Research Scientist @Meta. I know humans. Author. Heretic (I left TT job). Tweet β truth. Read "Made to Deliver," my 2021 book on entrepreneurship: https://t.co/RBJG37JQKV
Apr 22, 2022 β’ 7 tweets β’ 2 min read
I turned 40 a few days ago. Here's some stuff I learned so far.
1) The academic world in which your PhD advisors lived is gone: academic jobs are no longer abundant and well payed. Their intuitions about what you should do to be successful are likely unreliable.
Apr 1, 2019 β’ 14 tweets β’ 6 min read
Thread on writing discussion sections for qual research in constructionist/constructivist traditions.
The idea for this comes from the responses to my previous thread (
Mini thread on writing the results section of a qual research paper. I will limit my comments to people writing within constructivist or constructionist paradigms.
1/10
#acwri#phdchat#qualresearch
First, accept that you are analyzing and interpreting the data. You are writing the piece, and therefore you should be in the paper. I prefer the first person (plural or singular, depending on whether you are writing in a team or alone, respectively).