#MadrasHighCourt to hear today pleas filed by All India Gaming Federation and Gameskraft Technologies Pvt Ltd challenging the Tamil Nadu law prohibiting online gambling and regulating online games in the State. #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
The bench of Acting Chief Justice T Raja and Justice Bharatha Chakravarthy will be hearing the pleas filed by the companies challenging the validity of the act and seeking a stay on its operation. #MadrasHighCourt #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
Senior Counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi appearing for one of the online rummy companies says that the Act is unconstitutional. Says that there is a watershed distinction between games of chance and skill. #MadrasHighCourt #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
Singhvi- Nothing can be 100% skill. Even in the game of bridge, there is a matter of chance on which card you get. Courts have held that when you have chance and skill, you have to look at predominance #madrashighcourt #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
Singhvi- Rummy is a game of skill. Stakes don't convert a game of skill into that of chance. The State are not competent to pass laws except in cases of games of chance #madrashighcourt #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
Singhvi- It is a case of disproportionate overbridge. Every evil is being attributed to rummy. There are social evils to drinking and lottery. But none of the States are banning that. #MadrasHighCourt #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
Singhvi- In the North, in our Diwali parties even we play games like rummy.
ACJ T Raja: Well, here we do not play rummy because we are aware of the nuisance of rummy. #MadrasHighCourt #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
ACJ Raja - Dr Singhvi, I'll surprise you, but in my village, just 20 kms away from Madurai, there's no drinking, no smoking. No alcohol or tobacco is sold. The Gandhi museum has adopted this village as a model village. #MadrasHighCourt #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
Singhvi- We are talking about data. There are so many health evils and social evils to drinking and lottery. But these are not being banned. Why specifically rummy. #MadrasHighCourt #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
ACJ Raja - You should understand that rummy is not fully banned. Only online rummy is banned. There is a difference between sitting in my home and playing rummy and playing it online. We don't know what's happening online. #MadrasHighCourt #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
Justice Bharatha Chakravarthy- Who shuffles the cards in online rummy?
Singhvi- There's an algorithm. In fact, online game is much more safer than the physical game. #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
Singhvi- If the activity itself is acceptable, making it online will not make it unacceptable. Online gaming makes it much more regulatable, controllable. We can monitor what is happening. #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
Singhvi-The Union Government has already brought in rules under the IT Act to deal with online games. The states thus do not have any power on the issue. #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
Senior Counsel Aryama Sundaram makes submission for All India Gaming Federation. Says that after #madrashc struck down an earlier amendment to the TN Gaming Act, the state is now trying to bring in a new act with same provisions. #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
Sundaram - The madras hc has held that a game of skill is not gambling. Even if there is incidental wagering. If it is actually betting and gambling, then it must be on chance, should not involve skill. #onlinegambling
Sundaram- There is no diff between cyberspace and physical.
ACJ Raja - Art 19 gives freedom of movement. But to reduce pollution, some states have brought in the odd/even scheme. It's not a prohibition, it's a regulation. The govt is doing something similar. #onlinegambling
Sundaram concludes his arguments by saying that all the concerns regarding online gaming had been addressed by the central government rules and the state has no authority to have a parallel legislation on the same. #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
Senior Counsel Kapil Sibal, appearing for the State of TN says that there is no concept of occupied field with respect to matters in List 1 and List 2. Says that under Entry 34 List 2, it is the State government that has power to make laws on betting and gambling #onlinegambling
Sibal- The Centre can make intermediary guidelines. State has authority to make laws. So it is the Union which is incompetent to make the laws and not the State as contended by the petitioners #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
Sibal- The petitioners have relied on the judgement in Sathyanarayana case. In that case, the court in fact said that though Rummy is a game of skill, if it involves gambling or brings in revenue to the owner of clubhouse, it can be prosecuted #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
Sibal - The online company's sole objective is to get money through the games..It is a matter of private interest vs. public interest. These platforms are there to make money and destroy the lives of family. #onlinegambling #onlinegaming
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#BombayHighCourt will hear stand-up comedian KUNAL KAMRA's plea to stay new amendment to IT Rules empowering the Central Govt. to identify 'Fake News' about itself in the social media.
Breaking: Gauhati High Court Denies Interim Protection For Now To Srinivas BV, National President - Indian Youth Congress in a Case filed by his Former Colleague under Sections 509/294/341/352/354/354A(iv)/506 of the IPC
Srinivas B V on Wednesday moved the Gauhati High Court seeking quashing of the FIR filed BY his former Colleague alleging harassment.
He has prayed for stay of the operation of the impugned FIR in Dispur P.S. Case No. 692/2023 as well as to direct Assam Police not to take any coercive steps/action against him.
Same-Sex Marriage| "Matter not b/w Govt and #SupremeCourt, it concerns citizens of India. It is a question of people's will. The will of the people is reflected in Parliament, state assemblies and in forums where elected people are there": Law Minister Kiren Rijiju (@KirenRijiju)
"If 5 wise men, decide something which is correct according to them, I can't make any kind of any adverse comment. But if people don't want it, you can't impose things on people. A sensitive matter like the institution of marriage has to be decided by the people of the country."
"#SupremeCourt can issues directions, fill vacuum but when it comes to a matter which affects every citizen of the country, then the Court is not the forum to decide on behalf of the people of the country": Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju (@KirenRijiju)
The court observed that "an institute (cannot) be permitted to force upon the Petitioner a name, identity or a gender that the Petitioner has chosen to reject in preference to some other,"
A division bench of Justices Gautam Patel and Neela Gokhale passed the order on transgender person's plea to retrospectively change their name in Tata Institute of Social Science's records and issue fresh certificates.
On 26th April 1973—half a century ago today—is the only day in the history of the Supreme Court that the Bar struck and called the action of the Government "a blatant and outrageous attempt at undermining the independence and impartiality of the judiciary.
It was the day Chief Justice A.N. Ray took over as Chief Justice of India—superseding three senior Justices, Justice J.M. Shelat, Justice K.S. Hegde and Justice A.N. Grove