Thread by @LHissrich

Any tv writer will tell you, it's the ONLY move. Before we begin, we have to know where we're going to end -- or else we risk the episodes dragging, meandering, fizzing out, or being too crowded as we rush to the finale.

Let's discuss how we craft a season arc on #Witcher.

On the first day, @declandebarra (tall, carries a yard stick) draws eight identical columns on the white boards, labeling them 101 through 108: that's the pilot (101 = Season One, Episode One) through the finale. Remember the picture I posted months ago? See the columns?

101 is the easiest; it's written. 102 is traditionally the hardest, because it's the first time the series has come OUT of my brain, and INTO the brains of six other writers (including @jennydelherpes, who kicked its ass) and we're collectively processing and asking: what's next?

And that's a LOT of pressure, so instead of staring at 102, we turn our attention to 108. What's a satisfying conclusion to the season that not only fulfills Geralt and Co's emotional journeys, but also keeps the audience hanging on for another year, to come back for more? (🙏)

Spoiler: the end we're driving toward makes me weep.

Moving on: with the end firmly in place, we focus on filling in the columns leading up to it, from 102 to 107. And while I can't tell you what @hailzor and @BeauDeMayo wrote on the board (color-coded by character), here are some of the questions we asked as we did it:

Does Geralt (and Co) grow and change throughout the season, in episodic building blocks?
Is that change a right-sized puzzle piece to a more macro show-long development?
Is there enough pulse-pounding action? Is there enough equally-magnetic non-action? (This is SUPER important).

Is there enough emotion? Enough humor? Enough Roach? 🐴
Where do monsters fit in? And romance?
What world-building do we need to set up for future seasons? What courts, hierarchies, politics?
How do we establish that environment without OVER-explaining?

Are we spending enough time with each of our main characters, individually and collectively?
What other characters do we need to meet? What are their backstories?
How do can they be an organic part of this season, while saving the juice of their arc for a future season?

Are we honoring the books?
Are we honoring the world? The existing fans? New fans?
Are we adding the right amount of unexpected twists and turns so that the tv adaptation is as fun and surprising as other adaptations, while still staying true to the work's original intentions?

And a million more, and the answers go on the board, and then we -- including @sne_k and Mike O, who've been with me for years, who I trust implicitly -- kick the metaphorical tires. Because it's not enough that the season makes sense. It must be the BEST way to tell the stories.

So we write and erase and rewrite and re-break again and again, until it works, which is fine because no matter what, we have a PLAN. The reason we're moving so quickly (ten weeks!) is because we know where we're going, and we can't wait to get there.

This lost its retweet context, but @xXbyMarkoXx, this thread is for you, in response to --

"Thinking about the ending when you don't even have episode 5 is dumb, and a wrong move"

I hope you can see that it's actually the right one. The only one.