Profile picture
Maximiliano Isi @maxisi
, 10 tweets, 4 min read Read on Twitter
Besides #GravitationalWaves from pairs of black holes & neutron stars, @LIGO and @ego_virgo could detect the combined rumble of the many sources that are too far away (hence too faint) for us to distinguish individually. We call this a “stochastic background” (1/N)
This stochastic background of gravitational waves is almost like the pitter-patter of rain on a tin roof, or the drumming of popcorn: many individual short sounds adding up to a noisy whole (2/N)
As a more scientific analogy, this is also similar to the cosmic microwave background (CMB): noisy radiation produced in the early universe that reaches from all directions. Except instead of light, the stochastic background we look for is made of gravitational waves! (3/N)
We search for stochastic GWs in LIGO/Virgo data by looking for “coherent” noise across detectors, i.e. a signal that shares many properties with instrumental noise, except it looks exactly the “same” in all detectors (4/N)
Although we have not detected evidence of the stochastic background yet, we can limit its magnitude as a function of frequency, e.g. journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/1…
Detecting a signal like this would be extremely important: it would not only allow us to better understand populations of black holes, but also explore exotic physics like cosmic strings and test Einstein’s theory gravity! link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Ph… (6/N)
BUT you have to be careful! when we search for stochastic signals, we make *many* assumptions about the properties of gravitational waves (and space time in general) that need not be true if Einstein was wrong... this means it’s not that easy to interpret our measurements (7/N)
But fret not! If you’re trying to probe the nature of gravity with stochastic waves, @duetosymmetry and I have you covered: we review assumptions that go into LIGO searches (so you don’t have to!) and show how to correctly derive constraints w examples journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/1…
The bottom line is: tread carefully! Especially if you want to talk about the “energy carried by a gravitational wave, a notion that is v theory dependent (9/N)
End of plug! If you want to learn more about stochastic gravitational waves check out our nontechnical summary ligo.org/science/Public… OR, if so inclined, this technical review link.springer.com/article/10.100… (10/10)
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Maximiliano Isi
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!