Interesting that Ford found $4.4 Billion for healthcare, details here:
#Ontario Health Sector: 2023 Budget Spending Plan Review
This report reviews the Province’s health sector spending plan in the 2023 Ontario Budget and the /1
/2
2023-24 Expenditure Estimates. Health sector spending includes the combined spending by the Ministries of Health and Long-Term Care.
Health Sector Spending Outlook
Based on the FAO’s estimate of the cost of current health sector programs and announced commitments,
/3 the FAO projects that health sector spending will grow at an average annual rate of 3.4 per cent between 2021-22 and 2025-26, reaching $86.7 billion in 2025-26.
In comparison, the funding allocated by the Province in the 2023 Ontario Budget grows at a higher average
/4 annual rate of 3.7 per cent, reaching $87.6 billion by 2025-26.Overall, the FAO estimates that the
***Province has allocated a total of $4.4 billion more than what is necessary to fund existing programs and announced commitments from 2022-23 to 2025-26.
/5 This $4.4 billion in excess funds consists of $1.3 billion in 2022-23, $0.4 billion in 2023-24, $1.8 billion in 2024-25 and $0.9 billion in 2025-26.
What Has Changed Since the FAO’s Last Outlook?
The FAO’s estimate that the Province has allocated $4.4 billion in excess
/6 funds between 2022-23 and 2025-26 is a significant change from the FAO’s previous estimate of a $10.0 billion funding shortfall over the same period.
***This reversal is due to $15.2 billion in new funding added to the Province’s health sector spending plan in the 2023
/7 Ontario Budget.
Of the $15.2 billion in new health sector funding added in the 2023 budget, the FAO estimates that:$9.4 billion is required to address the funding shortfall for existing programs and announced commitments; $0.9 billion is for higher compensation
/8 spending resulting from retroactive wage increases awarded to some health sector workers that were subject to wage restraint under Bill 124; $0.5 billion is required to fund new program changes; and $4.4 billion is excess funds that are not required to fund health sector
List of bills brought forward by the CPC to ban or restrict Abortion rights for women in Canada the list is long:
M-37 June 2, 1987
Gus Mitges, PC MP Motion to amend Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to include “unborn persons.” Defeated 89-62. /1
/2 M-268 Nov. 20, 1997 Garry Breitkreuz, Reform MP Reintroduction of Motion calling for binding national referendum on government funding for “medically unnecessary” abortions. (M-91)
/3 C-461 Dec. 2, 1998 Maurice Vellacott, Reform MP Bill to prohibit healthcare providers from being forced to participate against their will in procedures such as abortion or euthanasia. (Similar to Haidasz’s conscience clause Bill S-7, 1997).
/2 Budget 2022 pledged sums to prevent & tackle forest fires, emergency prevention preparedness - $315,000,000 for the country - buy specialized fire fighting equipment, train new fire fighters and incorporate Indigenous Traditional Knowledge in our Fire Management Systems.
/3 Thus far, the Federal Government has contributed to 6 Provinces and Territories to acquire fire fighting equipment, vehicles, mobile units, avionics, hoses, pumps and enhanced communications equipment.
For years under Harper people complained of the cuts in funding, services, infrastructure, social programs etc.
We then vote in a new Party - Liberal Federal Government and they reverse a lot of the shameful policies and laws that hurt workers, veterans, women, children, /1
/2 seniors, and money is now used to fund these programs and services again, funding is now going to infrastructure and many new businesses, jobs have increased dramatically under PMJT. He has one of the lowest unemployment levels in 40 years. The economy is booming
/3 and the GDP is doing well, triple AAA credit rating, we don't have enough workers out there, but more and more people are entering the workforce, especially women, who can now afford to work due to the $10 a day child care National program. His policies are working and he has
Before delving into the potential reasons behind Poilievre’s avoidance of the vetting process, it is crucial to recognize the importance of national security clearance for political leaders, especially the Prime Minister. As the head of government, /1
/2 the Prime Minister is privy to confidential information concerning intelligence, defence matters, and international relations. Access to classified data enables effective decision-making in critical areas such as military operations, counterintelligence, and national
/3 security policy formulation. Without undergoing the necessary vetting process and obtaining top-secret security clearance, Poilievre’s ability to lead the country and make informed decisions in these vital domains would be severely compromised.
Foreign interference: Johnston recommends public hearings |
Johnston advised that a public inquiry on classified information is not feasible. ctvnews.ca/politics/no-pu…
/2 Johnston said that, while the threat of foreign interference is real and Ottawa should address it, he found much of the media reporting on the issue was "misconstrued" and devoid of context after he reviewed the relevant intelligence.
Johnston was particularly critical of the
/3 person or people behind the national security leaks.
"Any responsible intelligence professional knows how destructive and dangerous leaks can be," Johnston said. "It is a matter of urgency that all efforts be made to identify and hold the leaker(s) responsible. Malice cannot