“Look, my fellow Iranian countryman, Ayatollah Khamenei issued a fatwa stating that one should not insult the Sahabah. This is my proof that Shiism has undergone a process of Sunnification, and that modern Shiism prohibits insulting Aishah, etc.”

🤡🤡🤡

Let’s ignore the fact that zindiq Khamenei's own teacher, the kafir Khomeini, said that Aishah, may Allah be pleased with her, is more impure than dogs and pigs. Let’s also ignore that Khamenei is a politician whose Rafidi cult, according to Twelver reliable narrations, is based 90% on taqiyyah. Let’s disregard the numerous Ayatullats of our time, Shia clerics, and eulogists in Iran and Iraq, with millions of followers, who repeatedly insult Aishah and other Sahabah, as the entire Rafidi belief system is based on the widespread takfir of the Sahabah. They couldn't care less about Khamenei's political fatwa.

Now the real question is: why does Basijijou take Khamenei's words as if he were a reliable and honest scholar of Islam? Why does he overlook the substantial evidence proving that Khamenei’s fatwa is merely a public stunt to deceive Sunnis worldwide who are unaware of the reality in Iran? Why does he ignore the fact that Sunni Iranians have been exposing Khamenei’s hypocrisy and the deep-seated disdain for the Sahabah in Iran for decades?

At this point, he might as well engage in mud-bathing and self-flagellation like a Rafidi, for is there a humiliation greater than going out of one’s way to essentially defend one of the principal enemies of Ahl al-Sunnah, the Rafidah Majoos, all because some fighting groups in the Muslim world, under severe duress, are cooperating with them (and would even cooperate with Hindus if it helped them, as is permitted under duress). The taqiyyah-merchant zindiq Khamenei is a direct student of the pantheist pagan Khomeini, and Khamenei's job is literally to export Khomeini's ideology. When there was no internet or social media, Khomeini immortalised in his book what the Rafidah have believed for ages about the pure wife of the Prophet, peace be upon him:

"As for the remaining groups of Nasibis and even Khawarij, although their punishment is more severe than that of disbelievers, there is no evidence for their impurity (najasah). Therefore, if a ruler rebels against the Commander of the Faithful (peace be upon him), not as an act of religious devotion but rather due to opposition over sovereignty or for some other purpose—like Aishah, Zubayr, Talhah, Muawiyah, and others like them—or if a person harbours enmity toward him or one of the Imams, not as an act of faith but due to hostility toward the Quraysh, Bani Hashim, or Arabs, or because they killed his child or father, etc., apparently none of these reasons would cause them to be outwardly impure, EVEN THOUGH they are more vile than dogs and pigs."

Source: Kitab al-Taharah by Ayatollah Khomeini, vol. 3, p. 457

Keep in mind, these statements of kufr from Khomeini, are readily available throughout Iran, and no one has retracted these statements. Only when Sunnis in Iran exposed Khomeini’s works and his blasphemies to the Islamic and Arab world did Khamenei, years later, issue his taqiyyah fatwa—merely because his abhorrent Shia ideology was under growing scrutiny.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐚𝐟𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐡 (𝐒𝐡𝐢𝐚): 𝐀 𝐒𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐄𝐯𝐢𝐥 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐮𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐄𝐫𝐚

𝘈 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 700-𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳-𝘰𝘭𝘥 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘣𝘺 𝘢 𝘣𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘱 𝘸𝘩𝘰, 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦, 𝘩𝘢𝘥 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘢𝘭𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘐𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘔𝘶𝘴𝘭𝘪𝘮𝘴 𝘵𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘺, 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘺 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸𝘭𝘦𝘥𝘨𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘯𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘺. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘣𝘦 𝘧𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘺 𝘶𝘱𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘭𝘦, 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘣𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘚𝘩𝘢𝘺𝘬𝘩 𝘢𝘭-𝘐𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘮 𝘐𝘣𝘯 𝘛𝘢𝘺𝘮𝘪𝘺𝘺𝘢𝘩'𝘴 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘙𝘢𝘧𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘩, 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘩𝘪𝘴, 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘩𝘢'𝘈𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘩.

"And leave what is heard and transmitted from those who have passed. For every wise person should consider what is happening in their own time, and what is close to their time in terms of trials, evils, and corruption in Islam. They will find that much of it comes from the side of 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐚𝐟𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐡, 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐥𝐬, ceaselessly perpetrating trials, evils, and spreading corruption among the Ummah." (Minhaj al-Sunnah, vol. 6, p. 372 by Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah)

Arabic original:

