Dr Elise Paradis 🦾πŸ’ͺ🏿πŸ’ͺ🏾πŸ’ͺ🏽πŸ’ͺ🏼πŸ’ͺ🏻πŸ’ͺ Profile picture
Research Scientist @Meta. I know humans. Author. Heretic (I left TT job). Tweet β‰  truth. Read "Made to Deliver," my 2021 book on entrepreneurship: https://t.co/RBJG37JQKV
Apr 22, 2022 β€’ 7 tweets β€’ 2 min read
I turned 40 a few days ago. Here's some stuff I learned so far.

Inspired by / reflecting Paul's thread below.
#actwitter #phdchat @ProfessorIsIn 1) The academic world in which your PhD advisors lived is gone: academic jobs are no longer abundant and well payed. Their intuitions about what you should do to be successful are likely unreliable.
Apr 1, 2019 β€’ 14 tweets β€’ 6 min read
Thread on writing discussion sections for qual research in constructionist/constructivist traditions.

The idea for this comes from the responses to my previous thread () on writing up findings.

#phdchat #acwri #qualresearch #RxWritingChallenge 1/14 .@mededdoc wondered: If findings are interpreted in the eponymous section, what comes in the discussion of a qual constructionist/constructivist paper?

2/14 (hey, #WritingCommunity! this is for you too)
Mar 26, 2019 β€’ 10 tweets β€’ 2 min read
Mini thread on writing the results section of a qual research paper. I will limit my comments to people writing within constructivist or constructionist paradigms.

1/10

#acwri #phdchat #qualresearch First, accept that you are analyzing and interpreting the data. You are writing the piece, and therefore you should be in the paper. I prefer the first person (plural or singular, depending on whether you are writing in a team or alone, respectively).

2/10