,
5 tweets,
3 min read
Read on Twitter
Please remember to vote - it takes 20 seconds
I have never told anyone how to vote, it's your choice. Respectful difference in opinion is always healthy. So it's disappointing @OurDutyOfCare feels it has to resort to attempting to guilt people with inflammatory accusations.
I have never told anyone how to vote, it's your choice. Respectful difference in opinion is always healthy. So it's disappointing @OurDutyOfCare feels it has to resort to attempting to guilt people with inflammatory accusations.
The RCP is polling its members about their views on assisted dying. Instead of recognising this as a sensible approach, @OurDutyOfCare implies the @theRCN doesn't care if people take their lives, because their stance is neutral. 
Every point here is wrong.
I am my brother's legal guardian. He has severe learning disabilities. No matter what happens I would never ever advocate assisted dying for someone like him. AD is and always will be for fully competent adults. This is pure scaremongering.
I am my brother's legal guardian. He has severe learning disabilities. No matter what happens I would never ever advocate assisted dying for someone like him. AD is and always will be for fully competent adults. This is pure scaremongering.
It is not only possible to set limits, it is an imperative. Public opinion is overwhelmingly in favour of assisted dying, which is exactly why medical bodies need to engage in the debate, not make nonsensical claims like it is impossible to set limits.
The legally recognised term used by @RCPLondon is assisted dying. Substituting this for assisted suicide is deliberate on the part of those in opposition.
Once again, please vote how you feel. But research for yourself and don't be swayed by propaganda on either side. Thank you.
Once again, please vote how you feel. But research for yourself and don't be swayed by propaganda on either side. Thank you.
