But more importantly, the #HockeyStick was not only validated, but extended using independent data and methods in subsequent years, leading the @theNASciences (of which I'm now proud to be a member) to subsequently reaffirm our findings: nature.com/articles/44110…
The attacks on the iconic graph by climate change deniers, fossil fuel front groups and their hired guns would nonetheless continue on, leading me to publish "The Hockey Stick & the Climate Wars" (2012; @ColumbiaUP) about my experiences: amazon.com/Hockey-Stick-C… #HSCW
By 2008, there was a veritable "Hockey League" of reconstructions each of which indicated that global/hemispheric warmth over the past few decades was unprecedented for at last the past millennium and likely longer: pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pn…
Subsequent work by the #PAGES2k team of ~80 scientists around the world using expanded data and refined methods produced the most authoritative reconstruction to date (nature.com/articles/ngeo1…). It was virtually indistinguishable from the #HockeyStick:
The #PAGES2k group would expand and refine their own work, extending the original #HockeyStick conclusion, i.e. the recent warmth is likely unprecedented in at last the past 2000 years: nature.com/articles/sdata…
The @IPCC_CH, in its 2021 6th Assessment report SPM (ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1…) would feature an extended version of the #HockeyStick, concluding that "Human influence has warmed the climate at a rate that is unprecedented in at least the last 2000 years" https://t.co/andW6AbO42
Here (from my commentary in @TIME magazine: time.com/6088531/ipcc-c…) is a direct comparison of the #HockeyStick graphs shown in the 2001 @IPCC_CH 3rd assessment report and 2021 6th assessment report Summary for Policymakers (SPM):
Months later, a team of scientists publishing in the same journal (@Nature) that published the original #HockeyStick, would extend it back in time more than 20,000 years, showing that recent warming is likely unprecedented over this much longer time frame: nature.com/articles/s4158
Here's an article I published a couple year ago in @PNAS_news discussing the lessons we can learn from the common era of the past two millennia that go *beyond" the #HockeyStick graph: pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pn…
1. Many proponents said it's unclear whether the public would respond negatively or positively to the protests. It's clear that it is the former, regardless of partisan affiliation, gender, etc.
2. Others said that public opinion was skewed by the fact that much media coverage suggested the paintings were damaged when in fact they weren't. Turns out it makes no difference.
A few highlights of the study:
⚡️A plurality of respondents (46%) say disruptive non-violent actions decrease their support for efforts to address climate change, while only 13% say that these actions increase their support.
⚡️69% of Republicans report that these non-violent, disruptive protests decrease their support for climate action, compared to only 27% among Democrats. It is noteworthy however that even Democrats are more likely to report a decrease (27%) than an increase (21%) in support.
My visit to the @MainLineArtCtr today to see their "Risky Beauty: Aesthetics & Climate Change" exhibit | Thanks to curator Dr. Cynthia Haveson Veloric for the one-on-one tour! 🧵
Art plays a critical role in communicating affectively, complementing the more cerebral approaches based on facts & figures. I loved the way this exhibit paired hope & urgency:
The exhibit features the wonderful work of DIANE BURKO (@DianeBurko), STACY LEVY (@stacylevyart), DEIRDRE MURPHY, TIM PORTLOCK, AMIE POTSIC & HIRO SAKAGUCHI. The approaches range from abstract to photorealism.
I am pleased to report that the manager of the hotel has gotten back to me and has informed me that this is NOT the policy of this @Marriott (i.e. to have a single, namely Fox, news channel on the TVs in the fitness facility as was the case yesterday). 🧵
He informed me that, contrary to what the presiding employee indicated yesterday, the channels CAN be changed in response to the requests of their guests (yesterday Fox was the only news channel; the rest were sports channels).
I take him at his word, and I am pleased to hear this. I So I do not hold this incident against either this Marriott hotel or the @Marriott chain, and neither should you.
1. The Hockey Stick grows longer, blade grows sharper. Recent warmth may be unprecedented in at least 100,000 years (see my @Time op-ed for further details: time.com/6088531/ipcc-c…) #IPCC#AR6
2. Impacts of climate change are now "widespread and pervasive". Climate change is NOW causing amplified weather extremes of the sort we’ve been witnessing this summer — droughts, heat waves, wildfires, floods, superstorms. The IPCC unambiguously connects the dots this time:
It's fascinating to read the thoughtful commentary by the students quoted in the piece. Both individual and collective action are of course important, and it's easy to lose sight of that in these discussions. Nuance here matters.
What I note in The #NewClimateWar is that individual actions are important, but an *exclusive* focus on individual behavior alone can crowd out needed discussion about systemic change/policy: