We are often wrong....15% for cycle bottoms, but right 85% of the time. Often 50% initial draw downs bag 10x, as the sitting proves out in our favour. We can't be right unless we are wrong in the very short term.
Theme and Position sizing is key...
Each new asymmetric theme has a 5-7% weighting
Each position within the theme has a 1-2% weighting
Most themes produce 8-13x returns on average
If we are extremely compelled, which is very irregular, but is aligned with putting the buckets out, we will go to 20% in a theme and up to 5% in a position.
This would be for a repeatable asymmetric theme we have been successful in multiple times in the last 40 years.
A repeatable theme for us is near global market crashes:
1987 generally worldwide
1997 Asian financial crisis
2001/02 Post tech bubble and Tightening cycle
2008 GFC
2023/24 Tightening cycle
= 95% success rate for 10x returns within 60 months of the market bottom.
Why is this a 95% success rate?
- entry valuations are extremely depressed
- often 15-20yr stockprice lows in high beta stocks/sectors
- extreme hate & negative expectations are built in near cycle bottoms
- massive wealth destruction from peak to lows of 75% for beta chasers
Since we build up our dry powder in 2021, where has deployment occurred since:
#Russianstocks March 2022 +7x (expect 12x through 2026, $SBER >35x)
Thought of the day: A reminder for our followers, each new asymmetric theme should be restricted to a 5-7% portfolio weighting with around 5 stocks positions to mitigate stock specific risks in each theme. Incoming themes over the next 6 months: #regionalbanks#REITs etc
- we are approaching entry into the eye of the storm, this will likely need to play out 75% prior to serious capital deployment (6 months +).
- shoes to drop include freezing lending markets, deposits moving to higher yields etc
Let some bottoming clarity take place...as in the short term, what was strong yesterday, may not be tomorrow, the rate of change can be swift until the environment settles.
#uranium facts for last week are in ....900klbs traded
Utilities joined in but didn't dominate Vs traders #uranium
Another 2-3mlb pounds to be taken out through the end of May if blue skies are to be enjoyed. But to sustain higher levels, Utilities will need to dominate, near term (<24 months) contracting books need to be nearing capacity to result in continued upward momentum. #uranium
For those pre-production #uranium caps (<US$150m size) raising money to take them towards the Final Investment Decision, this should come as no surprise, one should build into their models dilution as follows:
$55 spot = likely 50-65% dilution if capex is funded at this point
1/3
$65 spot = 45-55%
$75 spot = 40-50%
$85 spot = 35-45%
Hence our view that buying < 0.7x peak CF 3-4 years out undiluted = 0.9-1.2x diluted = 4-5x upside.
Those trading at <0.5x = 6-8x upside.
2/3
Funding a project at $85 spot implying > $50lb cash margins for 3-5mlb capacity = operating CF US$150-250m 3-4 yrs out
A) job losses and no savings to pay the mortgage, with 35% drop in the property value to exit it.
B) those high on margin will get called and massively hit, likely account implosion
C) 75% wealth hits for those not understanding incoming risks
Survival action to be taken now:
- Dial back unnecessary expenditure
- Pay off credit card debt
- Build a savings buffer > 9 months of expenditure
- Close out margin positions
- Sell non essential assets to build liquidity for incoming risk (job loss, refinancing risk etc)