These researchers designed a spike protein with point mutations which eliminate the ERΞ± binding, improving AE outcomes in the vaxxed.
(Because improvements are urgently needed in a π with "extremely rare effects" in a "minority" of patients.)π #ShibbolethsOfTheDamned >
>
They link to this prior work. >
>
Which brings up the cancer question.
This study on women with #BreastCancer showed they have higher rates of severe COVID and death than those without it.
Logical, since they are immune compromised.
However, women on Anti Estrogen Therapy (AET) >
i.e. recipients of Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMS) had lower rates of SARS2.
The scientists suggest SERMS to treat COVID.
Since the spike protein π¦ π is proven to bind ERΞ±, activate signaling, and increase coagulopathy,
is it also having an oncogenic effect? >
The SARS2 spike protein forms amyloid fibrin micro clots. #MicroClots are a biomarker in Acute and Long COVID. They are also a biomarker for #cancer.
This is a paper on the 1918 influenza pandemic and UVB light which has some interesting implications for COVID, SARS2 π¦ and COVID π.
The H1N1 virus allowed for bacterial colonization and pneumonia. (*bacteria + π·π§΅) >
Fauci et al. conclude that most of the deaths in the Spanish Flu were from the secondary bacterial pneumonia. > pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18680641/
This is known as the "Sequential Infection Hypothesis" a better paper, and more detailed and elaborate explanation by Brundage and Shanks: > wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/14β¦