Why is Google Bard introduced in 180 countries but not in Netherlands, France, Germany, Spain or any other EU country? In the next few tweets I will try to give a possible explanation.
The potential compliance issues with upcoming "AI regulations" in Europe could be a concern for large language models like Google Bard. These proposed regulations are still in a nebulous stage and have not been enacted into law. The European Union's perspective is that AI should… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Reason 1 why Bard is not yet in EU. Understanding how AI makes decisions is crucial. The EU's proposed regulations emphasize this, but it's a tough task for Large Language Models (LLMs). Their complex decision-making process isn't easily interpretable, making full transparency a… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
2. Risk to Fundamental Rights
If an LLM is used in a way that could pose a risk to people's fundamental rights, such as privacy or non-discrimination, it might not comply with the regulation. For example, if an LLM is trained on data that includes biased or discriminatory web… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
3. Data Governance
Quality data is key to reliable AI. EU's proposed AI regulations stress this. But if an LLM is trained on a dataset with errors or biases, it could lead to unreliable outputs. Good data governance is essential for trustworthy AI. #AI#DataGovernancetwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
4. Human Oversight
Human oversight is vital in AI systems. The EU's proposed AI regulations require this, especially for high-risk AI systems. Depending on how an LLM is used, it might need more robust human oversight mechanisms. Let's keep humans in the AI loop. #AI… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
5. Current law
Google Bard and similar AI systems could already now potentially run afoul of EU and Canadian regulations on data protection, intellectual property, and consumer rights. Ensuring AI compliance with these rules is essential for safeguarding our digital rights #aitwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
I am researching lies of chat bots like chatGPT & infringement of private data. I couldn’t have wished for a better example (see screenshot). Read more about this on @Redditreddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comm…
It spilled out a list of murderers and refused to remove the data when I, as an experiment, revealed a surprise fact : (2/4)
And Bard bot is lying about removing personal data (used random name). It doesn’t remove any personal data at all when you request it (3/4)
Trying to sing up for the four new Google services outside the US? Here is a short manual. 1. Use a so called obfuscated VPN 2. Google Account --> US address
Here is a separate thread about fact checking and io.google/2023/
Live translation including lip syncing of foreign footage
Live lip-synced translation will be available for "certified partners" and it will contain watermarks. Other news for fact checkers: there will be new options for checking out photos in Google Lens. It will give you "About this Image" in a few weeks. You can sort on dates so you… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Most of the coming AI products that generate stuff will contain metadata and watermarks, so we can follow them back to the original.
My upcoming newsletter emphasizes the importance of #ChatGPT in open source intelligence and research. #ChatGPT 4.0 accurately identified me through the "analyze (link)". Its ability to analyze photos from WordPress sites seems to be remarkable. #AI#Research#OpenSource (1/4) twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
But you do have to keep in mind that the outcome completely depends on what you did earlier in the chat. If you were ego-surfing and only then would ask to analyze a link with your face, it has context and will give you often your name. (2/4)
Face detection by #chatgpt also feels stunning because it reads the whole link, that often has the name of the person already in it, like this example (3/4)
It was inevitable. Spammers use #ChatGPT to create fake websites using natural language processing. It allows malicious actors to quickly generate bogus sites that generate revenue from ads or other malicious content. Next few tweets: how is it done? (1/4)
Just 24 hours ago, a certain Pallab G. started to sell for around $9 an automated workflow that includes #chatgpt. The unlisted video is in this tweet, at at the time of writing, had 4 views, including 3 of mine,
#chatgpt writes a main page of a website, including photo suggestions, as you can see in this example "Write the main page of a website, including photo suggestions, about how to travel in
Arizona when you are on a tight budget, have no income, and can't … twitter.com/i/web/status/1…