Post

@eu_echo

@ochaopt

@elicoh1

@elicoh1

@UN

More from @EpshtainItay

Itay Epshtain

@EpshtainItay

Aug 6

#Israel is set to expand its #Gaza offensive, in what amounts to 'Debellatio.' A short thread on the supreme international crime:
1/3 war of debilitation is characterized by the unlawful intent and attempt to bring the complete destruction and disintegration of all public life and institutions.

2/3 Debellatio was a legal construct during a period when States were free to wage war for territorial gain. However, in contemporary international law, that would be an act of aggression.

3/3 The concept of 'debellatio,' including the complete and total defeat of an adversary, and the taking of "spoils of war" (the territory and sovereignty of the vanquished belligerent) has been outlawed. Time we call #Israel's war in #Gaza what it is - a crime of #aggression.

Read 4 tweets

Itay Epshtain

@EpshtainItay

Jul 13

BREAKING: Former #Israel Minister of Intelligence @GilaGamliel (@Likud_Party, the current Minister of Science) fabricates the October 2023 plan for mass deportation of #Palestinians from #Gaza, in a purported attempt to avoid complicity in the war crime of unlawful deportation and transfer. A thread:

1/3 On 13 October 2023, the Ministry of Intelligence circulated a white paper, calling for the forcible transfer of the civilian population to Rafah, leading to mass deportation to tent cities in northern Sinai, their eventual resettlement there, and the fortification of the Gaza-Egypt frontier, so they may not return.

2/3 Last week, Minister Gamlil recirculated a fabricated version of her criminal plan. While it bears the same date (13 October 2023), it was doctored to refer to "voluntary humanitarian evacuation" to Sinai, and references to forced resettlement and non-repartation were omitted.

Read 4 tweets

Itay Epshtain

@EpshtainItay

Jul 9

1/5 The Assembly of States Parties to the @IntlCrimCourt concludes its special session on the crime of aggression today. Over the past three days, it has considered amendments to the exercise of the Court’s jurisdiction over the crime of aggression. The #US, not a State party, was present, on the behest of #Israel, in order to intimidate and coerce others from pursuing criminal justice for the supreme international crime.

2/5 The proposed amendment, under debate, seeks to ensure that all States Parties are equally subject to the Court’s jurisdiction over aggression, allowing the Court to exercise its jurisdiction over the crime of aggression even when committed by nationals of a State that is not a party to the Statute or when committed on its territory and established a jurisdictional framework that applies uniformly to all core crime.

3/4 US State Department Legal Advisor Reed Rubinstein – who vowed during his March 2025 nomination hearing to serve “national interests above all else” – intervened and threatened the Court and the State parties with “diplomatic, political, and legal instruments to block @IntlCrimCourt overreach.” Coercion was clear: the #US expects “all ICC actions against the United States and our ally #Israel-that is, all investigations and all arrest warrants-to be terminated. If not, all options remain on the table.”

Read 6 tweets

Itay Epshtain

@EpshtainItay

Jul 8

The parallels are uncanny...

Together with a copy of the @DonaldTrump nomination letter handed over by @netanyahu is a petition from his party, @Likud_Party, to seek endorsement of the October 23' Ministry of Intelligence plan (at the time, headed by Gila Gamliel) for mass deportation from #Gaza.

The criminal endeavour, now referred to as the 'Gamliel-Trump Plan,' outlines the four stages: 1. A call on #Palestinian civilians to vacate north #Gaza and allow for land operations; 2. Sequential land operations from north to south, Gaza; 3. Leaving routes open across Rafah; 4. Establishing "tent cities" in northern Sinai and the construction of cities to resettle Palestinians in #Egypt.

Read 5 tweets

Itay Epshtain

@EpshtainItay

Jun 3

First, there was the #Gaza pier, which floated away before delivering any meaningful aid, then there were the airdrops, which landed in the Mediterranean, when they didn't kill or injure Palestinians. Now, there are the sham humanitarians - brandishing assault rifles - of the "Gaza Humanitarian Foundation" setting up death traps for Gazans starved by #Israel.

It is all an attempt to obfuscate the intentional use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare and territorial conquest. A distraction from the grave breaches and serious violations of interntional law. A ruse leading to the death of thousands.

The answer has always been clear. Israel must adhere to its duty, as the occupying power, to facilitate independent and impartial humanitarian relief, free from any military, political, or economic interference, offered by impartial humanitarian organizations, across the
occupied Palestinian territory, including Gaza. Lifting the near-total siege and blockade on Gaza, and taking action to prevent further forcible transfer and starvation, is the absolute minimum. What we see now is diametrically opposed, and criminal.

Read 9 tweets

Itay Epshtain

@EpshtainItay

May 21

The @EUCouncil's 'qualified majority' decision to review #Israel's adherence to Article 2 of the Association Agreement raises an unresolved EU procedural law matter. A thread for those interested in the more technical aspects (which could have major legal and political implications):

1/3 Article 218 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU, the founding treaty of the EU, signed in 1957 and revised in 2007) regulates agreements between the Union and third countries, such as Israel. There are three stages to it:
- The @EUCouncil authorises the opening of negotiations and adopts negotiating directives
- The @EU_Commission and the @eu_eeas HR/VP submit recommendations to the Council
- After consulting the European Parliament @Europarl_EN, the Council must reach unanimity of member states to adopt a decision concluding the association agreement

2/3 Article 218(9) then provides that on recommendation from the HR/VP @kajakallas - pending said review - the Council may decide, again, unanimously, to suspend the EU-Israel Association Agreement. Therein lies the problem. The review will likely confirm that #Israel's actions in occupied #Palestinian territory amount to a grave breach of peremptory norms of international law (jus cogens), including, inter alia, the prohibition of aggression, the prohibition of genocide, the prohibition of crimes against humanity, the basic rules of international humanitarian law (and corollary war crimes), and the suppression of the right to self-determination.

Read 5 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Itay Epshtain

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @EpshtainItay

Itay Epshtain

Itay Epshtain

Itay Epshtain

Itay Epshtain

Itay Epshtain

Itay Epshtain

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!