A 🧵on an interesting development in #Australia regarding COVID-19 vaccine digital certificate which is generated using the Australian Immunisation Register (AIR) which is a national register that records vaccinations given to people of all ages in Australia.
Australians had (still have to in some work sectors) to provide a copy of the COVID-19 digital certificate to their employers to work "on-site" as COVID-19 vaccines and proof of administration was mandated by state governments across #Australia via Public Health Order.
Here is a sample of COVID-19 vaccine digital certificate (now outdated) issued by the Australian Government which will show all the necessary details including the brand of the COVID-19 vaccine, date of vaccination and number of doses.
Fast forward 2023, in the state of Victoria in #Australia , legislation has been passed which directs employers that they must destroy COVID-19 vaccination information recorded or held before 13 August 2023.
Government of New South Wales (NSW), #Australia has advised that people no longer can add COVID-19 vaccination certificate to the Service NSW app.
Last month, Dept. of Health #Australia advised that people can use the new COVID-19 and Influenza Immunisation History Statement (IHS) for employment purposes which will only display COVID-19 and influenza vaccination information.
Why is this happening?
It is all got to do with Individual Healthcare Identifiers (IHI) which is available on all COVID-19 digital certificates and Immunisation History Statements prior to 3 December 2022 and it is a BIG problem.
An IHI is deemed to be personal information under the HI Act and the Privacy Act. In the context of inclusion in a COVID-19 digital certificate, an IHI is also considered to be sensitive health information under the Privacy Act.
And perhaps for this reason, Office of Australian Information Commissioner has advised that COVID-19 digital certificates or Immunisation History Statements generated or updated AFTER 3 December 2022 will not contain an IHI.
This "may be" the reason why NSW health told the NCAT tribunal that they do not retain the data for the COVID vaccination reports which .@Jikkyleaks showed is NOT true.
Perhaps they know that they should not be querying the AIR.
Australian government (Federal and state) so blind with their tyrannical approach to implement COVID-19 policies and vaccine mandates may have broken laws which may have put thousands of entities (businesses and organizations) in the line of lawsuits (Breach of privacy).
Recently published TGA #Australia FOI 4251 shows causality assessment outcomes for deaths assessed by the TGA as likely to be linked to COVID-19 vaccination.
ATAGI #Australia advised today:-
A bivalent vaccine (one dose) is preferred over original vaccines (2 doses) for primary vaccination.
Also:-
"While there are currently no efficacy or effectiveness studies of bivalent vaccines when used for the primary vaccination course"
🤡👉🏽🌏
And perhaps a subtle admission that natural immunity exist 🤔
"....in the context of widespread community transmission in #Australia which suggests that most previously unvaccinated recipients will have some pre-existing immunity from prior infection."
TGA has finally published (8 May 2023), almost after an year, documentations on death of a 5 year old (M), 7 year old (M) and a 9 year old (F) following #Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.
TGA #Australia has announced today (3 May 2023), that from 1 June 2023, prescribing of oral #Ivermectin for ‘off-label’ uses will no longer be limited to specialists such as dermatologists, gastroenterologists and infectious diseases specialists.
Excerpt from the document (Notice of final decision) shows how and why it is still considered that #Ivermectin is not a useful prophylaxis/medicine for COVID-19 and instead COVID-19 vaccines and treatments should be preferred.
Note that Pharmacy Guild of #Australia wrote to the panel and advised AGAINST removing the Appendix D entry because they think that if #Ivermectin is available, people may choose not to get vaccinated.
On 20th April 2021, #Pfizer requested waiver for summary of drug utilization rate because data on drug utilization rates in females of reproductive potential was not available for BNT162b2 (mRNA).
Neither Pfizer nor BioNTech compiled data on DUR
among females of reproductive potential because no clinical evidence existed at any point throughout clinical development to indicate that vaccination posed any elevated risk to women of this group.
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) stated that based on current knowledge (animal tests), COVID-19 vaccines unlikely posed a risk to the pregnant women or the fetus because authorized COVID-19 vaccines are non-replicating vaccines.
A 🧵on recent #Pfizer documents published early April 2023.
#pfizer searched their safety database for all BNT162b2 vaccine cases reporting any exposure to
vaccine during pregnancy or exposure to baby via lactation from all time through 28 February 2021.
673 cases identified.
Out of 673 identified cases:-
- 458 involved BNT162b2 exposure during
pregnancy (mother/fetus)