وَدَعْ مَا يُسْمَعُ وَيُنْقَلُ عَمَّنْ خَلَا، فَلْيَنْظُرْ كُلُّ عَاقِلٍ فِيمَا يَحْدُثُ فِي زَمَانِهِ، وَمَا يَقْرُبُ مِنْ زَمَانِهِ مِنَ الْفِتَنِ وَالشُّرُورِ وَالْفَسَادِ فِي الْإِسْلَامِ، فَإِنَّهُ يَجِدُ مُعْظَمَ ذَلِكَ مِنْ قِبَلِ الرَّافِضَةِ، وَتَجِدُهُمْ مِنْ أَعْظَمِ النَّاسِ فِتَنًا وَشَرًّا، وَأَنَّهُمْ لَا يَقْعُدُونَ عَمَّا يُمْكِنُهُمْ مِنَ الْفِتَنِ وَالشَّرِّ وَإِيقَاعِ الْفَسَادِ بَيْنَ الْأُمَّةِ

(منهاج السنة النبوية لشيخ الإسلام بن تيمية - المجلد 6 - الصفحة 372) "The root of every turmoil and calamity are the Shia and those who align with them. Many of the swords unsheathed in Islam were indeed wielded by them. It is known that their origin and their essence are that of the hypocrites; they fabricate lies and concoct corrupt doctrines to corrupt the religion of Islam and deceive those who lack religious insight." (Minhaj al-Sunnah, vol. 6, p. 370 by Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah)

What they don't teach you about #JudeoChristian tradition and history

In the 16th century, Martin Luther's teachings led to the formation of Lutheranism, which became the predominant Protestant denomination in Germany 🇩🇪.

Luther's main works on the Jews were his 65,000-word treatise ‘Von den Juden und Ihren Lügen’ (On the Jews and Their Lies) and ‘Vom Schem Hamphoras und vom Geschlecht Christi’ (Of the Unknowable Name and the Generations of Christ) — reprinted five times within his lifetime — both written in 1543, three years before his death.
In his ‘On the Jews and Their Lies ’ Luther states that the Jews are a "base, whoring people, that is, no people of God, and their boast of lineage, circumcision, and law must be accounted as filth." They are full of the "devil's feces ... which they wallow in like swine." The synagogue was a "defiled bride, yes, an incorrigible whore and an evil slut ..."

Zoroastrianism is a highly idealized and whitewashed religion. Iranian ultra-nationalist Islamophobes have deceived entire generations of Iranians through a cunning romanticization of Zoroastrianism. It is time to expose this Majoosi cult for the vile paganism it is.

#majoos

https://twitter.com/Ashurbanip14937/status/1722174130223554974

EXPERT ON ZOROASTRIANISM CONFIRMS NEXT-OF-KIN (XWEDODAH) MARRIAGES IN ZOROASTRIAN IRAN

Nora Elisabeth Mary Boyce (2 August 1920 – 4 April 2006) was a British scholar of Iranian languages and an authority on Zoroastrianism. Boyce was anything but a fanatic or ‘Islamist’ who wanted to bad name Zoroastrianism and Pre-Islamic Persia. A quote from Wikipedia shows that if anything she did her utmost to clarify many misconceptions about Zoroastrianism:

In 1963–64, Boyce spent a research year among orthodox Zoroastrians of the 24 villages of Yazd, Iran. The results of her research there were formative to her understanding of Zoroastrianism and she discovered that much of the previously established scholarship on the ancient faith was terribly misguided. In 1975, Boyce presented the results of her research at her Ratanbai Katrak lecture series at Oxford University. In the same year she published the first volume of her magnum opus, The History of Zoroastrianism, which appeared in the monograph series Handbuch der Orientalistik (Leiden:Brill). Her Ratanbai Katrak lecture series were published in 1977 as A Persian Stronghold of Zoroastrianism.

Message to Bro Hajji:

In your first video about #tabarruk you stated how 'takfiri' 'Vahabi-Najdiyaa' are for regarding tabarruk as shirk. That's a lie about Atharis. So far you haven't provided a single statement by the Imam of the Najdi Da'wah i.e. Shaykh Abdil-Wahhab. Is it because he never made blanket takfir? in fact, he refutes and other Hanbali giants refute your allegations with which you have fooled the gullible.

Where did he make takfir? Why is your entire Vahabis-make -takfir-because-of-tabarruk argument based on a STRAW MAN?

A ruwaybidhah said: Imam Ahmad bin HUMBLE of 'Aale Sunnah wal-Jama'ah' allowed the kissing and touching of the grave of the Prophet (s), that is shirk according to you Najdiyaa!

Reply: no you jahil, false tabarruk is haram & bid'ah & can lead to shirk, it's not shirk fi dhatihi. Kissing graves, no matter which grace, is the Sunnah of the Jews, Yahood, Rawafid, and Sufiyyah, even according to Imam Ghazali.

THREAD 📜

The non-sugarcoated view of #Christianity on #Islam.

Pastor Kachelmeier about why the old Lutherans considered Islam a Christian (!) heresy (and not its own religion). Listen to the ignorance of these Trinitarian textbook polytheists and thank Allah for Tawhid. Other textbook pagans and idolaters like Orthodox Christians share similar views and claim Islam is an agnostic (!) heresy. The Islam-hating Syrian monk, priest, and apologist, John of Damascus (يوحنا الدمشقي) who died in 749 CE hated Islam and Muslims with passion.

