People are asking LLMs to write stories like a waking mind does, then declaring their own supremacy as creators when tools structured to work like the dreaming mind spit out what have always been described by the engineers as dreams rather than coherent waking-state narratives.
The extra funny part is people thinking that in an era perhaps most accurately characterized as a collective psychedelic experience, the waking-mind economy is somehow going to maintain its tide wall against this tsunami of unconscious material.
Bad trip recipe, that.
It's like the foolishness of expecting kids to think like adults. These are distinctly different modes of cognition that exist together in an ecology of strategies adapted for different purposes. Exploration-tuned systems are vital complements to exploitation-tuned systems.
You can't have it both ways and simultaneously deride LLMs for their inability to write like humans while also fearing the replacement of human writers in the labor market. First of all, this incents the very thing you fear. Second, it misses out on the most interesting… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Alan Turing had the sense to note that asking whether a computer can think is like whether a submarine can swim. I'm disappointed in how many otherwise intelligent people are responding to LLMs like British 19th century anthropologists claiming other cultures can't reason.
At the same time I'm totally unsurprised that anyone would treat unfamiliar modes of intelligence as lesser in a society that has so thoroughly failed to recognize the value of dreaming, imagination, childhood play, and the arts, and systematically pathologized neurodiversity.
We're talking about the only society in the history of humankind that's waged war against the unconscious mind with artificial lighting, television, treating plant medicines as "hallucinogens," concerted efforts to eradicate "useless" sleep, questing for the eradication of noise.
We're talking about a society that feared the loss of a supposedly rational modern self and the madness of groups, that has systematically oppressed congregation and nearly every altered state in the collective toolkit of human culture in an effort to maintain political order...
Well, I have bad news for all of you 21st century cognitive Puritans. There's a reason that animal intelligence research, psychedelics research, and LLM research is all exploding at the same time. We need more than one kind of mind to get us out of the mess that centuries of… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
What follows is some recommended reading for those struggling to see beyond the corset of the modern mind's horizon. For your own sake I hope you remember what it was like as a child and can face with grace what it will be like in old age... return.life/p/the-future-i… @returndotlife
Here is one of my favorite recordings on radical cognitive diversity: a deep discussion with animal cognition and music researcher Patricia Gray on #FutureFossils.
Big thanks to @Interspecies_io for being the reason for my meeting Dr. Gray back in 2018!
I'm not keen on reducing what dreams are to MERELY this, since traits often evolve for different reasons than their apparent function and since dreams have… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
📣 I can't stress this enough: #LLMs are designed to reflect and amplify what we feed them. They're like kids, or psychedelics. (My friend @NeseLSD co-authored a superb paper on #psychedelics as non-specific amplifiers I will post… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
1️⃣ Okay, so! My first point in response to all of the fear-mongering and doomsaying in the tech world right now — beyond the obvious, which is that there's an inherent conflict in hastily bringing forth tools you fear and maybe that's worth some personal reflection, because it's… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
♻️ Side Note: I plan on writing all of this up into a more thorough and well-formatted article with an extensive bibliography, but for the time being I want to drop a couple of relevant tweets that serendipitously came up in my feed today.
🧵 I was recently accused of being a cynical dystopian, but disagree. Since I just finished the first draft of my book on plurality in speculative futurism as a consequence of embracing complexity and entropy, here's my "in case anyone cares" rebuttal:
1/n
My point is subtler than that. It's that as things get simultaneously better AND worse, and the scale of the problems continues to grow and the timetable to accelerate, it becomes harder to understand, and to intervene.
2/n
So the problem isn't any one problem and our ability to solve it but the overall issue of escalation, or "swallowing the spider to catch the fly."
3/n
@tobyshorin See also @erik_davis' numerous insightful commentaries on the innate compatibility of Mormonism and Extropianism ("Get your own cosmos!"), which formed a major inspiration for this piece from 2011: michaelgarfield.medium.com/godhood-is-bor…
...see also Roko's Basilisk and re-animism and and and
@tobyshorin@erik_davis@nybooks See also the shift from the tallest building in the city being a church to the tallest building in the city being a bank.