Julian Jessop FRSA Profile picture
Jun 27, 2019 4 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Beware the latest dire warnings about the impact of #Brexit on the #tech sector. Main fear seems to be the impact on skilled #migration from the EU, but this would be entirely in the UK government’s hands to manage. Tech is also one of the most global of industries... (1/4)
The UK’s advantages as a location for #tech investment are also largely #Brexit-proof or might actually be strengthened by leaving (e.g. chance to escape some of the crazier regulations). Loss of EU official funding is a red herring too, since the UK is a net contributor... (2/4)
There is some evidence that #Brexit uncertainty is holding back private #investment in the #tech sector – as it is in the economy as a whole. But the UK still tops the league tables and any pause is likely to be temporary. See this from KPMG... (3/4)
kpmgenterprise.co.uk/perspectives/v…
#ProjectFear headlines have focused on the decline in the number of venture capital deals done in the UK #tech sector. But this is happening elsewhere in Europe too, as the economy slows and confidence falters, and even in France, which some now see as UK's main rival here. (4/4)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Julian Jessop FRSA

Julian Jessop FRSA Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @julianHjessop

Jul 20
Over the last few days I've read some terrible takes on the 4-5 year jail sentences handed out to five #JustStopOil protestors (aka 'the #WholeTruthFive').

Here's a short 🧵 on why the sentences were justified and where the critics have gone wrong...
First, the facts.

It seems obvious that many of the people questioning the sentences haven't read the judge's explanation 👇

TL;DR the activists were convicted of conspiracy to cause a public nuisance which resulted in major disruption on the M25...

judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl…
The jury that convicted the #WholeTruth5 heard ample evidence of the significant harms done to members of the public (just some examples below), and of course it could have been even worse (indeed, this was the stated aim of the conspirators)...
Image
Image
Read 12 tweets
Jun 23
By popular demand, here’s a quick thread explaining the OBR’s assumption that #Brexit will reduce UK GDP by 4% over the longer term - and why it shouldn’t be treated as gospel.

First, let’s be clear what the figure actually means… 🧵
The OBR has assumed that the additional frictions to UK-EU trade after #Brexit will damage UK #productivity.

As a result, the *level* of GDP (strictly, GDP per head) will be 4% lower than it would otherwise have been in every year over the longer term...
Note...

i) this does not mean that annual *growth* would be 4% lower every year (that should be obvious!)

ii) this is only about trade, not other factors like immigration or domestic regulations

iii) the 4% is a guess at the long-term impact, not what has already happened
Read 14 tweets
Apr 16
I was going to ignore this obviously misleading post, but it is now being widely retweeted by the the usual suspects.

It is also a super example of #FBPE #Brexit 'confirmation bias'... 🙄 🧵 (1/7)

#badbrexittakes #tourism Image
Note first that the '23%' figure is unsourced ⚠️

It might be a misreading of data from the Association of Leading Visitor Attractions (ALVA), which reported that total visitor numbers to their sites were still 23% lower in 2022 than in 2019... (2/7)

bbc.co.uk/news/uk-649760…
But this is, of course, about #Covid, not #Brexit.

The ALVA itself attributed the shortfall "mainly to the absence of international visitors, notably from China and the Far East".



Global air travel and tourism was also still depressed in 2022... (3/7)alva.org.uk/details.cfm?p=…
Read 7 tweets
Nov 26, 2023
Just following up on the #Nissan story, here's what's happened to UK #manufacturing output (in volume terms) since the #Brexit vote 👇

The UK's outperformance can be explained by several factors (some temporary, but some longer lasting)...

(1/4)

source: data.oecd.org/industry/indus…
Image
This is partly about being in the right sectors at the time.

UK #manufacturing has a higher weight on pharma and #food, lower on #autos, capital and luxury goods, so was relatively well-positioned during #Covid, the supply chain and energy crises, and #China's slowdown... (2/4)
#Brexit has had positive impacts here too.

Some may only be temporary: the fall in #sterling improved the competitiveness of UK production, with a further boost from stockpiling ahead of Brexit itself (the UK didn't actually leave the SM and CU until the end of 2020)... (3/4)
Read 4 tweets
Nov 1, 2023
📢 The Treasury/Tories should be making more of this... 👇

The proportion of low-paid employee jobs in the UK (based on hourly pay) fell to 8.9% in 2023 (from 10.7% in 2022), the lowest since this series began in 1997...

(1/5)

source: ons.gov.uk/employmentandl…
Image
The main driver has been the increase in the National Living Wage (#NLW).

In 2020 the Government set a target for the NLW to reach 2/3 of median earnings by 2024.

23-24 year olds were brought onto the full NLW in 2021, and 21-22 year olds will join them next year...

(2/5) Image
The upshot is that the % of 'low-paid' jobs, defined as those on less than 2/3 of median earnings, should fall further in 2024.

It won't ever quite reach zero (not all jobs are covered by the full NMW), but it will get closer.

However, before we get too carried away... (3/5) Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 27, 2023
FYI, Richard Hughes (Chair of the #OBR) did *not* say yesterday that #Brexit has (already) shrunk the UK economy by 4%.

Instead, he repeated the OBR’s estimate that it will reduce long-run productivity by 4%, which is still just an *assumption*.

This needs some explaining… 🧵
The 4% focuses on the negative impact of a fall in trade, assuming both exports and imports are 15% lower in the long run (c.15 years) than if the UK had remained in the EU.

The evidence to date has not been enough to change the OBR’s mind, but it is far too soon to be sure…
Indeed, much of this evidence is hard to square with the assumption of a large and permanent #Brexit hit: goods trade with the EU and the rest of the world have performed similarly, services have held up well, and overall trade intensity now appears to be recovering...
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(