You may have heard the term BRICS recently, and how this group of countries has taken issue with the USD
But what exactly—or should I say *who* exactly—are the BRICS, and can they really topple the USD?
Time for a US Dollar 🧵👇
🧐 What is BRICS?
First things first, BRICS is just an acronym for a group of countries seeking to form their own economic cooperation
A non-Western-centric bloc, you might say
These countries are currently, Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
BRICS.
The term BRIC was originally coined by Goldman Sachs economist Jim O’Neill in 2001, and when South Africa joined in 2010, it became BRICS
See, BRICS wants to break away from the need to hold and transact in USD
They're looking to do this for various reasons, but two are clear:
1. By continuing to use USDs as the primary medium of exchange, these countries continue to feed the US economic engine at the expense of their own economic growth
2. Needing USDs for transactions forces these countries to hold reserves of USD and USTs as reserve assets, and...
There're two reasons they’re want to opt out of USTs:
1. When the US sanctioned Russia last year, freezing their USTs and shutting them out from SWIFT (the worldwide money transfer system), the US demonstrated authoritarian control over any USD asset held in foreign treasuries.
2. The US Treasury has repeatedly printed USD to buy its own debt during times of crisis, and this has expanded the money supply and induced perpetual inflation
Hence, the USD is worth less every single year—and anyone holding USTs or USD loses purchasing power.
Pretty good reasons to opt out of the USD, actually
Instead, the BRICS alliance would like to either agree to transact in their own currencies or adopt a European-style model, where one currency (like the Chinese yuan) is the primary medium of exchange between all of them.
And so now, we are hearing increased rumblings, like this:
Simple, really: they all migrate away from holding US Treasuries and turn to other assets, like each others’ currencies, #gold, or #Bitcoin
And begin convincing others to do the same.
Evidence of this already occurring came recently when the United Arab Emirates (UAE) settled a large LNG (natural gas) trade with China, which was done in…wait for it…
Chinese yuan
Well, well.
Sounds ominous for the USD, when also considering the chart below
The GDP of BRICS countries recently surpassed the total GDP of the G7 countries.
uh oh
The question then becomes, could BRICS cause the USD to lose status as the global reserve currency?
But to answer that we must first ask, can BRICS unseat the US Treasury (UST) as the global reserve *asset*?
🤩BRICS → BRIICSS
Let’s be honest, UST's dominance as global reserve asset, while not exactly on the ropes, is in decline.
There're many reasons for this, but the past few years have not been kind to the US Treasury.
I.e., in response to US sanctions, Russia sold their USTs, China has been unwinding theirs, Japan has reduced USTs to stabilize their own currency, etc…
As a result, foreign ownership of USTs has decreased significantly as a percentage of total holders over the last decade:
And no surprise, the USD is headed in the same direction:
And to put this in context, the lost share is not going to the euro, the British pound, or the yen
It is going to ‘other currencies’, which includes the Chinese yuan.
First, let’s be clear. Take another peek at the above chart
There are hundreds of currencies in the world, and the USD is still *by far* the dominant medium of exchange
Nothing is even close.
But
This very dominance is causing certain countries to seek a way to be less dependent on the USD and the UST
To extract themselves from the whims and needs of a central bank that lives a world away from their own economy
Yet still finds a way to dominate it.
And so, as more countries seek to escape the US grip, we find other countries applying for ‘membership’ to the BRICS alliance
The two most recent inquiries came from Iran and Saudi Arabia
Iran is no surprise.
But wait, you say, the same Saudi Arabia that agreed to settle virtually all their oil trades in USD since we left the gold standard in the early 70’s?
Yes, one and the same
The resulting cooperative would be dubbed BRIICSS.
Problem is, they have no single currency they can all rely on (read: trust) for denominating an asset in, i.e., a UST
And unlike the UST (a mega yacht with a leaky hull), they must find a way to denominate in something they can all transact in that will also hold its value.
The obvious and overwhelmingly popular choice today?
Let’s look what’s been recently happening there, next.
🤔 BRIICS+ and the Prisoner’s Dilemma
Lo and behold, it seems Russia, China, India, and Turkey have been buying #gold like it’s the most important asset to have in their reserves.
More important than the US Treasury, in fact.
The result?
Good Lord, that’s more #gold buying than we’ve seen since the 1960s
I mean, central banks had been net *sellers* of #gold throughout all the 1990s and early 2000s.
Of course, the WEF sugarcoats reality here, reasoning that central banks have been using #gold to ‘balance’ reserves and ‘diversify’ portfolios
But let’s look at what really happened.
