Darth Autocrat (Lyndon NA) Profile picture
May 11 9 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
.
:: Google - using NLP and LLMs ::

So, G have invested Millions into advancing their algorithms, developing cutting edge approaches to parsing content and identifying important information.

But …

… rather than using it for "Ranking"
… they chose to steal Traffic.

#SEO
>>>

And this isn't the first time Google have committed such an offence.

Every few years, they make changes to the SERPs,
to benefit "their users".

> Knowledge Panel
> Featured Snippets
> People Also Ask
> FAQs

Each such addition - reduces traffic ...

>>>
>>>

... from the very sites that G are obtaining that content from!

And the plans for their AI addition (#Magi) is no different.
It will utilise content from 1+ sources,
and present it to "their users",
(similar to a FS, but a generated composite).

>>>
>>>

There are multiple problems with this.

The biggest one … the one that G insists on ignoring...
… is …
… they are Not Google's Users!

They are ours, yours, mine!

Google is the flaming middle-ware.
Without sites, without pages, without our content,
G would not exist
>>>
>>>

Next up, is G thinks you're stupid!

They honestly seem to believe that the vast majority of business owners are thick,
and don't realise the harm that G is causing.

They've been stealing your traffic for years,
and gotten away with it each and every time.

>>>
>>>

(Note: Not just G - others are doing it too ... there's something about "tech companies" that seems to involve a lack of fucking morality, and considering themselves above the law etc. That should be sending alarm bells off, if they are in charge of AI!)

>>>
>>>

Then there's the evasion.

Google knows full well that they are harming your businesses.

Though they do not openly admit it,
you can see it by the lack of data.

Google refuses
(despite many requests each/every year!)
to provide Impression and Click data!

>>>
>>>

And the insult.

Google sits there, spewing bollocks about working with content creators,
knowing full well they created and pushed the content-economy,
with plans to milk it dry,
and would be in a position so that refusal to comply would be untenable.

Extortion?

>>>
>>>

So please, do everyone a favour,
make sure your clients know and understand
that Google are thieving scum bags,
with no good intent for their business,
and fully intend to steal their traffic and harm their income.

Any comments @searchliaison

Data maybe?
🤣🤣🤣🤣

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Darth Autocrat (Lyndon NA)

Darth Autocrat (Lyndon NA) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @darth_na

May 10
We can always try asking
(again).

Hey, anyone at @googlesearchc, or maybe @JohnMu or @searchliaison ...

Does Google actually try to verify experience or expertise,
or is it based on linguistics/phrasing?

#SEO #EEAT
My money is on it being linguistics/phrasing.

G simply cannot know if Bob bought the giant pink 18" floppy dragon pillow (yeah, some of you went there!), or is simply making it up.

(Note: they may be able to guess if Bob's full of shit though, due to 34K reviews in a week ;))
For example ... you're a person, not a machine.
You have good judgement, right?

So you know I made this up...
Read 8 tweets
May 9
1/🧵
:: SEO by looking at the Rankings ::

Yes / No / Maybe.

The problems here are:
1) Correlation
2) Shallow observation
3) Copy cats
4) Many factors are small/tiny, and don't show any visible impact at the top of the SERPs for high-volume/high-value terms

But ...
>>>

#SEO
2/?
>>>

The first 2 points go hand in hand.
Consider things like "long form content" and "word count".

Those are purely correlative - they are Not actual factors.

But, when you look, you see tons of top ranking pages about X have more than N words...

>>>
3/?
>>>

Copy cats can be quite funny.
When in the Google Forums, we were blessed with witnessing things like:

<meta name="PageRank" content="7">

<meta name="position" content="1">

(I shit you not!)

But it happens with links etc. too
(as G doesn't hammer most offenders)

>>>
Read 9 tweets
Feb 13
1/🧵
🚨:: Does Google use Bounce Back Rate? ::🚨

*sigh*
It's not even 2 years since I last covered this!

🧵>>>

#SEO #BounceRate #BounceBackRate #BounceBackToSERP Image
2/?

Here's the thread I did at the end of 2021...



But if you don't want to read through that,
I'll do a quick summary here...

>>>
3/?

Bounce Rate (BR) is an "Analytics" metric.
Dwell Time is a made up metric.
Click Through Rate (CTR) is a SERP metric.

G have stated none are used for Rankings.

But they "do" use user-behaviour in the SERP,
for various things (such as gauging algo performance etc.).

>>>
Read 13 tweets
Jan 31
.
:: Prioritisation ::

For me, it's an indication that the SEO sector has matured.

A substantial % of people aren't focused on:
* lists
* tool scores
* number of keywords
* vanity term rankings
or even
* what moves the SERP needle

>>>

#SEO
>>>

Instead, there has been a significant shift to:
* what contributes to the businesses goal(s),
* what is readily achievable with the resources available,
* how to present needs/requirements to get them implemented,
* understanding of resource allocation

>>>
>>>

As time goes by, SEO grows from being a specialised and highly misunderstood "extra",
to a core aspect of marketing,
and is causing businesses to mature (as there's a shocking number of them that don't grasp marketing in general either!).

>>>
Read 9 tweets
Jan 29
.
I'm torn on this one.

I deeply value experience, and invested time in learning.

But, as someone that was once young,
and often frustrated at the stupidity I saw in various roles,
I know that "age" is the wrong proxy-metric.

>>>
>>>

It's the inverse of "time served"
(another thing that always irritated me - the assumption that because someone has done the job for X years, they are good at it!).

Some people are smart, others sharp, others invested time/effort learning/research years ago.

>>>
>>>

Some people may have passive experience (family business, spent lots of time soaking up insights from someone in that role etc.).

Others are able to transfer/adapt what they have,
and apply it sideways to something else.

>>>
Read 4 tweets
Jan 29
.
:: Test - but prioritise based on Experience! ::

I'm a fan of the "test everything" concept,
but the reality is - most of us don't, and in many cases, you can't.

It's also costly.

So, same as with everything else,
you should Prioritise!

#Marketing #SEO

>>>
>>>

Though markets may differ,
industries respond differently,
audiences react in various ways ...
... there are "safer bets", and "more probable" performers.

We know this based on experience (and even prior tests).

So you go with those as your baseline!

>>>
>>>

You then divvy up the resources,
and allocate a % to "the wilds" - those that you have no experience/knowledge of, those that seem a little out there, those you may have doubts over.

Those still need testing
(if only to shut someone in a chair up!).

>>>
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(