Australian FM @SenatorWong is not saying PM Albanese's China visit is #preconditioned on China making progress on lifting trade sanctions & detained Australians. Rather, China doing so would be very #conducive to such a visit. /1
@SenatorWong In Penny Wong's own carefully chosen words: "I would say that we would want to see continued progress and the most positive circumstances for any visit by the Prime Minister, and I think #China would understand that." /2
This is Australia learning from China's playbook but doing it with more grace.
China's typical rhetorical playbook: 1. When in a foul mood: Other countries need to repent and address China's grievances (e.g. 14 grievances) before China would restore senior bilateral talks etc./3
2. When in a ok mood: Other countries should make progress on things China cares/is annoyed about in order to "create conducive atmosphere for dialogue".
But without specifying what rewards other countries, e.g. AUS, would get if they accede to China's wish. /4
'coz in negotiations once China spell it out, it's more costly for it to backtrack later without looking like it's being a bad faith negotiator or 'rocking the boat'. In game theory we call this installing a 'commitment device' -- tying your own hands to show you're serious. /5
Penny Wong here is taking the relatively higher-road here. Let's call it option 3: She seems to be doing option 2, excepts that she is more forthcoming in spelling out the deliverable (Albanese visiting China). /6
Wong's precise language is what ALP does to balance signaling good faith to Beijing with controlling risk of getting seen as kowtowing domestically.
China's MFA has enough smart people to get her message. Let's hope they have the audacity to respond positively, too. /7
China's further lifting of trade sanctions against AUS, and at minimum greater transparency re situations of Aussies detained in China (e.g. Cheng Lei & Yang Hengjun) will make life easier for anyone who like to see AUS-CHI relations improve, which is in Beijing's own interest./8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
China's President Xi Jinping's alma mater Tsinghua University just released a survey named "China Unfiltered: The Chinese People's View on National Security". (“无滤镜的中国”:中国人的国际安全观调查)
What did the survey find? A thread. /1🧵
Tsinghua University is widely known as one of China's 'Big 2' universities (along with PKU), and is arguably the most politically connected one -- having produced 4 out of the last 6 Presidents and Premiers, including Xi Jinping (pictured in 1975 at his send-off to Tsinghua)./2
This survey is done by Tsinghua's CISS (Center for International Strategy and Security), and has made 8 findings. /2
1. Almost 80% of Chinese people believe they have 'great' (36%) or 'good' (41.3%) understanding of international security. /3
My quotes for @CNN, on US House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s changing his Taiwan trip into a in-person meeting with #Taiwan’s President @iingwen in California.
@CNN@iingwen Tsai’s potential meeting with Kevin McCarthy in California is not necessarily a “replacement or downgrade, but an add-on”, or a bonus.
McCarthy could always visit Taiwan at a later date. 2/
Taiwan is balancing multiple needs here.
1. A visit by yet another US House Speaker (after Nancy Pelosi) could #normalize high-level visits by American officials, and consolidate earlier gains. /3
China's cabinet & CCP party issue a new directive that calls for "resolute opposition and boycott of erroneous Western concepts such as 'constitutional rule' and 'separation of powers'".
2/ This likely forebodes more constitutional reform to come at next week's annual two sessions (China's parliament session).
Specifically it hints at further enshrining of Xi and Xi Jinping thought into the constitution.
3/ Namely either 'two establishes' and/or 'two safeguards' (兩個確立 and 兩個維護) may make their way into China's constitution. The latter had already being incorporated into the party charter at 20th PC last October.
#China releases its comprehensive official position paper on #Ukraine today.
It seems like: 1) a very thinly veiled attempt to help Russia achieve an upper hand over Ukraine, though 2) superficially disguised as a call for peace to deflect Western criticism. A short🧵
2/ Paper's Point 2 calls for 'prevent #bloc confrontation"' (防止形成陣營對抗).
What does that mean? It means nobody should help Ukraine. Russia is on its own and has essentially no 'bloc' or other countries overtly helping it. But Ukraine does...
3/ Ukraine gets significant ongoing assistance from Western countries.
So when China says the Ukraine-Russia war should not be a contest between 'blocs', China is effectively saying Ukraine shouldn't get support from other countries in the Western camp.
As US alleges China is providing 'non-lethal support' for Russia, China's MFA fires back and blames US for giving weapons to Ukraine.
This is in line with longstanding Chinese view. PSA: Back in Sept 2022, China effectively said that Russia's war against Ukraine is a #JustWar./1
2/ The closest thing to a direct official Chinese judgment of the nature of that war so far (AFAIK) comes from China's #3 leader, National People's Congress Speaker Li Zhanshu.
3/ When Li Zhanshu visited Russia in Sept 2022, he told Russian Duma's speaker that "China understands and supports matters concerning Russia's core interests."
("在涉及俄罗斯核心利益和一些重大关键问题上,中方对俄罗斯表示充分的理解和支持。")