THE RAJPUTANA EMPIRE Profile picture
Jun 17, 2023 13 tweets 9 min read Read on X
Mega #thread 🧵 on Maharani #Padmavati : debunking all the lies spread on Queen Padmavati and proof of her historicity with conclusive sources 1/11 ⬇️🔆🔅
[[[Tag her @tishasaroyan in this thread because she have blocked me 😁😏 ]]] Image
At the time of Rawal Ratan Singh (1303 AD), there was no fort or area named Kumbhalner (Kumbhalgarh) and no king named Devpal. Rather, Malik Muhammad Jayasi had wrongly imagined this in Padmavat. Kumbhalner was built by Rana Kumbha (1440-1450). Before that it did not exist 2/11 Image
Jauhar was a practice of mass self-immolation by Rajput women, their children, and retainers to avoid capture, enslavement and rape by an invading army. Because the contemporary sources of the Turks themselves say that after winning they used to take women as slaves. 3/11 Image
Padmavat story was not originated by Jayasi (1540 AD), but 14 years before that, in 1526, this story is found in a book called Chittai Charitt (Chittor Charit), and after Jayasi in 1589 AD, this incident exist in Gora Badal Katha of Hemartan. Which are different from Jayasi. 4/11 Image
A historical character named Rawal Ratan Singh is found in the Padmavat story,now his inscription of 1303 AD from Chittor has been found, which clearly proves his historicity. Now the husband of Padmavati himself is a historical character. So why can't it be Padmavati? 5/11 Image
Many historians imagine that there is no description of Padmini in Amir Khusro's book, so perhaps this imagination is their mistake, Khusro has described Padmini in another sense, which has been certified by historians Irfan Habib, Dashrath Sharma and KL Srivastava. 6/11 Image
Both Abul Fazal and Farishta were Muslim historians who wrote against the Rajputs. But still he has proved the historicity of Padmavati by describing it. Now Abul Fazl and Farishta are the main historians of the people who consider Padmavati as a fiction. 7/11 Image
Other characters in the story of Padmavati were Gora Badal and Raghav Chetan, their historicity is proved by the Kumbhalgarh inscription of 1460 AD, & Khatargachh Pattavali of 1310-20 AD. Now if both these characters were historical, then how can Padmavati be fictional. 8/11 Image
Padmavati's birth is said to be Singauli and Pugal (Jaisalmer) region according to medieval sources, only Jayasi imagined and wrote Sri Lanka. Hemratan and other sources do not have such description. These sources are fully deferent from jayasi's imagination. 9/11 Image
Therefore, it is concluded that Padmavati was not a fictional character but a historical character, because most of the inscriptions of Mewar did not have the names of queens or women. Ex. Meerabai and Panna Dhai, who are historical characters even if they are not mentioned.10/11 Image
This is what we would like to say this woman @tishasaroyan who spoke wrongly on Rajputs and Jauhar- 🤡First go and do your PhD studies properly with contemporary and best historical sources, Not from the books written by your own propagandist xyz historians of JNU. 11/11 ImageImage
@threadreaderapp kindly unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with THE RAJPUTANA EMPIRE

THE RAJPUTANA EMPIRE Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Factual_history

Nov 12, 2023
Super #Thread 🧵 :- #अहीर जाति के #शूद्र व मलेच्छ होने के प्रमाण ✴️ व इनके #यदुवंशी होने का खंडन..( open and scroll Down)⬇️ 1/15

[ अहीर शब्द संस्कृत भाषा के आभीर शब्द से मिलकर बना है ]
महाभारत के वन पर्व के अनुसार ये आभीर एक मलेच्छ जाति है जिसका यदुवंशीयो से कोई संबंध नहीं है Image
मत्स्य पुराण (भाग-1,अध्याय 50 ,श्लोक 76) के अनुसार आभीरों का Origin मलेच्छ वर्ण से है जिन्होंने छल से शासन किया था, यह श्लोक महाभारत में वर्णित आभीरों का मलेच्छ(अनार्य/ शूद्र जनजाति) होना प्रमाणित करता है 2/15 Image
महाकवि अमरसिंह द्वारा रचित अमरकोश में आभीरों/अहीरों को साफ साफ महाशूद्र बोला गया है जिसकी पुष्टि अमरकोश के दक्षिण संस्करण से भी हुई है. महाशूद्र और मलेच्छ दोनों एक ही शब्द है जो वर्ण व्यवस्था से बाहर की जातियों को प्रदर्शित करते है . 3/15 Image
Read 19 tweets
Jun 10, 2023
Mega #Thread 🧵 on Gujar origin :
"Illegitimation and origin of gujar caste "
With their own bards and authentic sources..⏬⏬
[आईये जानते है कौन है मुगलपूत, दासीपुत,र* डी पूत] 1/14
@GurjarBoysPage
@VeerGurjar_in @himmatsinghgur1 @Gurjaratra @rajkumarbhatisp Image
गूजर शब्द का अर्थ - गौ(🐄)+ चर = यानि गाय को चराने वाला पशुपालक समुदाय, इनका स्थानवाचक गुर्जर शब्द से कोई लेना देना नहीं है.2/14 Image
गूजर शब्द के अन्य अर्थ व इनकी रक्त शुद्धता:
Source: Historical and statistical memoir of zila bulandshahar by ls kaur ( verified by gov. of india) 3/14 Image
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(