Read on Twitter
@BonitaZarrillo, @TracyGrayKLC &
@LouiseChabotBQ..
Please #RatifyC22 the way in which #SOCI provided it and close the book on this chapter.
The insurance industry will NOT challenge the amendment, they didn't when it was used in the other case in the last 27 years. 1/
@LouiseChabotBQ..
Please #RatifyC22 the way in which #SOCI provided it and close the book on this chapter.
The insurance industry will NOT challenge the amendment, they didn't when it was used in the other case in the last 27 years. 1/
Even if they did for some reason think they could win and did decide to challenge it, the amendment is constitutional. It does not encroach on provincial jurisdiction because this IS a federal benefit.
The federal government has the equal right to provide a supplement 2/
The federal government has the equal right to provide a supplement 2/
The Amendment, ONLY affects the treatment of the Federal Benefit (C-22) and does not encroach on their ability to gouge people from all the other ways they already do.
Furthermore, we signed all parts of the CRPD.
The CRPD clearly states that a federal body signing on 3/
Furthermore, we signed all parts of the CRPD.
The CRPD clearly states that a federal body signing on 3/
signs with full authority of the nation and that any laws, rules or regulations which conflict with the articles of the CRPD, are to be changed & eliminated. Striking the amendment, would be a violation of our obligations to follow the #CRPD. urgent @SR_Disability @LavJacobs 4/4
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