It’s clear that this reversal in sentiment occurred right after the Great Financial Crisis
You know, that little global financial meltdown event that ‘required’ central banks to step in and rescue companies
Rescue banks.
Translated: they printed metric sh*t-tons of their respective currencies and flooded markets with them to ensure the charade, the whole cynical clown show, continues.
Remember:
printing money = debasement, and debasement = loss of purchasing power
To protect against this loss of purchasing power, central banks have been buying, er, loading up on #gold.
It’s entirely possible that these countries (and others) have been also loading up on (or eyeing the possibility of using) #Bitcoin for an additional reserve asset and/or medium of exchange.
After all, it’s easier to exchange and cheaper to move than gold. It’s instantly verifiable for audit purposes, and most importantly, it cannot be frozen or seized.
Seems like a natural progression, actually
And if you have been watching the hashrate of #Bitcoin, you've noticed that it has exploded this past year
Translated for Bitcoin beginners: more computers are being plugged in to mine #Bitcoin.
It’s pure speculation that the majority of these Bitcoin miners are coming from China (I know, I know, they banned 'mining' last year 🙄) and Russia (it’d be pretty easy to hide a few million ASICS in Siberia), but it would seem to make sense, wouldn’t it?
OK, back to the main discussion here, and the expansion of BRICS which may become BRIICSS (BRICS + Iran + Saudi Arabia).
Then what? Will more countries seek to join? Could we see a BRIICSS+?
To put it simply, any country who is on the geopolitical relationship fringe with the United States may soon find themselves in an awkward situation
A dilemma
A *prisoner’s dilemma*, you may even say.
If you’ve never analyzed game theory and the prisoner’s dilemma, here’s how it works:
Say we have two countries, Country A and Country B
Each country has two choices: maintain its current USD reliance (cooperate) or join BRICS in the hopes of challenging the USD system (defect)
There are four possible outcomes of a prisoner’s dilemma:
1. Both countries cooperate (maintain USD holdings):
In this scenario, both countries continue to rely on the USD as a global reserve currency, and the status quo is maintained
USD remains dominant.
2. Both countries defect (join BRICS):
If both countries reduce USD dependence in favor of a BRICS system, they collectively challenge the USD's dominance
This leads to a reduction in demand for USD-denominated assets (read: USTs) and increased probability that BRICS succeeds.
3. Country A cooperates, Country B defects:
In this case, Country B benefits from diversifying its reserves and potentially profiting from price appreciation of gold/Bitcoin, while Country A continues to rely on the USD
(cont'd)
Country B's move could still negatively impact the USD, but the effect would likely be smaller than if both countries shifted their holdings
Neither country fully benefits, BRICS likely ultimately fails.
4. Country A defects, Country B cooperates:
This scenario is the just reverse of outcome 3, with the same result.
Put simply, it would take a massive—a seismic shift—in behavior and significant transfer of assets to #gold and/or #Bitcoin for BRICS to succeed, IMO
Could it happen?
Sure. It’s absolutely a possibility and more than a non-zero probability.
🤯 Could BRIICS+ lead to hyperbitcoinization?
Back to game theory and challenging the UST as the global reserve asset.
While gold is a trusted (non-UST) SoV, and has been for centuries, it's still not ideal, especially in this digital day and age, and is unlikely the world ever fully returns to the #gold standard
Decentralized, trustless, easily divisible, and easily transferred, #Bitcoin’s properties are like gold that has evolved into the digital age
Of course there're additional base layer protocol benefits, but today let's look at #Bitcoin as a store of value and means of exchange.
Let’s suppose that the BRICS countries ultimately turn to #Bitcoin as the main reserve asset of their currencies (or a collective currency, like a #Bitcoin-backed yuan)
Then, if BRICS becomes BRIICSS+, the US will find itself in its own version of the prisoner’s dilemma.
In short, the US will have to decide whether to adopt #Bitcoin as part of its national reserves (cooperate) or maintain the status quo (defect)
Using the US and BRIICSS+ as the two players in this game, There are four possible outcomes:
1. Both US and BRIICSS+ cooperate (adopt Bitcoin):
The USD becomes backed by #Bitcoin and though #Bitcoin becomes the global reserve asset, the USD remains the global reserve currency.
2. Both US and BRIICSS+ defect (maintain the status quo):
Neither the US nor BRICS countries adopt #Bitcoin, and the current reserve asset landscape remains unchanged
The UST remains the global reserve asset (for now), and the USD remains the global reserve currency.
