When you read about homelessness in #GrantsPass, #Oregon, remember one thing. For more than half a century, the city has adopted, enforced, and defended laws that push people into homelessness.
Consider just one of them...🧵/1
For decades, Grants Pass has imposed off-street parking mandates. Since at least 1961, researchers have warned that these regulations limit the supply of housing and drive up its cost. The city adopted them anyway. /2
In its quest to ensure ample free parking at every destination, Grants Pass mandated parking for every conceivable land-use, including a minimum of 1 space per five inmates at a prison and 6 spaces “per line” at a bowling alley. (Huh?) /3
Grants Pass also required 1 space for “every seven foot of bench length, or every 28 sq.ft. where no permanent seats or benches are maintained in assembly areas” at a church.
A parking space requires ~350 sf of asphalt, so that's ~12.5 sf of parking for every 1 sf of church. /4
Because Grants Pass forced landowners to devote so much of their land to housing cars, it had little space left to house people. In Grants Pass today, pastors have plentiful parking, but their parishioners often sleep in cars. /5
Over the decades since Grants Pass first adopted minimum parking regulations, research showing that these mandates increase rents and home prices kept piling up. /6
University of California scholars Jia & Wachs found that in #SanFrancisco, the average condominium with off-street parking sells for 13% more than the price of comparable units without parking. /7
In a study using a nationwide data set, University of California researchers @CJGabbe & @gregspierce found that forcing builders to provide a single garage space “adds about 17% to a unit’s rent”. /8
For many, a 17% rent increase is the difference between a roof over your family’s head and an eviction notice. /9
Grants Pass responded to this research by ignoring it. Unsurprisingly, rents rose. Homelessness increased. Neighbors complained. Elected officials responded. They could have responded by removing laws that worsen homelessness. Instead, they criminalized it. /10
In 2022, the state of Oregon finally took action to alleviate high rents, high home prices and homelessness. The state adopted a new rule that requires local jurisdictions to remove or sharply reduce minimum parking mandates. /11
If cities complied by removing minimum parking regulations, individuals would once again be able to decide for themselves how much parking they did or didn’t need. They’d be able to add a backyard cottage for grandma, without paving half their yard. /12
Grants Pass officials weren’t willing to let families have that much freedom. Despite worsening homelessness, they continued their quest to ensure ample free parking at every destination. Seeking to maintain minimum parking mandates, they sued. /13
They lost. The city’s lawsuit succeeded in squandering taxpayer dollars, but failed to convince the Oregon Court of Appeals, which found the city’s “broad statements” unpersuasive. It's hard to defend the indefensible.
What will happen next? Expect two things. First, more homes will spring to life. The evidence from cities that have already removed minimum parking mandates, like #Portland, OR, makes that clear.
Across Oregon, including in Grants Pass, families will add lots of cottages without a lot of new pavement. More people will have homes, fewer will live in tents.
Life will get better. /17
Second, planners & politicians in Grants Pass will, over time, learn how to manage on-street parking, using permits and prices, to keep it readily available.
Eventually, they will adopt those solutions. Fears of an unbearable parking shortage will fade. The sky won’t fall. /18
As @DonaldShoup writes, “Cities that require off-street parking and limit the housing supply have well-housed cars and homeless people. Ironically, by increasing the cost of housing, parking requirements force some people to live in their cars.” /19
That’s where Grants Pass is today: a city with well-housed cars & homeless people. Thanks to parking reform, that’s not its future.
It doesn’t have to be your town’s future, either. Go ahead, repeal minimum parking mandates. Don't become nationally known for homelessness. 20/20
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Owners of even the cheapest fleabag motels know they must keep track of how many rooms they have & whether they are empty or full.
But today, the year’s busiest shopping day, most retail areas won’t be tracking how many parking spots they have & whether they are empty or full.🧵
This helps explain why so many cities have ill-advised parking policies that frustrate customers, damage economies, waste taxpayer dollars, worsen traffic jams, and, all too often, end with motorists brawling over parking spots.
Let me suggest a few solutions. /2
When I lead studies of retail districts, like downtown #VenturaCA, business owners, managers, planners, & politicians often tell me that their shopping area has a “parking problem”. They’re usually right. But what is the nature of that problem? /3
Maybe 'cuz if it “eliminated a system in which forests’ worth of papers are pushed from one desk to the next, it would’ve ruined the cottage industry of connected permit expediters who...always manage to get their folders placed on the top of the pile”/3 missionlocal.org/2021/02/san-fr…
For centuries, Americans built compact, walkable, neighborhoods. They provide affordable shelter & let us meet many daily needs without getting in a car. They're a great American tradition
Today, we took a big step toward making that tradition legal again qz.com/2052284/califo…
Here’s a traditional fourplex at 203 Bryant St, #PaloAlto. It’s on a 5000 sf lot. That’s 35 homes per net residential acre. At that level of compactness, people walk a lot more & drive a lot less.
This is the kind of traditional American housing that #SB9 will make legal again.
As the @SierraClub’s John Holtzclaw explains, “This study suggests the following actions to reduce our dependence on the automobile, afford us more transportation options, reduce congestion buildup and reduce air pollution:…”
Imposing minimum parking mandates on commercial land uses near transit makes housing scarce and expensive.
If you have difficulty envisioning why, try adding homes near this #Milpitas light rail station. See all this underused asphalt? It’s all required by law.
Here's what a #Milpitas light right station area looks like on the ground.
To get here, take the #VTA light rail line to the Alder stop. Then, trudge north through a sea of parking.
#Milpitas could instead manage curb parking near the station, using prices and permits, and remove its costly minimum parking regulations. Many cities have already done this.
“As the leader of one of the state’s largest parking authorities, Park #NewHaven, I’ve come to learn a lot about parking. Our business model rests on the notion that parking is better when shared & the cost of parking should be borne by people who want to drive.”
A good policy.
“Zoning laws have the opposite result. They impose the cost of parking on nondrivers — and on all of us. Zoning mandates on parking make the cost of construction — and housing — more expensive."
Under #Pasadena’s current code, “any addition to an existing residence…of over 150 square feet triggers a requirement to provide two covered spaces within a garage or carport.”
Left: addition legal!
Right: no asphalt, no addition...😢
Instead of managing the curb parking actually owned by the city, #Pasadena planners found it easier to force every homeowner spend tens of thousands of dollars pouring concrete & building garages.