๐จ EXCL: The UK Govt are co-funding technical assistance & continued development of Ukraine's controversial Diia app through the Eurasia Foundation & its 'Transparency and Accountability in Public Administration and Services' (TAPAS).
TAPAS or 'Transparency & Accountability in Public Administration & Services', is a seven-year, $43 million 'anti-corruption activity' in #Ukraine funded by USAID & UK Aid (2016-2024).
Diia (ะัั) meaning 'action' or ะะตัะถะฐะฒะฐ ั ะฏ (State & Me) was first presented in 2019 & officially launched in early 2020.
Most of its now 130 e-gov services were developed from UK & USAID through the Eurasia Foundation who are also recipients of funding from George Soros' OSF.
Throughout #COVID19 & the ongoing conflict with #Russia, Diia has been mired in controversy.
Former US Ambassador to the UN & now Administrator of USAID, Samantha Power, announced at a glitzy event in DC on May 31st that "countries around the world will soon follow Diiaโs lead".
Visa executive chair Al Kelly explaining how his company supported the Diia app incentivising Ukrainians to receive COVID jabs which also provided other targeted payments providing one had a โGreen Passโ โ
Diia is a full on state-snitching app for its citizens:
"e-Enemy. A chatbot that helps any citizen safely transfer info on the location of Russian troops, names of collaborators..."
In October 2022, a hacker in the now closed 'Breached Forums' claimed to have compromised an undisclosed amount of sensitive data from Diia, containing the email, name, DOB, address & passport numbers of citizens.
Diia continues to be hailed as a model in e-governance with USAID leading the drive to implement 'Diia-like' schemes elsewhere & to 'develop a one-stop-shop app for government services.'
The question is, do you really want something like Diia in your country? We hope not.
๐งตReform of the NI Public Health Act [1967] towards a new Public Health Bill requires intense scrutiny before any proposals could be progressed.
But for some at the DoH, the thirst for power since COVID-19 is insatiable. Very concerning.
1. An 'all hazards' approach with permanent powers is simply too broad in scope & would highly likely interfere with fundamental rights.
2. There's no imperative or strict legal duty with WHO agreements to amend such legislation. The UK interpret these as 'recommendations'.
[contd.] 3. Human Rights Act [HRA] legislation wasn't respected throughout 2020-22 with the Coronavirus Act [2020] as these rights can be arbitrarily suspended.
'Foundry' is the name of the data integration & analytics platform set to be used by the NHS as part of its Federated Data Plaform (FDP) which has sparked numerous privacy concerns around the handling of patient data.
(contd.)
Last year we looked at an example of the licensing Terms & Conditions of a Palantir contract circa. 2020.
๐ฅ What is the 'other data' that Palantir may collect with Foundry? A very broad & unclear term.
๐ฅ Where's it stored & does it leave the country where processing occurs.
๐ฅ Will patient data leave the United Kingdom & be processed elsewhere like the #EU or 'other locations'.
๐ฅ Where are these 'other locations'.
๐ฅ Which 'third party' is involved in the 'datacentre security standards'.
America have stopped printing #COVID19 vaccination records which could used for international travel.
The #NHS still have a COVID-Pass available until 31st March 2024 even though there's SEVEN countries left in the world with entry measures.
Here's the list of countries where @SteveBarclay @DHSCgovuk @UKHSA still think it's necessary & proportionate to continue wasting UK tax payers money on this useless scheme.
It's a joke.
CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC
LIBYA
NAURU
NORTH KOREA
PITCAIRN ISLANDS
SOUTH SUDAN
TURKMENISTAN
Since the WHO ended the #COVID19 PHEIC on 5th May, there's been a major de-escalation of remaining countries enforcing COVID entry measures.
You can even travel to #China & #NorthKorea unhindered, except NK will quarantine visitors for 30 days according to their guidelines.
๐งตThe Crime & Policing MP @CPhilpOfficial may view the integration & amalgamation of multiple national databases using AI to tackle crime as a 'gamechanger'.
But there are serious risks for the data & privacy of everyday citizens. We explain more in this thread ๐
๐ฅ Cybersecurity: Criminals may attempt to exploit vulnerabilities in the systems used to integrate & store data.
Hacking, malware, or ransomware attacks, could compromise the integrity & availability of data.
๐ฅ Data Breaches: Combining multiple databases may increase the risk of data breaches.
Unauthorized access could allow criminals & other malicious actors to a wealth of sensitive data.
An 'anonymous IT reporter' who claims to have spent a lot of time petitioning against COVID-Passes & raised this on TalkRadio 'thinks' national ID cards are a 'bad idea' but their modern equivalent is OK.
Zero mention of the #OnlineSafetyBill, implications on encryption, & amendments to the Snoopers Charter which could see companies like Apple having to run their latest security/privacy updates by the State & at the risk of the public not knowing about it.
Modern digital identity systems don't necessarily mean 'more safe', even if open source.
For example, #WorldCoin runs a open source protocol which hasn't deterred criminals from stealing passwords & injecting malware into the iris-scanning devices: