Let's talk about how public health measures are impacting human rights, specifically for Clinically Vulnerable people and households.
1/
Masks are a vital protection for those with health conditions. The withdrawal of masks in healthcare is concerning.
Clinically Vulnerable people have lost freedoms and are facing discrimination in: workplaces; schools; court hearings & job centres; without remote options.
2/
'Personal responsibility' can't replace public health. Clinically Vulnerable people are unfairly burdened to protect themselves, while being denied basic rights.
This breaches their rights under Article 14 of the HRA, which guarantees the right to non-discrimination.
3/
Decisions presented as *choices* - but with no viable options - have meant that #3Years since lockdown our members continue to live reduced lives.
@RishiSunak's government do not care for vulnerable people & they don't want you to hear us.
π§΅
We have lost our JOBS and HOMES.
By not making workplaces safe Clinically Vulnerable people have had to choose between lives and livelihoods.
One in four severely immunosuppressed people reported having lost a job due to the risks from Covid.
Most *chose* to quit.
2/
We have lost SCHOOLING.
Over half of Clinically Vulnerable Families report being encouraged by schools / local education authorities to withdraw their children from education by threatening fines and prosecutions.
β οΈ Clinically Vulnerable people are struggling.
We are * 3οΈβ£ YEARS * into a pandemic (ask the @WHO) and our needs have not been addressed.
Protections were withdrawn one by one and the removal of these measures has unfairly disadvantaged us.
1/
We are STILL HOME.
We are living part lives.
Our freedoms have been lost.
If you are not in a vulnerable group this information will likely have slipped you by. You will not have noticed us struggling because we are no longer in your view.
2/
We move around like ninjas.
We avoid crowded places.
We probably don't meet with you any more.
This is not through choice. This has been thrust upon us, by the same government that joked they would
"Let the bodies pile high in their hundreds of thousands.".
3/
We are concerned about the abrupt end to the Covid-19 Infection Survey which we feel will unfairly result in barriers and disadvantages to protected groups:
Disabled (those who are Clinically Vulnerable), Elderly and Ethnic Minorities.
@janemerrick23 explained the gold
standard' survey has been key to our
surveillance. The @WHO have not declared
an end to the pandemic and lives remain
under threat of death & serious injury (Long
Covid).
We need this information to risk assess. It also provides essential information on the impacts on our members.
When the government told us last year to Live with Covid they took away testing and isolation, measures that protected us all from infection and reinfection.
The prosecutions related to absences from a time *before* these highly vulnerable children were vaccinated.
The parents went to court, initially before Christmas without representation due to incredibly short notice (postal strikes were blamed).
They pleaded "NOT GUILTY".
2/
However, they were (like our previous family) also taken to a side room and advised to plead guilty by the prosecution lawyer. They were also told that they didn't need legal representation as nobody else usually does in these cases.
3/