Mick Ryan, AM Profile picture
May 8 12 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
This is a very good thread on Russian obstacle zone development in #Ukraine, from @Inkvisiit, for a number of reasons. 1/12
2/ First this is a very extensively fortified region with multiple defensive zones in depth. It is impossible to create such a complex for the entire length of the front line being defended by the Russians.
3/ The assessment therefore is that defensive complexes such as this give us insights into what the Russians view as the key terrain in the coming Ukrainian offensives.
4/ Second, following on from this, it also provides insights into the Russian’s appreciation of the ‘most dangerous’ and ‘most likely’ courses of action for the Ukrainians in their offensives.
5/ Given the massive resources required to site and build obstacles, as well as lay mines and then cover them with observation and fire, the Russians would have done a detailed assessment of the theatre and prioritized key areas where they thought the Ukrainians would attack.
6/ This is obviously one of those areas. And it should be noted, the vast majority of obstacles are not about stopping an enemy. They are more about channeling them into ‘killing zones’, or breaking up their cohesion and their combined arms teams.
7/ Obstacles zones like this are also about slowing down such attacks, particularly in the event of surprise, to allow time for counter attack and counter penetration forces to deploy at the tactical and operational levels.
8/ As part of such an obstacle complex, the Russians will also have an ISR plan to seek out Ukrainian capabilities that are conducting recon of the obstacles. At least in competent Russian units, they will be engaging in a recon battle to deny close recon of these zones.
9/ And they will be looking for Ukrainian engineer equipment that has been pre-positioned for assaults. This will help the Russians confirm their appreciation of Ukraine’s objectives. The Ukrainians will be undertaking deception ops to prevent the Russians collecting this info.
10/ None of this is sensitive or secret info. It is basic doctrine that all professional armies train to. The Russians have similar doctrine. It is prudent that we assume they understand these basic principles. The Ukrainians will.
11/ But in reality, having good doctrine and being able to implement it are two different things. We will see very soon how it all plays out.
12/ Of course, tactical obstacles can have operational and strategic impacts if they are sited well, are appropriately covered with fire and observation and there are sufficient mobile reserves. A fine piece of OSINT analysis from @Inkvisiit. End.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mick Ryan, AM

Mick Ryan, AM Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WarintheFuture

May 9
In warfare, an important target is often the enemy commander and the headquarters that assists them to plan and execute military operations. A thread on #Gerasimov, failure and the coming Ukrainian offensives. 1/25 🧵 Image
2/ Killing a senior military leader can result in slower planning and decision making. This can lead to a break down in the cohesion of a large military force, allowing friendly forces to attack them or exploit tactical opportunities while they can’t respond effectively.
3/ The Chinese call this Systems Destruction Warfare. It is an extraordinarily effective approach if planned and coordinated well, particularly given the reliance on communications, sensors and AI-based decision support tools by modern militaries.
Read 25 tweets
May 6
Over the past week, there has been a lot of attention devoted to the attack on the Kremlin, as well as the Ukrainian preparations for their offensives. Today, I want to explore the Legacy of #Bakhmut. 1/12 🧵🇺🇦 Image
2/ It is never too soon to learn from war, particularly for those who find themselves in the middle of it. And I think there are some important insights that might be gleaned from #Bakhmut.
3/ There has been debate about whether Ukraine should have stayed or withdrawn. This is an important debate, but there are very few people who have the requisite information to have made this decision.
Read 12 tweets
Apr 30
Undoubtedly, H-Hour (the time set for a planned attack) for the forthcoming Ukrainian offensives is drawing near. For months, Ukrainian planners and strategic leaders preparing. How might we assess the success of the offensives to come? 1/22 🧵 Image
2/ In my previous post on this topic, I described the rationale for measures of success & failure. I also listed five principles for their development and application. Success in the coming offensives can be measured at different levels and over different timescales.
3/ Progress will be assessed by multitudes of analysts, journalists, politicians and citizens. At the same time, some will quickly jump on short term tactical setbacks instead of waiting a few days to assess the full implications of such incidents.
Read 22 tweets
Apr 27
Recently, there has been discussion about the strategic and political importance of the Ukrainian offensives that are likely to be launched in the coming weeks or months. The focus of these articles has often been about the consequences of failure. 1/25 🧵 Image
2/ As a 24 April New York Times article argues, “without a decisive victory, Western support for #Ukraine could weaken, and #Kyiv could come under increasing pressure to enter serious negotiations to end or freeze the conflict.” nytimes.com/2023/04/24/us/…
3/ But what does victory look like? One of the weaknesses in the speculation about future Ukrainian offensives is that there is no definition of victory. There are no clear descriptions of how success or failure might be measured or perceived in Ukraine, Russia or in the West.
Read 25 tweets
Apr 17
Contrary to the many ‘Russian are stupid’ stereotypes that have developed throughout the war, they have demonstrated an ability in some areas to learn and adapt. This isn’t a statement of admiration. 1/25 🧵 Image
2/ It is however necessary to understand Russian #adaptation. In understanding it, we can ensure Ukrainian forces understand tactical and operational risks, and that they are best prepared for the offensives ahead. mickryan.substack.com/p/the-russians…
3/ Several areas of Russian adaptation during this war bear closer examination stand out: strategic adaptation; operational adaptation; and tactical adaptation. In this thread I will explore some areas of tactical adaptation.
Read 25 tweets
Apr 16
Lots of recent speculation on forthcoming offensives in Ukraine. As such, a short thread that refers to some of my recent articles on this topic. 1/10 🧵
2/ First, an examination of Russian goals for 2023. This provides context for Ukrainian decision making and how it might think about its offensives.
mickryan.substack.com/p/divining-rus…
3/ And here is another piece from late last month. abc.net.au/news/2023-03-2…
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(