Many click-friendly posts for #MentalHealthAwarenessWeek, saying 'seek help', 'open up' etc.

Well, here's something to be 'aware' of

Recent research by @Rethink_ suggests 3 in 5 people with mental health problems don't seek help... due to stigma

rethink.org/news-and-stori…

/1
@Rethink_ It's a drum I've banged often, but it's still pertinent

Mental health 'awareness' is an important first step, but it's not an end point. And for too many, being aware of/acknowledging mental health issues is taken to mean the problem's dealt with

theguardian.com/science/brain-…

/2
@Rethink_ But this is wrong, in so many ways

Being part of an online community where everyone is open and honest about their #MentalHealth is great. Often essential. But that doesn't mean everyone enjoys a similar situation. Indeed, the majority seemingly don't.

/3
@Rethink_ In many ways, the discussion around #MentalHealth mirrors the one around the climate crisis

"So, we agree that the problem is real and very serious, yes?"

"Yup"

"So, shall we to try to... fix it?"

"Woah! That'll be expensive and disruptive! I'm sure it'll work out OK"

/4
@Rethink_ Don't get me wrong; getting to a point where the majority seem, at least on the surface, to accept that #mentalhealth problems are real and should be taken seriously, that's good. And shows impressive progress, even within recent memory.

/5
@Rethink_ For example, it was well within the last two decades that we regularly saw mainstream articles describing those with depression as 'attention seeking', that all they needed was fresh air/exercise etc.

You *still* get this, but it's more of a fringe view than it once was

/6
@Rethink_ But, back to the original point, it's still bleakly common to see people who clearly think that acknowledging mental health problems is the same as 'fixing' them. And this ignores the true scope of the problem, and the considerable efforts needed to really fix them

/7
@Rethink_ Seems churlish to object to things that are, presumably, well intended, but "The road to hell" etc.

Basically, this casual "it's all fine" approach to #mentalhealth can, and regularly does, have very negative consequences, even if they're subtle ones.

/8
@Rethink_ One obvious issue with assuming that everyone's "aware" of mental health problems, and therefore no more needs to be done, is that... nothing gets done? Existing problems carry on existing, and maybe get worse because people assume they're sorted out now.

/9
@Rethink_ I mean, thinking that we've 'moved beyond' mental health stigma is a problem when... we haven't?

As @Rethink_'s research suggests, *most* people experiencing mental health issues are still deeply affected by stigma. Pretending they aren't won't help

rethink.org/news-and-stori…

/10
@Rethink_ Another factor I've flagged up repeatedly:

Assuming that 'everyone' is aware of #mentalhealth and it's 'not an issue' often leads to making often leads to things that make life HARDER for dealing with problems with their own.

/11
@Rethink_ My own personal bugbear here is the 'Toxic Positivity' phenomenon

cosmicshambles.com/words/blogs/de…

The idea that you can 'choose' to be happy, to have good wellbeing? It's a short leap from there to blaming people for their own #mentalhealth problems. Because they chose 'wrongly'

/12
@Rethink_ Less stark, but more insidious, is stuff like this, flagged up by @Hayleystevens (and @specileptic on Facebook)

Again, it may be 100% well meant. But it still conveys the idea that #mentalhealth issues are

1. Easily addressed
2. All on you to do so



/12
Technically, these things do reduce anxiety, *to an extent*

But packaging them like this, and not differentiating between everyday and *clinical* anxiety? It's like saying "Covered in enraged wasps? Try some camomile tea, and avoid wasps in future"

Yeah, cheers for that

/13 Image
'Take smarphone breaks' or 'get fresh air' in response to national #MentalHealth problems? It's like the old "Climate crisis? That's on you guys. Use paper straws, and eat more lentils" tactic

i.e. affected individuals with limited power are expected to solely deal with it

/14
And then there's the whole "We ALL have mental health issues, we ALL need self-care" etc. attitude.

I don't want to say that it's basically a #mentalhealth equivalent of "Well, *I* don't see colour..."

But I am going to say that. Because I think it often is the case.

/15
Then there's the way that increased #MentalHealth awareness, for all the good it can and does do, has also meant that aspects of it have been co-opted and exploited for more nefarious ends. Again, whether intended or not.

/16
For instance, people will now regularly say they are 'a little bit OCD' because they're somewhat fastidious.

theguardian.com/science/brain-…

You're not. You don't have 'a bit' of a serious compulsive disorder. You're just fussy.