Tawassul *is* part of Islam and whoever rejects it is a heretic.

However, what is rejected is pseudo-Tawassul of the Rafidi type.

SUNNI Tasawwuf *is* from Islam, who ever rejects it is basically rejecting the concept of Tazkiyyah al-Nafs, etc. i.e. integral parts of Islam.

https://twitter.com/KriegundFrieden/status/1362289087021912065

Atharis oppose Ghuluw and Batini Quburism in the name of 'loving the Ahlul-Bayt/Awliya', not normative and legit Tawassul. If the following is normative Islam, then I'm the prince of Persia:



This is pure Ghuluw of the Rafidi kind.

On all Iranian news. Kamal al-Haydari (may Allah guide him) has shaken the Hawzat of Shirk. He has proven that Imamism is based on:

1. The belief in Tahrif of the Qur'an by the Sahaba (R).
2. Takfir on ALL Sunnis (not just 'Wahhabis').

Shia Ayatullats have started a witching

https://twitter.com/torshaby/status/1322275577466859520

He's proven that Twelverism is the biggest Takfiri sect on earth and that it's hypocritical to refer to others ('Wahhabis') as Takfiris whilst the foundation of Imamism is based on Takfir against ALL non-Twelvers.

I've notice some pro #MBS accounts cheerleading for the filthy terrorist #MEK CULT (that has managed to mix Rafidi Imamism with Communism!). Have some shame, the MEK is the most hated Iranian opposition group, they represent no one. Your naive politicians are waisting money 🤦🏻‍♂️. I've got friends whose family members are from the #MEK. They are mostly godless people, mainly ethnic Persians, Hijab is only worn by their ultra brainwashed elite, and even that is done all in a communist fashion, like a uniform.

They are one of the worst heretics on earth.

Unknown to many: Mashad has a native ethnic Persian (Khorasani) Sunni community of around 15%. MANY towns outside of Mashad (like Khaf, Taybad, Torbat Jam etc.) are still *majority* Sunni (their remote land saved them from the Shia Safawi onslaught in the 16th century).

https://twitter.com/MuslimKhorasani/status/1292813940146282499

There are a few so-called backyard 'mosques' run by Sunnis in Mashad. A backyard mosque is a type of mosque without any traditional Islamic architecture. It has neither domes nor minarets.

Former Twelver Shia, Abdul-Malik al-Shafi'i:

https://twitter.com/EbnHussein1424/status/1263420797835763715?s=19

https://twitter.com/EbnHussein1424/status/1263990666952093696?s=19

Khomeinist Iran always had a great relation with the criminal Nusayri/Alawi rulers of Syria.

#NeverForget Khomeini himself, from the very beginning of the Revolution had excellent ties with the Bathist regime of Hafez Al-Assad. In 1978 when Khomeini was forced to leave Iraq where he had been in exile since 1963, Assad suggested him refuge in Damascus.

[THREAD]

The Rafidi Shia Bid'ah of prostrating on clay tablets (#Turbah) Most laymen Shia (and Sunnis) have never studied this matter in depth, Shia laymen in particular are notorious for copy pasting and parroting what their deceptive clerics and speakers have fed them with. Nothing but distortions as we shall see.

Mass conversions to Sunnism amongst Arab #Ahwazis are a fact that even the hateful Iranian regime doesn't deny. Ayatullats and high ranking officials have many times expressed their concern about the spread of 'Wahhabism' in Khuzestan (Persianised name of #AlAhwaz). The Neo #Safawi regime employs the #Wahhabism card to silence&demonise #Sunnis that are opposed to it, esp. Iranian Sunni dessidents & converts to #Sunnism inside #Iran. It's an old trick that they have learnt from Israel (that demonises its critics with antisemitism allegation).

#AxisOfTheMajoos (Iran, Hezbush-Shaytan&Ansarush-Shaytan (Houthis).

1st the Iranian regime denied their involvement (as it did in Syria), then they got exposed so badly they had to admit it.

Iran exports shirk & terrorism. A cancer ever since the 16th century century

#Safawis

https://twitter.com/YemeniFatima/status/1133827680988741632

Symbolism plays a big role in politics and warfare. These poorly designed logos are made by the same Iranian Khomeinist terrorists, yet they have the audacity to claim that Iran only supports these groups 'morally'.

Taqiyyah runs in their veins.

THREAD:

~~Our master Bilal (ra) struggled with Arabic/Tajwid/Makharij?!

Debunking a folklore based on a fabrication (not reliable hadith!)~~

#Sahaba #Habasha #Habesha #Eritrea #Ethiopia For those who want to watch me explaining it:

Here the two Rafidi clowns, the Park Runner and his brother the Tweezer using the same folklore belief (biLaL strUgGLed wiTh aRaBic/pRonuNciaTioN) and my response: