Beware the latest dire warnings about the impact of #Brexit on the #tech sector. Main fear seems to be the impact on skilled #migration from the EU, but this would be entirely in the UK government’s hands to manage. Tech is also one of the most global of industries... (1/4)
The UK’s advantages as a location for #tech investment are also largely #Brexit-proof or might actually be strengthened by leaving (e.g. chance to escape some of the crazier regulations). Loss of EU official funding is a red herring too, since the UK is a net contributor... (2/4)
There is some evidence that #Brexit uncertainty is holding back private #investment in the #tech sector – as it is in the economy as a whole. But the UK still tops the league tables and any pause is likely to be temporary. See this from KPMG... (3/4) kpmgenterprise.co.uk/perspectives/v…
#ProjectFear headlines have focused on the decline in the number of venture capital deals done in the UK #tech sector. But this is happening elsewhere in Europe too, as the economy slows and confidence falters, and even in France, which some now see as UK's main rival here. (4/4)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
IMHO, the UK is in the early stages of the next crisis, but we're not heading to the IMF... 🧵
1⃣ the 1976 bailout was a US$ loan used to pay back other countries who had lent foreign currencies to the UK gov't as it attempted to prop up the pound. That's not the problem now...
2⃣ any IMF bailout would come with such punitive conditions - including big cuts in public spending - that it would be politically unacceptable.
Put another way, if the UK government were willing to take these tough decisions, we wouldn't need the IMF in the first place...
3⃣ the IMF simply doesn't have the resources to bail out an economy as large as the UK.
This is compounded by the fact that many other countries are now in the same boat, including other IMF members who would have to approve the loan.
Five quick points on the adverse market reaction to Rachel Reeves' first #Budget... 🧵
1⃣ it's premature to talk about a 'meltdown', but today's jump in the cost of UK government borrowing is worrying (especially when yields in other advanced economies are flat or down slightly)
2⃣ 2-year yields have risen the most, suggesting that the jump is mainly driven by expectations that the short-term boost to growth and #inflation from the Budget (according to the OBR) will prompt the Bank of England to keep official rates higher for longer...
3⃣ however, worries about the extra bond issuance are clearly a factor too
The fact that #sterling has also fallen confirms that investor confidence is now more fragile, and that markets think higher rates and a cheaper currency will both be needed to attract foreign buyers...
Over the last few days I've read some terrible takes on the 4-5 year jail sentences handed out to five #JustStopOil protestors (aka 'the #WholeTruthFive').
Here's a short 🧵 on why the sentences were justified and where the critics have gone wrong...
First, the facts.
It seems obvious that many of the people questioning the sentences haven't read the judge's explanation 👇
TL;DR the activists were convicted of conspiracy to cause a public nuisance which resulted in major disruption on the M25...
The jury that convicted the #WholeTruth5 heard ample evidence of the significant harms done to members of the public (just some examples below), and of course it could have been even worse (indeed, this was the stated aim of the conspirators)...
By popular demand, here’s a quick thread explaining the OBR’s assumption that #Brexit will reduce UK GDP by 4% over the longer term - and why it shouldn’t be treated as gospel.
First, let’s be clear what the figure actually means… 🧵
The OBR has assumed that the additional frictions to UK-EU trade after #Brexit will damage UK #productivity.
As a result, the *level* of GDP (strictly, GDP per head) will be 4% lower than it would otherwise have been in every year over the longer term...
Note...
i) this does not mean that annual *growth* would be 4% lower every year (that should be obvious!)
ii) this is only about trade, not other factors like immigration or domestic regulations
iii) the 4% is a guess at the long-term impact, not what has already happened