1. It gladdens my heart to know that 1947 was not merely a secular transition of power, but it had a ritualistic element in the form of #Sengol or Dharma-Danda given to the new head of Indian State accompanied by ritualistic performances.
2. For me this ritual establishment of Dharma-Danda (#Sengol) is more important than the establishment of independent, but secular state. However, the subsequent sidelining of it by putting in some museum under the heading of 'Golden Stick' though unfortunate is not surprising.
3. Indian State has been inimical to Hindu interests since independence, so sidelining of #Sengol is not surprising. However, I feel its re-establishment in the new parliamentary building is a good nimitta (indication) that may be there could be change of winds in coming decades.
4. There is an excellent discussion on Dharma Danda- the Dharma called Danda (punishment) in Manusmriti Chapter 7 which brings out the true meaning, significance, and full implication of #Sengol.
5. Essentially, the #Sengol is the Dharma-Danda or Dharma in its aspect of punishment personified as Danda (sceptre) signifies the power which establishes the rule of Dharma, protects all the creatures, and brings harmony and prosperity to one and hand.
6. It signifies antidote to anarchy. It signifies antidote to Matsya-nyaya (might is right) & a State infused with power of Devatas for creating order through a creation of duty-based world-order. A State whose foundation is in Dharma as enunciated in Veda & Smritis.
7. Whether Indian State will truly embrace Dharma-Danda and what it represents and fully realize its purpose by becoming a Dharmika state, a full-fledged Hindu Samrajya in the coming decades, or whether adoption of #Sengol will merely remain symbolic, the times ahead will tell.
* correction in Tweet 6: I meant- "it signifies a state infused with power of Devatas" [In case this was not clear]
8. And to add to the whole thing, on the top of #Sengol stands Vrishabha, the Bull of Dharma, the eternal symbol and personification of Dharma Devata itself.
9. The Puranas tell us that this Bull has four legs which stand for Satya, Daya, Tapas, and Shaucha all important characteristics relevant to the Dharmika State & it's Head.
10. In this context, since the attention has been drawn to notion of #Dharma & Bull of Dharma atop #Sengol,resharing the link to my book 'Samanya Dharma', which provides a brief, but comprehensive introduction to Dharma-amazon.in/SAMANYA-DHARMA…
1. I had previously mentioned how while Smritis enunciate 'What' of Dharma, Bhagavad Gita enunciates among 'How' of Dharma.
Here are some verses that clearly bring out the same.
2. [A] On What Dharma to be performed:
Manusmriti 1.2: May Thou, O blessed One, explain to us, in due form and in proper order, the duties of all Varnas and intermediate ones.
3. Manusmriti 1.107: Herein has been expounded Dharma in its entirety: the good and bad features of actions of all the four Varnas; as also eternal (principles) dharma.
1. One of the reasons why Smriti guidelines are misunderstood is because we forget that those stipulations and prohibitions are from the standpoint of Dharma. However, on the ground, we have to take into consideration Artha and Kama as well.
2. Take for example, the Smriti position that the foremost Dharma for women that could lead to their overall wellbeing is Pativrata-Dharma, so much so that it is sometimes conflated with Streedharma.
3. However, this is a statement strictly from the standpoint of Dharma, i.e. the Shastras are delineating the path through which women can attain Abhyudaya & Nishreyasa.
1. Why should one practice Dharma as revealed by Sruti and Smriti? Why should one live a Dharmika live?
Manusmriti gives an interesting answer to this in Chapter 4.
2. Without causing pain to any beings, he shall, for purpose of obtaining a companion in other world, accumulate Dharma, slowly; just as the white ants accumulate the ant-hill.—(Manu 4.238)
3. There, neither father, nor mother, nor wife, nor sons, nor relations stay as companions; Dharma alone remains.—(Manu 4.239)
Alone is a creature born, and alone does it cease to be; alone it enjoys its good deeds and also its evil deeds.—(Manu 4.240)
1. One argument one often hears from Hindus is, when we have Bhagavad Gita which also teaches Dharma, why do we need Smritis?
2. This question is not only a result of ignorance about what Gita says [16.24: scriptures (Veda, Smriti, etc.) are basis that determines what actions be performed & what be avoided] but also result of ignorance about core difference between Dharma Upadesha in Gita & in Smritis.
3. While what Gita teaches is primarily about 'How Dharma has to be performed', what Smritis teaches is primarily about 'What constitutes Dharma & what Adharma'.
1. Adi Shankaracharya at one place writes "asampradayavit murkhavat upekshaniya"- those who are not learned in the teaching tradition are to be ignored as fools.
2. 'Sampradaya' here refers to 'teaching tradition' or the 'Guru-Shishya mode of transmission of knowledge'. This could be understood as an advice about how to approach and study Shastras. But that is not the only dimension here.
3. Sampradaya or teaching tradition not only refers to the direct transmission from Guru-Shishya but also to the textual tradition produced from such Sampradaya, most notably the tradition of commentaries.
1. Abortion remains Adharma irrespective of context because it involves preventing a Jiva who was about to take birth from doing so. However, how it practically plays out is complicated. Some thoughts on this in this tweet thread.
2. When abortion is carried to save the life of the mother, then even though there is Papam involved in such abortion, in a larger scheme that was the Dharmic choice as the saving of the mother's life takes precedence.
3. Life is never black and white. We are often given with choices which are different shades of grey and this being the case we must choose the choice which is closer to white as much as possible.