Joe Biden is the criminal
George Bush is a criminal
Barack Obama is a criminal
The entire west is up against Russia with proxy war funding, with military equipment, with sanctions.
Yet Russia seems to be winning.
NOBODY IS PUSHING THE WAR MORE THAN “VICTORIA NULAND” #VictoriaNuland
The United States is indisputable leader in defense spending both in absolute figures and per capita.
However, on the latter count the gap is not so dramatic with some Nordic countries demonstrating impressive propensity for making their citizens pay for war.
Who wouldn’t love USA when they can make $130 billion off of a proxy war
American warmongers bombing Yugoslavia in 1999 killing more than 2000 and displacing 1000s of people
There has never been a war in history where 80% of the country has been destroyed, 100% of the population displaced, and 50% of the deaths are children.
NO COUNTRY CAN MATCH THE MILITARY MIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES 🇺🇸
The B-2 bomber just flew into Iran, struck 3 nuclear sites & returned — without even being detected. With 44 hours of continuous flight, 18,000+ km range, and a $2.1 billion price tag
The notion that repeating a lie often enough can make it seem like truth is a psychological tactic rooted in the "illusion of truth" effect. When people hear a statement repeatedly, their familiarity with it increases, and they are more likely to perceive it as credible, even if it lacks evidence. This is why propaganda often relies on relentless repetition through media, speeches, or social channels to entrench ideas in the public psyche. Historically, this technique has been used to manipulate narratives, from wartime propaganda to modern misinformation campaigns. Conspiracy theories, often dismissed as fringe, can gain traction this way, especially when repeated across platforms like X or through influential voices. When some theories are later validated, it fuels distrust in institutions, as people feel vindicated in their skepticism.
One striking example is the MKUltra program, a CIA operation that began as a conspiracy theory in the 1970s. Rumors circulated that the U.S. government was conducting mind-control experiments on unwitting citizens, which were dismissed as paranoid delusions. However, declassified documents in 1975 revealed that MKUltra was real: the CIA had conducted illegal experiments using drugs like LSD and psychological torture on hundreds of subjects, often without consent. The revelation, uncovered through the Church Committee hearings, confirmed what was once ridiculed, showing how government secrecy can lend credence to conspiracy theories when the truth emerges. This case illustrates how repeated whispers of a "lie" can turn out to reflect a hidden reality, especially when authorities deny it initially.
Another example is the Tuskegee syphilis experiment, which fueled conspiracy theories about medical misconduct. For decades, African American communities speculated about unethical government experiments, often dismissed as baseless fears. Yet, in 1972, it was revealed that the U.S. Public Health Service had deliberately withheld treatment from Black men with syphilis for 40 years to study the disease’s progression, even after penicillin became available. The exposure of this atrocity validated long-standing distrust in medical institutions, particularly among marginalized groups. These cases show how the repetition of a "lie" can plant seeds of truth, especially when systemic cover-ups unravel, reinforcing the power of persistent narratives to shape perceptions and, sometimes, uncover reality.
The failure to name, defame, indict, or arrest the clients of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Sean "Diddy" Combs, despite their own high-profile arrests, points to a troubling pattern of selective accountability that protects the powerful. This seems to run across party lines, not specific to Democrat or Republican. These individuals operated within elite circles, allegedly facilitating or engaging in egregious acts of exploitation and trafficking, yet the focus remains narrowly on them as individuals rather than the broader networks they served. The clients—often wealthy, influential figures in politics, business, or entertainment—appear shielded by a system that prioritizes discretion over justice. This suggests a deliberate effort to limit exposure, perhaps to avoid destabilizing institutions or reputations tied to these networks. The lack of transparency fuels suspicion that those in power are complicit in preserving a status quo where the elite evade scrutiny, leaving only the orchestrators to face consequences while their patrons remain untouched.
This disparity in accountability undermines public trust in the justice system and perpetuates a culture of impunity for the privileged. If Epstein, Maxwell, and Combs were indeed central to criminal enterprises, their clients were not mere bystanders but active participants who enabled and benefited from these schemes. The absence of indictments or even public naming of these individuals raises questions about whether investigations are intentionally curtailed to protect those with the means to influence outcomes. Systemic barriers, such as sealed records, private settlements, or prosecutorial reluctance to challenge powerful figures, may be at play, ensuring that the client lists remain shrouded in secrecy. By failing to pursue these clients, authorities risk signaling that justice is a privilege reserved for the few, leaving victims without full reckoning and society grappling with the unsettling reality that some are above the law.
A thread on Epstein, Maxwell, Diddy and their criminal elite sex trafficking networks👇
The National Institutes of Health has shut down research labs accused of conducting deadly experiments on thousands of beagles over the past 40+ years.
EACH AND EVERY TIME GOVERNMENT TRIES TO SOLVE A PROBLEM, THEY END UP CREATING MORE
Chaos: Governments, in their attempt to impose order, often create chaos by disrupting established systems. For example, a sudden policy to nationalize industries can lead to mismanagement, supply chain breakdowns, and public unrest as businesses struggle to adapt.
Assault: Governments may use force to enforce laws, sometimes escalating to violence against citizens. For instance, during protests, police deployed by the state might use tear gas or batons, injuring peaceful demonstrators.
Theft: Through taxation or seizure, governments can take property without consent, resembling theft. An example is eminent domain, where a person's home is taken for public projects, often with inadequate compensation.
Extortion: Governments can pressure individuals or businesses for money or compliance under threat of punishment. For example, a small business might face hefty fines or closure unless it pays inflated licensing fees demanded by local officials.
Intimidation: State authorities may intimidate citizens to suppress dissent or enforce compliance. A citizen criticizing government policy online might receive threatening visits from law enforcement, discouraging free speech.
Collusion: Governments can collude with private entities to prioritize elite interests over the public. For instance, a government might award contracts to a favored corporation in exchange for political donations, sidelining fair competition.
Discrimination: Policies may unfairly target or exclude certain groups, fostering inequality. An example is a law banning specific religious practices, disproportionately harming minority communities while favoring others.
Trauma: Government actions, like forced displacements or aggressive policing, can inflict emotional and physical trauma. For example, children separated from parents during immigration enforcement may suffer long-term psychological harm.
Tyranny: Overreaching authority can lead to oppressive rule, stifling freedoms. A government imposing strict curfews and censoring media to control a crisis can erode personal liberties, resembling tyrannical rule.
Death: In extreme cases, government actions result in loss of life. For instance, a poorly planned military operation to address insurgency might lead to civilian casualties due to collateral damage.