/17
Also, the increased awareness of #mentalhealth awareness and assessment means you get a lot more 'armchair' diagnosis now. By people who are utterly unqualified to diagnose, and wouldn't have the necessary info to do so even if they were

theguardian.com/science/brain-…

/18
Armchair diagnosis is a real worry for me. It means people end up attributing any negative quality about a person to an underlying #MentalHealth issue. And if any and every bad aspect of people is linked to mental health problems, do you THINK that may be a tad stigmatising?

/19

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dean Burnett (@Garwboy@ohai.social)

Dean Burnett (@Garwboy@ohai.social) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @garwboy

May 15
Judging from the reaction to this... a lot of people care about ADHD diagnosis being represented fairly and accurately

It's almost like it's an issue you really shouldn't casually exploit and misrepresent for clicks, or something. Who knew?
For the record, I don't (as far as I or anyone else knows) have ADHD

But I have many individuals, who I value greatly and/or who are very close to me, who have recently been diagnosed ADHD, and you'd better believe I'll go to the bat for them in any context

/2
Some may jump on this as a way to discredit me, to dismiss my critique of the #Panorama #ADHD investigation. Because I should, after all, be totally impartial, not influenced by defending people I care about?

To which I'd say...

/3
Read 5 tweets
May 15
OK then, you want to play? Let's do this

Here's a thread of every red flag I can identify in this article, and why they're misleading/dangerous/just generally bad

Strap in, because there are lot of them.

/1
So, even the article summary is dubious

How did you get access to a 'Leading NHS consultant', mate? The vast majority of people dealing with (potential ADHD) have to wait years for such a thing. Surely you didn't just jump the queue by flashing your BBC credentials?

/1 Image
Also, minor point perhaps, but if the OPENING PARAGRAPH of your prominent piece for the highly respected national broadcaster is already promoting, by accident or design, an 'Online mental health assessments aren't valid' view, that's potentially MASSIVELY damaging

/2 Image
Read 36 tweets
Apr 18
Was recently asked which scientific 'myth' I'd like to see banished forever

Obviously, given my field and output, I had to choose 'we only use 10% of our brains'

A common moan, sure. But it's not just a silly thing that leads to shoddy movie plots. It's worse than that

/1
For one thing, the origins of the 'we only use 10% of our brain' notion are unclear. But analysis suggests it came about *at least* a century ago. Believe it or not, our understanding of the brain has improved by orders of magnitude since then

/2
And that's assuming that the 10% of the brain myth stems from valid contemporary 19th/early 20th century science. But there's no conclusive evidence for this. At best it arose via word-of-mouth distortions or misunderstandings of scientific findings at the time

/2
Read 18 tweets
Apr 16
This is so wrong that it actually violates the laws of spacetime, loops back on itself, and ends up being 100% wrong, repeatedly, in multiple ways, all at the same time
This Goodwin berk getting SO MUCH AIRTIME is a legitimate disgrace by the UK media

Imagine if the big papers handed all their premier league coverage over to a part time Grimsby town goalkeeper, still bitter about his failed trial at QPR

This is the academic equivalent of that
Seriously, I bet I could be a millionaire within months if I wanted. Cherry pick some studies that I could spin as 'proving' that women/immigrants/homosexuals etc are 'neurologically inferior', use my profile to put my 'discoveries' out there, and ride the hate-filled gravy train
Read 4 tweets
Mar 6
Thursday: "The Johnson family suffered during lockdown, broke the rules they enforced on the rest of us, and we should all feel sorry for them"

Monday: Boris Johnson nominates father Stanley for Knighthood, for services to domestic abuse, or something

It's. So. Enraging!
Reminder:
Literal millions of us lost loved ones during the pandemic. Many may have been spared if PM Johnson had made better decisions

We all obeyed the rules (with harsh penalties) Johnson imposed, painful as they were. Because it was the law, and others could have died

/2
And what did our trauma and sacrifice get from the media and powers-that-be? Usually, a brief new digit on the rolling death toll, and regular reminders that our experiences ranked lower than people's desire to go back to the pub

/3
Read 10 tweets
Feb 17
There's actually a lot of weird neuroscience/psychology that leads to this persistent phenomenon of 'aggressively defending the wealthy and powerful', including

- The Just World Hypothesis
- Parasocial relationships
- Social identification

So here's another explainer thread

/1
Firstly, what's the 'Just World' hypothesis? It's the cognitive bias where we tend to assume the world is fair and 'just'. That good actions are rewarded, and bad actions are punished. Perceived (un)fairness is something humans are 'wired' to react to

nature.com/articles/srep0…

/2
Despite being, you know, wrong, the Just World hypothesis makes evolutionary sense. If we felt the results of our actions/decisions were random, we'd not be motivated to do anything good. We're a cooperative species by nature, so that'd be unehlpful

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-worl…

/3
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(