1. A thread on taking back control of borders.

(Or not).

Unpacking the confusion.
2. The UK government claims to want to take back control of borders.

But did they mean control of settlement immigration? Or actual control of border crossings?

Do they even know what they want to control?
3. In reality, as a non-Schengen country, and as an island, the UK has always had full control of its border crossing points. UK is surrounded by water which helps. The only exception perhaps is the open Irish border but that’s down to the Good Friday Agreement not EU membership.
4. Of course UK has also had the ability to exercise control over settlement immigration. The EU FOM rules (that UK chose not to bother implementing) would have given them all the control they actually needed to manage permanent immigration from EU countries.
5. To see whether UK is limiting immigration more or less now than before Brexit you need to examine the criteria for access in the new points scheme. It appears the government can vary those criteria at will as suits them (not necessarily suits you) from time to time.
5. Brits settling in Spain or other EU countries etc (wanting to stay over 90 days) have always had to evidence a job/cash/healthcare even when EU members. (In recent years, UK also mandated healthcare but never actually asked immigrants to evidence it)
6. UK gov ministers love to confuse you by talking about border checks one minute and control of immigration the next.
7. But since Brexit almost nothing changed at the border.

Before Brexit EU citizens could stay as a visitor in the UK for up to 90 days (in practice 6 months actually).

After Brexit, it’s exactly the same!
8. But what about overstay?

Ever noticed how the UK doesn’t have outbound passport control?

How do they track people down who overstay?

Good question.
9. So Brexit has changed almost nothing about how the physical border to the UK is controlled. EU visitors are still welcome for up to 6 months per visit.
10. Technically multiple visits of 6 months in a year may lead to refusal, but with no stamping and no outbound passport control process how could this ever get controlled or punished?
11. So because of the rather more relaxed way that UK manages the border than EU countries, it’s rather looks like Brexit had changed nothing for EU visitors to the UK, yet for Brits queuing at the Schengen covering 27 separate countries it’s a very different experience.
12. At the moment every just accepts this is because of Brexit.

But we need to start asking questions of politicians about this bizarre “theatre” at our borders.

How does it improve safety and security for the people of the UK or Europe? Or is it merely performative.
13. Does it stop terrorists? Probably not. Does it stop people overstaying? Not really.
14. Does it cause big queues? For sure, yes.

Is it a huge inconvenience for frequent travellers? Definitely.
15. So what should be done?

Should the Schengen border be different for UK passport holders (and EU travellers in the reverse direction)?
16. To answer that you need to look at geography, economics, passenger numbers and immigration risk.
17. Do Brits present an increased immigration risk since Brexit?

Probably not.

What changed on 31 Dec 2020?

Is it harder for EU countries to track & deport Brits who shouldn’t be there? Maybe. But in practice UK and EU27 would likely cooperate.
18. And is it more expensive to find and track down EU citizens in the UK who shouldn’t be there? Probably, yes, but again, in practice, is the UK even bothering? Beyond a few dawn raids for show?
19. Soon ETIAS will come in and the UK equivalent. All that will mean is that innocent travellers will be paying £6 or €7 to have their personal details stored in a computer.

Will it reduce terrorism? Who knows?

Will it make us safer? I doubt it.
20. UK and EU have a unique window of opportunity to spare each other’s citizens all this border pain.

They just need to talk.

I’d like to see Sunak having honest and sensible conversations with Europe on this.
21. It’s ironic that the UK was a proponent of EES (the new border control computer of the Schengen zone) back in 2014. But in those days Brexit wasn’t on the cards.

So why? Did UK ministers plan to join Schengen one day?

We will probably never know.
22. Travel is good for cultural understanding. Mobility matters for British people as much as it does Europeans.

Border friction is bad for everyone.
23. Letting people decide where they live (separate to deciding where they work) avoids abusive employment situations where people’s right to live in a country is tied to their job.
24. I think it’s time we put Brexit to one side and asked what kind of border controls (and immigration controls) we actually want or even need for Brits and Europeans.

The current mess is surely neither desirable nor sustainable.

#SaveFOM

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Hesselden 🇪🇺🇬🇧🇪🇸🇨🇭🇩🇪🇫🇷🇮🇹🇵🇹

Andrew Hesselden 🇪🇺🇬🇧🇪🇸🇨🇭🇩🇪🇫🇷🇮🇹🇵🇹 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @andrewhesselden

May 1
1. Freedom of Movement of People isn’t “uncontrolled immigration” despite what some politicians want you to believe.

This thread explains some of the benefits of it.
2. It’s superior to visas because:
- it’s quick (shorter queues)
- on demand (not months of waiting)
- reciprocal (not one-way immigration to the UK)
- not tied to a particular job
- cheap (no wasteful fees)
- conditions in event you want to stay more than 90 days
3. It’s superior to visa-waivers because you get:
- treated as national
- more certainty at borders (no reliance on whim of border guard so long as you have valid ID that’s valid and don’t present a threat.
- no day counting (although UK has no outbound checks)
- faster borders
Read 11 tweets
Apr 29
1. The reason I champion the rights of per year dwellers, itinerant workers, seasonal workers and even general travellers is that Freedom of Movement was so much more than IMMIGRATION. Mobility is about staying where you are and temporarily being somewhere else.
2. I think the idea of MOBILITY has been lost and misunderstood. Thrown away in haste in a futile and misguided attempt to limit or control permanent immigration.
3. The biggest champions of FOM in the UK tended to be people who had used it once to emigrate permanently. For them it avoided a one-time visa.
Read 10 tweets
Apr 29
1. The online abuse I’ve received in recent years has been quite phenomenal. It’s easy to block some of it out but it does get a bit wearing after a while. Nevertheless I want to help correct some of the deliberate disinformation perpetuated about Freedom of Movement and Europe.
2. Freedom of Movement of people isn’t the same as “uncontrolled immigration”. It matters to people all over Europe and it gives them freedom from abusive employment where visas are conditional on jobs.
3. Freedom of Movement ended purely because of UK government choices. Not because Brits voted for that. Not because UK left the EU and not even because UK left the EEA.
Read 14 tweets
Apr 19
THREAD 1. I'm constantly frustrated by the inability of politicians across Europe (especially in the UK) to agree and broker an adequate outcome to Brexit for the Citizens of Europe (including British people) #SaveFOM
2. Brexit never needed to mean loss of Freedom of Movement of People (FOM). The border control craved by UK gov and the Rest-of-World immigration limits wanted by a few Leave voters, are unrelated to the mobility that European FOM gave us. Visas don't replace it adequately.
3. I'd love to reverse Brexit, but too many people tell me that's either not possible, or not achievable quickly. And so I don't think we should wait for Brexit to be reversed before demanding improvements to people mobility for all. (Especially those "mobile" before Brexit.)
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(