Official and unofficial US-Iran back channel diplomacy since the Damascus strike on April 1 helped to prevent this crisis from spiraling out of control.
Consistent messaging across multiple channels clarified each side’s thinking, spelling out intentions and redlines. 1/
Early on the US made clear that it was not involved in the strike. Iran informed the US that retaliatory measures were inevitable, relaying the nature and scope of the response over time. 2/
While urging restraint, a clear redline for the US was no targeting of US forces or facilities. For Iran, a redline was no direct US involvement in any response by Israel. Biden telling Netanyahu the US will not participate in any offensive operations against Iran is notable. 3/
Both sides communicated they are not seeking a direct conflict or a wider regional war -- a consistent message since Oct 7. Both continue to stress reducing tensions while signaling an interest in resuming de-escalation efforts initiated after the Tower 22 incident in Jordan. 4/
There are some parallels to Iran’s response to the killing of Soleimani. A catastrophic escalation has now been avoided twice -- at least for now in the case of this latest episode. We might not be so lucky next time. 5/5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ I've been asked how the North Koreans might be viewing the Suleimani assassination and what are the potential impacts on negotiations with the US.
Here are some thoughts.
2/ The killing of Suleimani might make Pyongyang think twice about crossing a red line w/ Trump (i.e. breaking the moratorium on testing) - perhaps it was meant to have such an impact. But this event won’t compel the North Koreans to return to the negotiating table anytime soon.
3/ What it will do is reinforce the North Koreans' belief that the US is an existential threat to regime survival & the nuclear program is the only reliable means to deter US aggression. They'll begin to cite the Suleimani episode as a cautionary tale, alongside Gadhafi & Saddam.
Thread: Some thoughts on Kim Jong Un’s Party Plenum remarks.
Kim appears to be adjusting course on the “everything for the economy” strategic direction he unveiled in early 2018, which ushered in a new policy of engagement with the US.
Citing "the double-dealing behavior of the brigandish US" (yes, I had to google “brigandish” like I had to with “dotard”), Kim seems to be returning to a version of the “Byungjin” line, which places a parallel emphasis on the nuclear program and the economy.
Kim relayed a readiness to live with sanctions, getting by w/ belt-tightening & a more self-reliant economy while developing “strategic weapons.” The NKs likely expect the solidarity on sanctions relief expressed by China & Russia will lead to leakier sanctions enforcement.
Kim Jong Un returned to Pyongyang empty-handed and in a perceived weaker position. Choe reverses that script and places Kim, not Trump, in the driver’s seat for determining whether the talks will continue.
Choe rejected the “big deal” approach frontloading denuclearization before sanctions are eased put forward by Trump in Hanoi -- and later reiterated by Pompeo, Bolton and then Biegun at @CarnegieEndow’s nuclear conference -- calling it an “absurd sophism.”
The #Iran "plan B strategy" outlined by Pompeo today appears to be an attempt to take the “maximum pressure” approach used against #NorthKorea and apply it to Tehran. There are a number of problems with this thinking, but two big ones stand out. 1/ facebook.com/heritagefounda…
First, the Trump admin believes sanctions & military threats brought #NorthKorea back to negotiations. Both were factors in Pyongyang’s decision making, but they were not decisive on their own. The advances in the DPRK’s nuclear & missile programs were the decisive factors. 2/
Second, the approach put forward by Pompeo will require broad cooperation from allies and partners in order to work. The problem is that by violating the #IranDeal, the Trump administration has shattered the hard-won unity we once shared with our allies toward Iran. 3/
By placing the US in violation of the #IranDeal, Trump is undermining negotiations w/ North Korea before they even begin. With this move, he sends the message that even if you fulfill commitments & don't cheat, you still can't rely on the US to live up to its end of an agreement.
Trump should point to the #IranDeal’s intrusive inspections & extensive access by the IAEA as a model for any agreement w/ North Korea. These unprecedented verification provisions are innovations to emulate. Instead, he has dealt a significant blow to nuclear verification.
Trump doesn’t seem to understand or simply doesn’t care to understand how difficult it has been to build and sustain a coordinated approach to address Iran’s nuclear program. Instead, he’s keen to blow up years’ worth of diplomacy without offering a viable alternative.