Sr. Adv. Dave: I request your Lordships to allow screening of trailer. The impact of film today is much greater on minds of people today than books can ever be. This may create serious public law and order problem. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Sr. Adv. Dave: Kerala is God's own country. Everyone loves coming to Kerala. The whole community is being demonized. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Bench: What is there in the trailer that demonises the entire community?
Sr. Adv. Dave: I urge Your Lordships to see the Trailer. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Sr. Adv. Dave refers to the SC order in the Sudharshan TV case, where the Muslim community was vilified. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Sr. Adv. Dave now takes the Court through Sections 4 and 5 of the Cinematograph Act.
Dave: If you're going to defeat whole society..
Bench: Is there any allegation in the cinema?
Dave: Para 10 and 11 exactly says what the trailer says #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Justice Nagaresh: There is nothing against an entire society in the film. A statutory authority has already seen this and suggested cuts. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Dave: It is against the sovereignty and integrity of India.
Justice Nagaresh: Why do you say so?
Dave: This country is founded on principle of secularism. Dr. Ambedkar said that liberty and equality is nothing without fraternity... #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Sr. Adv. Dave: Fraternity is something I urge your Lordships to keep in mind while examining. Fraternity in society is very important, it is part of the basic structure.
Justice Nagaresh: But this is not based on historical facts, it is a story. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Sr. Adv. Dave: This is not a film based on facts. It is a clear case of 153A.
Justice Nagaresh: This is not history. It is fiction counsel. In Kerala we are so secular. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Justice Nagaresh: There was a movie where a pujari spit on an ideal and no problem was there. Can you imagine? It is a famous award winning movie.
Dave: I have not seen that movie. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Sr. Adv. Dave: Kerala is not like other states. I have love coming there. It is a beautiful society. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Justice Nagaresh: There are umpteen movies in which Hindu sanyasis are seen as smugglers. Nothing happens. No one says anything. You may have seen such movies in Hindi and Malayalam. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Sr. Adv. Dave: Your Lordships are right. But just because one wrong was permitted, doesn't mean another also has to be. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Sr. Adv. Dave now takes the Court through Firoz Khan v. Union of India (Sudharshan TV Case) #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Sr. Adv. Dave: Please look at Para 11. Each statement in the trailer is false. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Sr. Adv. Dave: Please see what is the purpose of the fiction. Purpose of fiction is to portray Muslim community as villains. Isolated incidents cannot be made to seem like the truth and made into a movie. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Sr. Adv. Dave: the SC in Feroz Khan says an insidious attempt has been made to insinuate that the community is trying to infiltrate the civil services. To bring the community in hatred and disrepute.
Justice Nagaresh: Mr. Dave, was this a movie? If it is fictional movie, it is a different thing.
Sr. Adv. Dave: Your Lordship, I am on legal principles, not the facts. It was a serial, a show, based on a fake narrative. #KeralaHC#TheKeralStory
Sr. Adv. Dave: If the Censor board ignores it duty, then this court has the power to interfere. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Dave: Let us assume one or two incidents take place. You cannot glorify them. Let law take its course.
Bench: Are filmmakers trying to glorify or condemn? #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Sr. Adv. Dave: There is serious thought on impact. I am also a strong advocate of freedom, but if the freedom is likely to poison minds of innocent people and threaten public order, such freedom must be curtailed. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Sr. Adv. Dave: I request your Lordship to see the film, satisfy your lordships conscience. I respectfully beseech your Lordships to intervene and stop the telecast. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Sr. Adv. George Poonthottam is now making his submissions.
Bench: What is your prayer?
Poonthottam: My prayer is to recall the certificate #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Poonthottam: Either your Lorship see first...
Bench: None of us have seen the movie. Now the issue is whether contents of trailer... #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Bench asks if trailer and teaser are different. Counsels affirm that it is. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Poonthottam: They dont say it is fiction. They say it is based on true events
Bench: They only say they are inspired by true events
Poonthottam: No no #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Bench: Ours is democracy with secularism embedded in it.
Poonthottam: Originally they started saying it was 32000. Then they reduced it to 3. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Bench: This is not the first time where a movie sets something in a bad light. Why this movie alone? #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Justice Nagaresh: You can say my God is the only God. My God is the true God. Constitution permits it. But if you say it to person belonging to another religion, is it not offensive? But Constitution still protects it. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Bench: It says here about Allah. What is wrong in it?
Poothottam: It is not like that, It is a most vulgar form of propagation #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Court assures the counsel that it shall watch the teaser and trailer of the movie.
The Court is now watching the teaser of the film. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Justice Nagaresh: Now tell me counsel, what is against Islam? There is no allegation against a religion, but only against the organization ISIS.
Poonthottam: The theme projected is Kerala is centre of all terrorist activity #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Justice Nagaresh: This has been there in Malayalam movies for many years, so why should it be a basis?
Even Christian preachers have been shown in that light. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Justice Nagaresh: What is there to show.. why are you saying clerics are shown in bad light? Where is it shown they are clerics? Some man is coming in cap and saying you should impregnate. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Bench: This is fiction. There are no ghosts or vampires, but there are a large number of movies showing the same. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
The Counsel shows a poster of the movie which states that the film is based on true story. #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Adv. Shah: You know within community we are attacking spiritual leaders, nothing will happen. But they are attacking gods of another religion.
Counsel reads a scene from the trailer which shows the same.
Bench: What is wrong in it? #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Adv. Shah: It is being said your God isn't good God, my God is the good God. Now we come to 153A.
Justice Nagaresh: If Constitution permits propagation, what is wrong in it? #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Shah: This trailer was published on 26th. I filed the complaint on 30th. I filed complaint before Central government and the authority.
Counsel now takes the Court through the Rules.
Shah: If I attack another religion, then there will be disharmony.
Justice Nagaresh: Where in the teaser or trailer is it being shown? #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Justice Nagaresh: One religion says my God is the only God, the true God. If that is permitted...
Shah: Can I say your Lord is not a good God? I can say my God is good, but I cannot say your God is bad #KeralaHC#TheKeralaStory
Justice Nagaresh: But if someone says my God is the only God, wouldn't all others be bad?
Shah: Parents will think I cannot send my children to hostel in which Muslim students also stay, they will get converted. That is the impression that they are creating here.
Shah: Here they say that only the Hindu and Christian girls are being targeted and their parents should be careful. When they say it is a true story, what will be the mindset of the parents? They say after 20 years, Kerala will be Islamic State.
Adv. Kaleeswaram Raj seeks to make a brief submission
Bench: No, Mr. Raj you have already made your submission. It is already 12:05
Adv. Raj: I won't be repeating anything already highlighted, only a brief submission.
Raj: Second submission is that teaser Your Lordships were pleased to watch. R3 (CBFC) has filed a counter affidavit in this writ petition. Para 7 in that may be seen.
Raj: First of all, there must be some action on the teaser. Another submission is if this is the teaser and trailer, no one has as of now see the film. Apart from it, I would submit that the content of the film cannot be kept in mystery.
Sr Adv Ravi Kadam: We have put a disclaimer and stated that it is a work of fiction. It is 'inspired' by true events. In a film, things are always dramatized. Otherwise no one will watch it.
Kadam: Trailer doesn't need separate certification as part of law if film is certified. Teaser, yes. Teaser is not part of film, it is only for social media. Reliefs are sought in relation to film and excerpts of it.
Justice Nagaresh: It only says 'inspired by true events'. There is something called freedom of speech and expression. They have artistic freedom, we have to balance that also.
Kadam: SC struck down prohibitions by State Governments saying all requirements are in guidelines. Moment certificate is issued by Statutory Authority, there is a presumption in favour of that certificate
Kadam: Day after day, someone will be happy, someone will be unhappy. But there is a process. It cannot be ignored. How can they file the applications without seeing the film?
Kadam: That was on the basis of an information we received. That was in the teaser. That will not be continued. Please record my submission. We will remove it from social media
Order: All these petitions seek to suspend teaser and trailer of the movie Kerala Story and prohibit exhibition of the movie. Allegation is that movie is based on incorrect, unverified facts and contain derogatory remarks.
Order: Going through the trailer of the movie, we find it does not contain anything offensive to any particular community as a whole. Fact remains that none of petitioners have watched movie as a whole
Order: From the statement of the DSG, the producers have published a disclaimer that the film is fictionalized. We are not inclined to pass an interim order restraining exhibition of film.
Order: In view of above, and taking into consideration the statement made by the producer/company that producer does not intend to retain the offending teaser in the social media handles, no further orders are required at this stage.
@AimanChishti There is no indication on the case diary that the FIR is politically motivated and based on some false and concocted story. The nature of offences disclosed in the FIR are crime against the society being basically pertaining to outraging of the modesty of woman: High Court
@AimanChishti With regard to the plea of delay, the contents of the FIR show that the unbecoming behaviour on the part of the petitioner towards the victim was complained to the high office bearers of the political party, but despite waiting for some days, the same yielded no response: Court
The Court in its Order dated May 2, 2023, had stated that when the teaser of the film was released as early as 03.11.2022, the petitioner should have moved the court earlier and not right before its release date on 05.05.2023. #KeralaHC #TheKeralaStory
#SupremeCourt hears Centre's application seeking recall of Ritu Chhabaria v UOI.
In Chhabaria, SC held that an incomplete chargesheet filed by investigating agency without completing investigation will not defeat the right of the accused for default bail.
Earlier, the Court had ordered that any application filed before any court seeking default bail on the basis of Chhabaria judgment should be deferred to a date after May 4.
#SupremeCourt to hear PIL involving interpretation of Section 29A of the Representation of People’s Act, 1951 as to whether the ECI is empowered to derecognise political parties formed by convicted persons
Adv Ashwini Upadhyay (petitioner): This is a case under RP Act. There is a vacuum. Presently, a person who is declared unfit, can form a political party and decide who is fight election.
#MadrasHC to hear shortly a plea seeking to ban #TheKeralaStory movie. Bench of Justice AD Jagadish Chandira and Justice C Saravanan to hear the plea by journalist BR Aravindakshan twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
J. Chandira - is the movie in tamil, hindi or malayalam
Adv- It's a multilingual movie you honour. It's made in Hindi, Malayalam, Tamil and Telulu #TheKeralaStory
J Chandira- Is it a documentary movie or commercial movie? Is it based on facts?
Adv- They have Commercialised the facts. They claim that the movie is based on real events happening in Kerala.
J. Chandira - What happened in Kerala HC.
Aag Ravindran- It's been posted tomorrow… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Counsel: Your lordships had said that we can approach the HC to look into urgency of matter and constitute a bench. Bench was constituted by they said they could only take up tomorrow.
Counsel: We went to Chief Justice of Kerala HC and asked him to assign bench today. He expressed the inability. The realease is tomorrow. Penny drops tomorrow. I'm requesting hearing today.