10] Seems to me, that Bacteria/Fungus and those pesky unicorn
"Viruses" that nobody can see nor categorize properly, are less contagious than Laughs/ Yawns/Menstrual Cycles, lol. Just so you guys are aware, Cell Culture Goop and or Samples of sick fluid IS NOT A VIRUS.
11] (Especially when you can't see it in the sample, but even if you saw some particles, that begs the question).
12] Another interesting tidbit from @Humanley- "In
1920 - Cecil et al. believed influenza was caused by a bacteria and exposed healthy men to Pfieffer's bacillus, the bacteria many doctors believed at the time was the cause of the flu.
13] Interestingly, all 12 healthy participants fell ill with influenza-like-illness". How is this possible when the cause of "the Flu" is a "virus'?
14] Someone on Twitter recently said to me that these experiments failed because
"They only cultured bacteria not a virus", even though not only is that VERIFIABLY false if you read the studies yourself, 1/
15] the genetic material from spit/coughs/mucus/breathing and sneezing on someone would PRESUMABLY contain a virus right? 2/
16] They did not "just culture bacteria", in fact most of the experiments didn't do that, and simply looked at methods of contagion with direct uncultured clinical samples.
17] You can induce many influenza symptoms with tons of different compounds, including foreign genetic material, Cultured bacteria, water/saline etc. Are all of these viruses?
Do you know why they give the flu shot away from free?
Because the “Flu Shot” contains *toxic ingredients* that can make you sick. It creates future customers… That’s why they give it away for free.
1] Here is the list of vaccine ingredients per the
CDC website. This table includes not only vaccine ingredients (e.g., adjuvants and preservatives), but also substances used during the manufacturing process, including vaccine-production media. 👇🏾👇🏾
1] The only dis-eases we fear are the ones that a vaccine has been developed & marketed for. We never feared measles and mumps in the early 20th century... the media tells us what to fear, so they can then sell you an alleged solution.
2] There are literally THOUSANDS of dis-ease symptoms. Take Leprosy for instance.
Step 1 -The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy organisms(Has never been done). Virologists claim Koch’s postulate has been fulfilled yet not one can show a paper with the independent variable.🤔
Step 2 -The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in “PURE” culture.
Here’s a example of a “IMPURE” culture. A “PURE” culture wouldn’t contain what’s highlighted in the image below. *Note (this has also never been done) 👇🏾
Step 3 -The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a healthy organism.
Antoine Béchamp was able to scientifically prove that germs are the chemical by-products and constituents of pleonorphic microorganisms enacting upon the unbalanced, malfunctioning cell metabolism and dead tissue that actually produces disease. 🧵 🤓
Bechamp found that the diseased, neidic, low-oxygen cellular environment is created by a toxic/nutrient deficient diet, toxic emotions, and a toxic lifestyle.
His findings demonstrate how cancer develops through the morbid changes of germs to bacteria, bacteria to viruses, viruses to fungal forms and fungal forms to cancer cells.
I never understood this but, how when a individual makes a positive claim such as “Viruses cause dis-ease” but want you to help them back their positive claim. If you have enough data to make such a claim you wouldn’t be asking any questions. The data should speak for you. 🧵
It should be so simple for these folks making claims such as this to shut us up who have many questions about the existence of these “infectious pathogens” but they can’t. It’s been over a century, one would think it wouldn’t be a problem at all.
When you make positive claims the burden of proof is on you. If you can’t provide enough data to support it, then it’s null. It doesn’t matter how many papers you present, if there is a mistake in the basic methodology, that’s a big problem. It should be treated as such.