southern Italy had submitted immediately and willingly to the Roman force, as I described in the quoted tweet below.
In fact, it is hard to escape the conclusion that Belisarius' march from the toe of Italy to Naples must have taken on the character of a victory parade. And yet, here at Naples, the Roman army would encounter its first real resistance.