US benefits from #Bitcoin price appreciation and diversification of its reserves. The USD remains global reserve currency
BRIICSS+ ultimately fails.
4. US maintains status quo, BRIICSS+ adopt Bitcoin:
Demand for #Bitcoin increases, leading to price appreciation and decreased volatility
This results in a weakened USD + reduced demand for USTs—especially as more and larger energy purchases are settled in #Bitcoin
(cont'd)
The USD risks losing its dominance as the global reserve currency
The ultimate (and most dangerous for US) outcome of this scenario is hyperbitcoinization, or #Bitcoin rapidly replacing all fiat currencies as the primary medium of exchange, unit of account, and store of value.
Game Theory
So, from the US perspective, the danger of not adopting #Bitcoin is most evident in scenario 4
This is the only scenario where the USD is most at risk of being toppled as global reserve currency and hyperbitcoinization occurs.
Do I think this will happen?
I do believe it is an eventuality. But I also believe this is a long way off. I mean decades and decades...
Do I think the expansion of BRICS and that cooperative expanding will cause this eventuality?
Will BRICS be the so-called trigger?
Put simply, no.
I believe the countries that make up BRICS are too unstable themselves individually to form a strong enough partnership with enough trust to threaten the US hegemony
At least for the foreseeable future.
And I believe the US government and officials believe the very same
They are not worried about BRICS toppling the UST, and they are not concerned with hyperbitcoinization...
Yet.
And so, I maintain that the most likely scenario (which is also far off in the future) is that #Bitcoin becomes the ultimate global store of value and the USD remains the global medium of exchange
BTFP. The new Fed and Treasury bank liquidity program.
There's tons of confusion about BTFP and whether it’s just another form of QE or even outright money printing.
Let's clear that up, shall we?
Time for a Fed 🧵👇
🧐 What is BTFP?
First, what the heck is BTFP, how does it work?
A brainchild of the Treasury and Fed last month, BTFP stands for *Bank Term Funding Program*
Its purpose is to provide liquidity to banks who may become underfunded due to large and sudden customer withdrawals.
I say ‘underfunded’, but really, these banks are demonstrating a monumental level of ignorance and/or arrogance
If you're wondering what I mean, or want to refresh on the whole SVB meltdown, I wrote all about it a few weeks ago, you can find that here: jameslavish.substack.com/p/svb-the-fdic…
Another Fed Meeting, another decision based on flawed metrics. One of them is the new CPI. Or shall I say the *New New CPI*?
Because the calculation has been sneakily adjusted again recently, and yes, it matters. Why and how?
Time for an inflation 🧵👇
🧐 Current CPI
First, for those who are new to the whole Fed Shell Game, or if you need a little refresher, a quick review of CPI:
The Consumer Price Index, also known as CPI, is the benchmark for U.S. inflation as calculated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (the BLS).
You may have noticed recent controversy about the accuracy of the CPI and whether the BLS is understating inflation
People ask every time a new CPI reading is released: how can the prices of groceries, cars, houses, be so inflated, yet the CPI rises only a fraction of that?
With the 'sudden' onset of bank insolvency and credit risk, it seems a good time to peek at the US Treasury’s *own* financial position.
Take its debt temperature, so to speak. This is a long but really important one, so saddle up and settle in.
It's time for debt 🧵👇
🥸 What’s the CBO report?
First off, CBO stands for Congressional Budget Office, the federal agency that semi-regularly provides budget information and economic forecasts to Congress
And the CBO recently published its federal budget projections for the next 10 years.
A few key points from the report summarizes what the CBO expects:
• GDP is projected to stop growing early this year and start growing again by second half of 2023
• The CBO expects inflation to remain above 2% through 2024 and return to 2% by 2026
As you may have heard recently, Credit Suisse is in trouble. Deep Trouble.
Question is, can they—*will they*—seize customer deposits to pay off creditors in a bankruptcy restructuring?
Time for a Bankruptcy 🧵👇
🤑 Bail-outs
If you’re in your 20’s or older, you likely remember the Great Financial Crisis
You know, that event in 2008 to 2010 that pushed major banks to the edge of catastrophic-level collapse because of poor—or non-existent—risk management policies?
As consequence for their gross negligence, most of these banks received the due punishment they deserved
The companies went bankrupt. The managers lost their bonuses, many were fired and many arrested, and they were all left to deal with a life of shame and poverty 🤡