#SupremeCourt to hear today Women Wrestlers' plea alleging sexual harrasment by BJP MP and Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) President Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh.
SG Mehta: Your lordships had passed an order for security on the last occasion. Sum and substance is para 4-
"Proper security has been provided to Minor in Rohtak..."
SG Mehta: Threat assessment for others was carried out. As per the assessment there was no threat. However it was found reasonable to provide security to them. Security is provided to all 6. 3 armed police officers have been deployed at Jantar Mantar.
SG: The chronology - whose statements to be recorded etc, your lordships can leave to the investigative agency. We're doing our best, neutrally. We're impartial.
SG Mehta: It is being done well, it is done by a very senior lady officer and her team. Everytime coming to this court with petitions saying do this first and then this- may not be right.
Counsel: Then we came to this court. They said we'll register FIR. Next day the minor was interrogated for 3 hours. No formal 160 notice was given to her. 5 police constables came.
SG Mehta: Interrogation is the wrong word, it was a discussion. Venue was his office.
Counsel: Then there was radio silence on part of police. Then yesterday they come up with 6 160 notices for recording. No notice, no complaint despite FIR being registered. Yesterday till late evening, they're recording statements of 4 girls.
Counsel: So far as accused is concerned, he has become a TV star. Everyday he is giving interviews in TV channels. He is taking names of the complainants, he is naming their Akhadas.
SG Mehta: Two political leaders of parties - i may not name them- went with a truck full of beds, that was prevented to enter the protest. The media says he was drunk. Medical report was seen. He wasn't drunk. Police was also hurt.
CJI DY Chandrachud: The petition has been instituted by three petitioners, all of whom have stated that they have represented India in reputed international wrestling events.
CJI DY Chandrachud: This court was apprised by the SG that since the allegations implicate commissioner for cognizable offence, the police had decided to register an FIR.
CJI DY Chandrachud: The statement of minor complainant under S 161 was recorded in two sessions between 4 pm and 5.45 pm and between 8.20 pm and 9.43 pm in presence of 4 women constables in the office of counsel of petitioners.
@AimanChishti There is no indication on the case diary that the FIR is politically motivated and based on some false and concocted story. The nature of offences disclosed in the FIR are crime against the society being basically pertaining to outraging of the modesty of woman: High Court
@AimanChishti With regard to the plea of delay, the contents of the FIR show that the unbecoming behaviour on the part of the petitioner towards the victim was complained to the high office bearers of the political party, but despite waiting for some days, the same yielded no response: Court
The Court in its Order dated May 2, 2023, had stated that when the teaser of the film was released as early as 03.11.2022, the petitioner should have moved the court earlier and not right before its release date on 05.05.2023. #KeralaHC #TheKeralaStory
#SupremeCourt hears Centre's application seeking recall of Ritu Chhabaria v UOI.
In Chhabaria, SC held that an incomplete chargesheet filed by investigating agency without completing investigation will not defeat the right of the accused for default bail.
Earlier, the Court had ordered that any application filed before any court seeking default bail on the basis of Chhabaria judgment should be deferred to a date after May 4.
#SupremeCourt to hear PIL involving interpretation of Section 29A of the Representation of People’s Act, 1951 as to whether the ECI is empowered to derecognise political parties formed by convicted persons
Adv Ashwini Upadhyay (petitioner): This is a case under RP Act. There is a vacuum. Presently, a person who is declared unfit, can form a political party and decide who is fight election.
#MadrasHC to hear shortly a plea seeking to ban #TheKeralaStory movie. Bench of Justice AD Jagadish Chandira and Justice C Saravanan to hear the plea by journalist BR Aravindakshan twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
J. Chandira - is the movie in tamil, hindi or malayalam
Adv- It's a multilingual movie you honour. It's made in Hindi, Malayalam, Tamil and Telulu #TheKeralaStory
J Chandira- Is it a documentary movie or commercial movie? Is it based on facts?
Adv- They have Commercialised the facts. They claim that the movie is based on real events happening in Kerala.
J. Chandira - What happened in Kerala HC.
Aag Ravindran- It's been posted tomorrow… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…