We have cause to be grateful to #Sunak, yes grateful. For he has done what no one else, not #Boris' friends, allies or supporters, could.
He has finally woken the sleeping giant.
1/cont.
#Sunak has been a very silly boy. Even after everything #Sunak did to him, #Boris was content to sit quietly in the backbenches as a loyal #Conservative. But tonight, there was a turning point, the letter to the Privileges Committee. Finally #Boris had had enough.
2/cont
The trigger was the Honours List, what #Boris might well have seen as closure: recognition of those who had been loyal to him and good servants to the nation. But all #Sunak could do was see #Boris in the light of his own behaviour and personality.
3/cont.
So #Sunak decided that #Boris needed to be cast into outer political darkness. And #Sunak decided to wreak his spite on those #Boris had nominated, using weasel words and his proxy #Forsyth to carry out this despicable act.
4/cont.
The weasel words and evident lies enraged #Boris as it did #Dorries & #Adams. #Sunak used the disconnect between the Fixed Term Parliament Act & the notice period MPs serve when being vetted for ennoblement, to allow a 'lapse'.
5/ cont.
MPs must relinquish their seats to take up a seat in the Lords and the set period of time for this did not fit with the disruption to the GE schedule as both #Boris & #Truss did not serve the full term - due to #Sunak.
6/ cont.
#Sunak must have known that #Forsyth had removed names from the list but sat on this knowledge. #Boris was trying to be helpful to him, to avoid by-elections, by the formality of renewing the vetting so the MPs didn't have to resign until a GE date was clear.
7/ cont.
#Sunak's attempt to finesse having backfired & his lies becoming evident through his own words, #Sunak then had 3 unnecessary by-elections to deal with as #Dorries, #Adams & #Boris then resigned.
8/ cont.
#Dorries & Adams had no alternative. Under Parliamentary rules MPs can't resign on a whim, yet to take up their seats in the Lords, they cannot remain in the Commons. Simples. This was what #Boris tried to avoid, as a loyal #Conservative.
9/ cont.
The next cut was the Kangaroo Court findings, where #Boris had been led to expect politburo levels of justice where he was to be found guilty of nothing and banned from Parliament for a period which meant he would have to resign his seat.
10/ cont.
Again this was following the rules. That was bad e
nough, but the news that #Sunak was going to thro him to the wolves, i.e. the Privileges Committee, even to the extent of collaborating with #Labour to see him permanently banned, was the final straw.
11/ cont.
This explains the letter #Boris' lawyers submitted to the Committee at midnight last night. Unusual yes?
His letter told the kangaroos to publish or 'be damned' promising further comments once they did.
12/ cont.
The continuing harassment by enemies in his own Party - #Sunak & co - & their allies - #Starmer & #Labour, to say nothing of the #blob, finally aroused his ire. #Sunak's obvious intent to enable the #blob to banish #Boris from the House for life, lit the fuse.
13/ cont.
#Sunak could have avoided this: #Boris was planning to play the 'white man' & hitherto showed no sign of the petty vindictiveness so characteristic of #Sunak. The little Chancellor has finally done something we could not do.
#Boris had good reason perhaps for sitting back and letting politics get on without him - new baby, new family, the need to pay the bills..... He had shown no sign of wanting to pick up political cudgels despite everything.
15/ cont.
So, when this is all over, perhaps #Sunak will realise that he had "awoken a sleeping giant and filled him with a terrible resolve."
#Boris is angry, very angry & #Sunak & others will rue the day. #Boris is now motivated.
"Hasta la vista, baby!"
14/ cont.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#Conservative MPs & peers hoping for their Party's fortunes to be rescued by continuing to cling to #Sunak, or for personal favours from #Sunak, really need to reacquaint themselves with the tale of the frog & the scorpion. 1/ cont.
As we know, the frog offers the scorpion a lift over a raging river. The scorpion accepts, but half way across, stings the frog, dooming both in the process.
The scorpion cannot help but be himself.
2/ cont.
So it is with #Sunak. He is unable to behave any differently to that which is his inner nature: to sting (fatally) anyone who uncovers that truth by lifting the rock he hides under. We've had him all wrong: he's not a snake, he's a scorpion.
Kwasi #Kwarteng would not have realised, when he first announced his intention to be a tax-cutting, pro-growth, fiscally-responsible #Chancellor that he had immediately set in motion the daggers that would be thrust in his back 38 days later.
/1
The Bank of England, guardian of the nation’s wealth and cornerstone of its economic management originally started life as a private company, funded by subscription under Royal Charter in 1694, as a means to finance the public purse, depleted by various wars.
/2
No, I & millions of others are not happy about paying for your mistakes #Sunak!
cont.
Not happy because #Sunak is choosing the worst possible route forward, increasing taxation on those who have the least income to spare - remembering the truly rich do not pay income tax... he would know that, wouldn't he!
cont.
#Sunak, Prime M0R0N is going to maintain size of public sector but cut their budget - some same useless resources for even less useless work.
CONT.
#Sunak, Prime M0R0N is going raise taxes, hindering growth, choking business, meaning less money in the economy & raising less revenue for government.
CONT.
#Sunak, Prime M0R0N has shortfall in taxation revenue to fill his black hole; so there will be further increases in taxation as the UK spirals into #recession, a vicious downward spiral heading ultimately to stagflation! CONT.
@GuidoFawkes 1. Why was the Minister of State for the Home Office, a department responsible for national security, not herself aware of the #cybersecurity risks which attend e-mails. 2. Why was #Braverman not #briefed accordingly upon taking up the role? Or if she was, why take the risk?
3. Why would she even think asking someone to delete an email was sensible? Any business person would know that:
a) they are virtually impossible to retrieve ad hoc: &
b) this violates the electronic record.